The real top speed champion
The new Shelby cobra if its goes into production is promised to be capable of 265+ mph but on the other hand Veyron is to go 260+ what do you put your money on?
|
BUllshit info. 420kmh needs a good shit load of downforce to be anywere near controllable. Has to be a really wide car. SOmething like the 917.
There is no way that the new cobra is gonna go anywere near that speed. You need shit loads of BHP and a good aero body for some grip......I doubt it will have either. |
where did u get that info about the cobra!?!?
doesn't sound too likely to me.... |
I didn´t know that info, but IMO neither of those cars are going to do more than 260 mph. :|
|
I'm just running off site rumors.
http://www.allfordmustangs.com/artma...icle_327.shtml again here http://www.supercars.net/cars/2004@$Ford@$Shelby%20Cobra%20Conceptx.html and here again http://www.stangnet.com/2005shelbycobraconcept/ Drivetrain Layout Mid-front engine, rear transmission, rear-wheel-drive Transmission Type Ricardo 6-speed transaxle Gear Ratios Theoretical top speed at redline 1st 2.60:1 64 mph 2nd 1.70:1 98 mph 3rd 1.23:1 135 mph 4th 0.95:1 175 mph 5th 0.76:1 219 mph 6th 0.63:1 267 mph Reverse 3.14:1 Final Drive 3.36:1 limited slip |
umm first off the car DOES NOT have a transaxle in it.
And gearing and aerodynamics are two very different things the car may be able to do it if you change the body. And when they were building the car on Rides it appeared to have the tranny on the engine not at the rear. |
Well theoretical top speed based purely on gearing is not that reliable. First of all it is a roadster so cant be that aero efficient. The car is likely to hit an aerodynamic wall well before that... I mena it is not the first car to pack 500+ horsepower is it and how many other 267 mph cars do we know of in that category ?
We'll see when the car finally comes out... |
I really dont think that is possible. ME 4 12 maybe?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Re: The real top speed champion
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
also, if the Ford GT could max out 6th... i believe the ratios are quite similar. and i dont believe this car could go hugely above 200mph if made a production car, based on aero. |
top speed based on gear ratios is pure BS. It doesn't consider the drag coeficient, or anything like that. 6th gear in my vette is so tall that it's should hit well into 200.
also the number on the speedometer doesn't mean shit. the speedo in my vette goes up to 200, and there's no way in hell I'm gonna hit tha speed with the stoc power. |
Quote:
|
sorry didn't mean to start an arguement just wanted to know everyones views.
In my oppinion theirs no way in hell. shit the GT-90 had 1200 hp v-12 and only reached 235 mph. :oops: |
Quote:
|
The Koenigsegg CCR is starting to sell, and IMO it´s the only serious car at this moment capable of going around 250 mph. But of course it has to be proved....
|
Quote:
|
i thought the ccr was at 245? limit or is that the cc?
|
Quote:
|
wow, i wish it was that easy, Companies like Bugatti and Koenigsegg spend a lot of time on aerodynamics and then Ford comes out with a car that is about as aerodynamic as an Audi TT and it goes 260mph, Sarcasm :roll:
|
Just remember it can ahppen though.. :P
In 1988 Callaway went 255 mph in this "overweight plastic leafspring bathtub".. ;) http://www.fast-autos.net/callaway/sh.jpg http://www.fast-autos.net/callaway/sh2.jpg |
Oh yes, the Callaway Sledgehammer isn't it ? A 880 bhp twin-turbo engine and a top speed of 400 km/h +
|
Quote:
|
This topic is more proof of how big of an idiot FordGTGuy really is. :|
|
^^^^^^^
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Veyron's quoted top speed is 252mph, the Ford Shelby cobra concept, with a mere 605bhp is geared to do a theoretical 267mph...HOWEVER, its aerodynamics would NEVER allow it to do such speeds, at least not with anything near the power it has now. |
265+ does'nt sound very likely...... but who knows? :?
|
mabey to put it into easy terms...
the amount of air pushing against the car is 16 times greater then what you would feel traveling at 67mph. |
BS.
|
Quote:
|
no big name manufacturer will build a convertable that goes over 200mph. the general rule of thumb is around 180mph. ford also doesn't have the budget to build a car like this.
|
Quote:
|
Neither the veyron nor the ford will be hitting 260mph, unfortunately. (though i think it would be cool if we had some car that could...). I find the "brutal looking overweight plastic leafspring bathtub" rather intriguing, and it begs the question (pragmatism aside), YTF can't we make cars that can attain those velocities now? If it was doable in 1988...
|
the shelby cobra will go into production, i have confirmation on that. but i doubt it will go 265+ they usually try to keep convertables under 200mph. ford really doesn't have the money to be building this. i have talk to someone in the "know," and the ford GT is enough. apparently they are wanting to do a double punch on GM. but at least i got the documentation of this car being built on the "daisy" platform
|
http://www.kick-asscars.com/pics/201...elby-cobra.jpg
Can anyone tell me how a car with this shape would be able to max out over 265mph?? BS. It hasn't got nearly enough downforce. |
hmmmm what an asshole. I knew it would never go that fast as a convertible. Do you think I'm retarded?. Veyrons is in the same bucket designing for form then fuction so this would never go its promised speed at its corrent design. I was only argueing the gearing stats that were given that the car has the potential to reach 267+ in its gearing stats maxed out in last gear. But the same goes with the veyron do you have any living proof that this car goes this fast?
|
Quote:
|
No, it doesn't look like he has. :wink:
|
So - in the end we seem to have a winner.... at 255.1mph the Sledgehammer is the undisputed heavyweight champ of the world... :twisted:
0X :fist: 0X :fist: Everyone else is either measurably slower or just "theoretically faster".. :) Gotta love them old technology cars... heheheh :lol: hehehee |
Yes, incredible,
Some statistics 656.2 kw / 880.0 hp 1589 kg Top Speed 409.9 kph / 254.7 mph 0 - 60 mph 3.9 seconds great, so old car, and that speed, but what about Big Boy Veyron |
arent we talking bout the fastest priduction car ??? not tuned or anything similar to that ???
i guess the sledgehammer proves that even if u have a car thats not designed for high speeds u can make even a corvette faster than a mclaren, so take that mclaren fans ! hahaha |
lol that makes RC45 so warm inside
|
Interesting where this thread has gone....
Well, in the interest of continuing to bash newer, more modern cars and flaunt the old rusted buckets of mechanical engineering how about the 1938 Mercedes-Benz W125 ? Supercars.net has a section for the road legal cars with the highest top speed. The Sledgehammer is on there.... but it's #2, behind this 1930's Mercedes. 1. 433 kph / 269.1 mph 1938 Mercedes-Benz W125 Record 2. 409.9 kph / 254.7 mph 1988 Chevrolet Callaway Sledgehammer Corvette 1938?????!!!! 269.1mph?????!!! |
Quote:
Lets talk about production cars. Fastest straight out of the factory. And not some one off or 5 car production run. |
67 is a lot closer to 5 then 5,000... let alone 399 ;)
sooooo... since 5,000 is way much less close to 5 then 399 is... then the Ford GT eclipses anything as the Worlds Fastest Production Car! ;) |
What is the top speed of the Ford GT? A Murcielago will hand it its ass in a race.
As for tuned cars and their top speed, the Gemballa tuned Diablo VT Roadster hit a confirmed 410km/h or 255mp/h and it would rip the Callaway in half when it comes to straight line acceleration or going around a bend. |
Teflon I don't think so the Ford GT goes .2 secs slower than an Enzo in a 1/4 mile and the Top speed is electronically set at 205 mph but 216 mph has been reached at Nardo.
|
212mph @ nardo with the silver/black stripes GT, the yellow/black stripes hit 209 mph when it had about 7,000 miles on it, the silver/black one was fairly well 'worn' in as well.
it is concievable that the GT would hit 216 if there was no banking, but it 'only' was 212mph at its top end. dont forget, the gt. vs murcialago comparison, i think is fairly good... the two cars have similar weights, and simlar power ratings... so a comparison is inevitable. one is ferocious, and the other is easy to drive ;) |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.