![]() |
Automotorsport: M5 Touring vs E63 AMG T
http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/6...e631kh5.th.jpghttp://img181.imageshack.us/img181/3...6320gx7.th.jpg
http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/7...e633wr4.th.jpg http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/284...e634tx1.th.jpghttp://img89.imageshack.us/img89/492/m5vse635je4.th.jpg The E 63 T wins this test. Best combination, an estate car with the perfomance of an high performance car and the comfort of a Mercedes. M5 Touring: Also as Touring this car is an absolutely sports car. But the comfort isn't that good and the boot is conspicuously smaller... AMS think the seats in the M5 is more comfortable than E63, suspension stiffer though on the M5 but that is expected. Also M5 Touring handle better than E63 according to AMS. M5 /E63 0-100 4.7 s/ 4.6 s 0-160 10.1 s/ 9.9 s 0-180 12.2 s/ 12.4 s 0-200 14.8 s/ 15.3 s Fuel Consumption L/100KM: 16.8 / 16.6 //Thanks to Ree on GCZ for the scans. |
Nice article thanks.
I would still choose this and then have little help from Hennessey.. http://carfreaks.net/content/?p=99 To blow the doors away.. |
a nice read, looks like the mercedes only won by a couple of points
|
I'd be superhappy with either one. Just amazing cars.
|
^^ LOL, true I guess..
Anyway nice article the M5 station really is the perfect family car! :D |
Yuck, don't like breaks at all :?
|
Nice article about two awesome cars. Thanks :wink:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yet another "budget" hotrod that has stepped inot the "euro" arena and turned out to be very wicked :twisted: |
Quote:
|
You would be surprised... and the normal Cayenne Turbo buyer would be more angered and embaressed by being beaten by a "cheap" Jeep SRT/8 than you care to admit - after all, the ego that goes with a big wallet sometimes is al that you see ;)
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.