...402km/h in the Veyron - AMS test
http://img358.imageshack.us/img358/9...09400wu.th.jpghttp://img358.imageshack.us/img358/3...09418ze.th.jpghttp://img358.imageshack.us/img358/8...09420dc.th.jpghttp://img358.imageshack.us/img358/9...09439es.th.jpg
http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/1...09445hg.th.jpg AMS chief editor Bernd Ostmann has been the first mag tester that had the pleasure to ride 400+ in the EB 16.4 Bugatti Veyron at VW test course Ehra-Lessien... some impressions what he said about that day... the track has been kinda damp in the morning, kinda scary at 400km/h, so 111m/sec without crash barries like in Nardo, well not really, rear wing setup to 2° so 40 to 50kg downforce at rear axle engineers promise that thisīll be enough for a smooth ride even on wet pavement... through the first corner with 220 easily - absolute brutal accelerating up to 300 within seconds a light left hand bend with 380 - looking into the rear mirror - just an enormous spray but just like they told the EB16.4 is a very smooth car to ride even at that speeds... the sepcial Michelin tires are working just perfect, they were tested up to 500km/h and before a high speed run they require 3bar pressure - this is one of the points the driver has to go through with a check list and a second car key to unlock the high speed mode - here the two front diffusor flaps are closed, the rear wing selects 2° and the body is lowered to 6.5cm front and 7cm rear a sepecial system is monitoring everything and when only one parameter is not ok the car automatically switches to handling-mode... the first run ended with "only" 380km/h - the car switched to handling because the exhaust temperatures reached critical 970°C - cooling down the car at 220 or 5000rpm in 4th gear... the weather gets better, itīs much warmer now and engineers force the AMS team to "act" - next run 398km/h - this time itīs the driverīs fault as he has enabled the A/C on the previous cooling lap costing some km/h on that fast run - so again a cooling lap and then full concentration on the last run with nearly 400 the rpm showed 5800 in 7th gear, now it shows 6200rpm at a speed of 402km/h ... braking is again a new experience 31.4m (!!!) from 100 to 0 with a 1950kg car... on the other hand acceleration is also outstanding - measured 25m long black rubber from all four wheels after the standard sprint with launch-control - result: 2.5sec to 100 and 7.3 to 200 :shock: on a side note - at 400 km/h the EB16.4 needs ONE liter fuel for ONE kilometer so they calculated every 12min a gas station on autobahn when driving 400 :wink: havenīt seen anything yet but i think thereīll be a special on AMS-TV in one of the following shows, be sure itīll be posted here asap... :) |
Thanks St-Anger!! Great article.
|
WOW 2.5 sec to 100? I didnt even think that was possible................damn it out accelerates a bike
|
:shock: OMG is this real?
|
Oh - 0-100kmh... 2.5 is still a full second slower than bikes :P ;)
Was that 1l/km? :lol: They get tops speed, top accelartion, top stoping and top fuel consumption.. Not bad ;) Now - can it turn...??? :?: :?: |
jesus christ! that is some crazy figures...
thanks st anger! |
Quote:
Which leads to me original thought - let's see it turn a corner.. :) |
So bascially the time it take me to say "What the fuck?" in a normal rate, the car already accelerate to 100km/h..... :shock: :shock:
1L/km @ 0.111km/s translate to 9L/s ......... I would like to see the fuel injectors @ work lol |
Quote:
|
The Veyron figures are incredible ! :shock:
Thanks Herr St-Anger for this AMS scan. :D |
Holy Shit!!!
Thx a bunch for these scans St-Anger !!! I was about to go to bed, but now I'll read it at once! I can't wait to see the vid :twisted: |
Thanks St-Anger! those are some insane acceleration and braking figures :shock: seriously, for a car that weighs that must those brakes must be of other-worldly materials to stop it that fast!
also, does anyone know what Michelin used to test the tires to 500km/hr? |
Quote:
1L/KM.... 9L/s... and say a 100L tank.. that means you are out of gas in 12s? Where have we gone wrong with our math? ;) |
Quote:
|
It can't be 9L/s cos the fuel rings in F1 do 12.1L/s. :shock:
In fact it is 0.111L/s 0.111/s x 60s = 6.66L/m 6.66L/m x 12m = 79.92L I think this is the correct figure 0.111/sec :D Still that should be a problem for the people in UAE. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.