Originally Posted by nthfinity
SAAC broke the license agreement. I don't know about you, breaking a signed accord in a profitable business isn't such a keen thing to do after many years of mutually beneficial....
|
I could go search and post the SAAC counter, but the bottomline is that he would have nothing to retake if it were not for the likes of SAAC et al.
It is a rather transparent run to grab what little bit of the legacy is left - and some legacy there - aren't Shelby shares trading at abtou .36c?
If the contention is that SAAC is for "profit" - lets see ho wmuch cool cash they made over the years keeping the torch going while Shelby all but ignored anyone who enjoyed his cars and creations of the past?
And what happens when he kicks the bucket? Another slew of legal battles as the heirs battle it out over whats left?
Quite frankly, once he "sold the cars" any all data records and information poertaining to the cars, the owners and collectibles is no longer his to lay claim to - even if it has his name all over it.
The only ones who will out of this will be the lawyers.
Sad way to close an era if you ask me.
Even though the three of them have slandered me by making public statements that I am 'evil,' I'm still entitled to get my personal belongings back. Who can disagree with that?
|
Isn't this the same defense OJ Simpson is using in Vegas ?
I can see it now "If the badge aint legit - you must aquit"...
One final thing..
The bottom line is my legacy should be left in the hands of my family and real enthusiasts. I want to extend an offer to the local clubs to contact my office and arrange for a license to use the Shelby and Cobra name at the same base cost that we offered SAAC of $1. This will allow them to continue their great work.
|
This is a slight change of attitude that wasnt displayed initially... and was part of the original concern that hi s lawsuite actually extends to include the regional and local chapters... maybe the old coot i shaving a change of heart after all