View Single Post
Old 04-07-2008, 09:21 AM   #23
Mattk
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
Default

Yeah, I reckon the old system of 10, 6, 4, 3, 2, 1 was much better at rewarding top placings. Not only were there fewer points in total on offer, there was a bigger bonus for winning.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
Mattk is offline   Reply With Quote