American Cars Area dedicated to American Cars from Classic, Muscle, to Modern! |
05-17-2004, 05:08 PM
|
#1
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Suffern NY
Posts: 105
|
STS-V caught at N-ring
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 05:09 PM
|
#2
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
|
Thanx, and may I say those stupid tapes on the car are drawing more attention than none
__________________
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 05:14 PM
|
#3
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
well, being that i know auto designers (loosely) the reasons for dark black, and goofy looking camo is to hide the 'suprise' of the new contours of the body, and shape of the plastic head/tail lamps... also, usually used to make it look somewhat like the older model.
ill take the lighterweight CTS-V plus
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 05:21 PM
|
#4
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
I can see their next product... The super-Escalade-V series...
They are about to take a good thing and give it the GM-let's-fuck-it-over-to-sell-more-units-while-the-quality-and-original-intent-goes-down-the-crapper-but-who-cars-our-stock-price-went-up treatment...
---oh, and it will get some gold-trim and stickers - and an extra markup.... ...and 22"-blade-spinners for the rappers....
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 07:35 PM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 438
|
i don't know. maybe GM is going to be the real deal with this from now on. I mean the CTS-V is the real deal. Put a slightly detuned new Z06 engine in this thing and let it go after the new M5. also, what about an XLR-V? put 500 horses in that and you have one HELL of a convertible.
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 08:23 PM
|
#6
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 3,627
|
XLR-V would be stupid they can leave the XLR as is or offer another engine but they aren't going to go overboard I'm sure. The Cadillac manager at one of the local stores (I know his daughter) said the only two they are talking about for anytime in the future are the CTS and STS series cars. BTW they ghetto Escalades for owners if they want it from the Dealer also H2s and he hates both trucks.
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 08:40 PM
|
#7
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
Originally Posted by T-Bird
XLR-V would be stupid they can leave the XLR as is or offer another engine but they aren't going to go overboard I'm sure. The Cadillac manager at one of the local stores (I know his daughter) said the only two they are talking about for anytime in the future are the CTS and STS series cars. BTW they ghetto Escalades for owners if they want it from the Dealer also H2s and he hates both trucks.
|
Yep - you can order a CTS-V "appearance" package for your V6 CTS - complete with thin yellow-stripe tyres and gold badge trim option.... right from the dealer.
As I say - every now and then GM gets a flash of brilliance - then proceed to fuck it up
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 08:45 PM
|
#8
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 3,627
|
I know what your saying they have fucked "some" :roll: things up in the past, but they seem to be playing right with this line of cars. hell the STS-V isn't even slated for a couple years down the road.
EDIT: the appearance package would be a huge ego boost to some young dad driving his stock V6 accord outrunning a supposedly CTS-V
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 09:52 PM
|
#9
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Suffern NY
Posts: 105
|
Originally Posted by T-Bird
I know what your saying they have fucked "some" :roll: things up in the past, but they seem to be playing right with this line of cars. hell the STS-V isn't even slated for a couple years down the road.
EDIT: the appearance package would be a huge ego boost to some young dad driving his stock V6 accord outrunning a supposedly CTS-V
|
i'd love to see an accord outrunning the 255HP RWD CTS-V look alike.
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 09:59 PM
|
#10
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,351
|
i'd love to see an accord outrunning the 255HP RWD CTS-V look alike.
|
And you will. "Patience is a virtue. "
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 10:17 PM
|
#11
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 240
|
Is it me or do the wheels on the spy car look small, for one compared to the size of the car and 2nd to the German counterparts offered up by BMW and Benz? Looks like extensive work went into designing this thing, a Bigger CTS :roll:.
|
|
|
05-18-2004, 12:24 AM
|
#12
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
|
Originally Posted by RC45
I can see their next product... The super-Escalade-V series...
They are about to take a good thing and give it the GM-let's-fuck-it-over-to-sell-more-units-while-the-quality-and-original-intent-goes-down-the-crapper-but-who-cars-our-stock-price-went-up treatment...
---oh, and it will get some gold-trim and stickers - and an extra markup.... ...and 22"-blade-spinners for the rappers....
|
WE RIDE SPINNAS!
__________________
|
|
|
05-18-2004, 12:26 AM
|
#13
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 2,455
|
i'd love to see an accord outrunning the 255HP RWD CTS-V look alike.
|
If you talk about the CTS-V this is the car of 400BHP. Thus, this is only in your dreams that you can think about a JDM outrunning a CTS-V.
|
|
|
05-18-2004, 12:28 AM
|
#14
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
|
No hes talking about the V6 Caddy with the CTS Uniform, but not the CTS-V muscles. But the Accord V6 in Sedan form is faster than a CTS in V6 form.
__________________
|
|
|
05-18-2004, 12:38 AM
|
#15
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
XLR v would not even make sence, GM stated that the reason the 5.7 liter isnt able to fit.... yes, the XLR was the test bed of some of the C6 technologies, but they ended up going for a well powered V8, in a severely over-priced Mercedes poser...
at least it looks good...contrasting to me saying no more 'v' series besides the CTS... cadilac definately needs a 2 door turbocharged 6 to play in the performance numbers of the RS4, and M3 range i think (remember that buick concept with the twin turbo V6 shown this eyar?) hmm... good reason to develop such an engine i think..
to sum up
CTS-V good
STS-V bad
ETS-V (or some 2 door cad -v) good
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|