View Single Post
Old 03-13-2007, 04:14 PM   #41
harryo2b
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 476
Default

Originally Posted by nthfinity
Originally Posted by pagani
Originally Posted by nthfinity
so it looks like I was right as well?
I think not
The mclaren f1 still faster than the ferrari enzo round a track even if it's weaker chassis and weaker brakes than a modern supercar.
90's technologic and still beats all current supercars round a track.
So it's still the king.
what track, what form of F1 (how many F1's do we have to have to get a fast one around a track?) Is the suspension as the factory set it Originally

Any trackday king with a F1 can have the geomoetires re-set... but... lets look at the video originally posted, and tell me that is somehow faster around a track then an Enzo. It just isn't.

It doesn't beat the new supercars, and it didn't beat the old supercars either.

Jag XJ220 = superior cornering, steering feel
Vector W8 = superior cornering, power, tire tech, safety, steering feel
EB110 = superior in almost every way as well, particularly if you opt for one of the 9 real EB110 SS models with over 700 hp.
F40 = superior handling, steering feel

The F1 is a loose can of tuna with an a mazing engine.

And, pagani, I guess you didn't read my previous post when I was responding to Sameer regarding the F1 LM Long short tail GTR's engine prowes (only 600 hp... but I suggested it must be way up in torque over 'factory' 480 ft. lbs... which it is)
Got facts to back up your info?

Your "superior" this and that is subjective.
Who the heck talks about the Vector?!

What's the Power to Weight Ratio of both the Enzo and the F1?

Pagani, He did mention the EB 110 SS "SUPER SPORT"
__________________

2006 Porsche Boxster S/Atlas Grey Metallic/Black/Black/6 spd
Canon 30D/17-85 IS/70-200 4L IS/580EXII/430EX/B+W Filters
harryo2b is offline   Reply With Quote