Originally Posted by Mattk
Perhaps, but that was a different assault. There was no nexus between the bonnet incident and the fight incident.
Different incident yet again. There were three incidents here. Firstly, the rear window incident, secondly, the bonnet incident, and thirdly, the fight incident. None of those three can be conflated.
|
The back window and bonnet were attacks on the occupant of the car, the ensuing pursuit was simply self defense.
In post analysis you can sit and disect the open mob attack into your simplistic "3 incidents" - but by any reasonable standards the attacks were all one and the same at the time they took place, and the victim was reasonable and correct in there pursuit of their attacker.
This is why guns are good.