View Single Post
Old 04-07-2004, 01:02 AM   #48
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by TT
LOL 1600 is still enough of course I have stored lot of 3000 pixels ones too, but the problem is that basically the net is not really for such big pics.. they are meant for printing, so usually if you publish them, better to reduce to make things faster and easy to look at
The prospect of maybe printing some of my images is why I always keep the highest res versions. DVD's are cheap.

Of course you reduce the res for web use - but why should I miss out on high quality prints because of "other" web viewers.

A decade ago I was into SLR photography, and always lost "that perfect" pic, because I didn't take 2 or 3 when I had the chance - now that we have digital home production ability I figured screw that.. LOL never again will I miss the "shot"
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote