| The Cool Wall Our version of the cool wall.. you decide what's cool and what's not - view the results HERE |
|
View Poll Results: Dodge Charger SRT8
|
|
subzero
|
  
|
7 |
9.59% |
|
cool
|
  
|
27 |
36.99% |
|
uncool
|
  
|
23 |
31.51% |
|
seriously uncool
|
  
|
16 |
21.92% |
08-16-2006, 09:13 PM
|
#1
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 314
|
Dodge Charger SRT8
|
|
|
08-16-2006, 10:32 PM
|
#2
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rocky Mountains, Colorado
Posts: 995
|
This was a tough one for me.
ON one hand I like the huge engine and power. But the car was built on a budget and the interrior is quite lacking 9on quality and refinement. From what I've read, this isn't the best car to have on a twisty road either. Especially at 4000 pounds.
I think what we have here is a case the car looking great on paper, but it just doen't cut it in the real world. Straigtht line speed alone isn't going to cut it anymore.
It might be cool to look at, but I wouldn't want to be seen in one.
Uncool.
|
|
|
08-16-2006, 11:58 PM
|
#3
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 732
|
Uncool.
I'd rather been seen in a 300C than that!
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 12:17 AM
|
#4
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 30° 4' N 85° 35' W
Posts: 1,783
|
I say uncool. The car would have been way better 2 doors as Dani said. Anyways the only time I drooled over this car was when I say it black on black on black ( Thats Black interior, exterior and rims.) It was an undercover cop car with the lightes above the dashboard and it looked lowered....or it might have just been the weight of the equipement? But anyways that looked so damn nice I couldnt believe my eyes! :shock:
Best part is I see it every now and then. 8)
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 04:43 AM
|
#5
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 159
|
|
Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
Uncool for me - a failed attempt to look like an oldie, like a muscle car... 
|
Dani said it best, nothing to add, uncool.
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 06:37 AM
|
#6
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,566
|
It's not as bad as many other american cars, but they just ruined the Charger name with this 4 door..
__________________
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 11:19 AM
|
#7
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
|
Look, the styling isn't perfect, but I would still consider it a cool car.
BTW, they have a game somewhere on the internet, which is pretty much an advertisement for the Dodge Charger.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 12:15 PM
|
#8
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 486
|
F*** the styling, I drove it and I dont like it. Maybe if it had a proper manual insted of the damn Merc auto trany in it and it weighed less I would like it.
But it doesnt so bleh...... plus the 425hp engine doesnt feel like 425 hp. I had more fun in a 6.0 L GTO than that thang.
__________________
Each car is special in its own way, Unless its a Hyundai  Haha, Im just trippin
|
|
|
04-22-2008, 01:19 PM
|
#9
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
|
Originally Posted by coloradosilver
Especially at 4000 pounds.
I think what we have here is a case the car looking great on paper, but it just doen't cut it in the real world. Straigtht line speed alone isn't going to cut it anymore.
It might be cool to look at, but I wouldn't want to be seen in one.
Uncool.
|
Agreed. But I'm pretty sure it's more than 4000 lbs. The door tag on the one I drove had it at over 5100!
Originally Posted by rave426
Maybe if it had a proper manual ... and it weighed less I would like it. But it doesnt so bleh...... plus the 425hp engine doesnt feel like 425 hp. I had more fun in a 6.0 L GTO than that thang.
|
425 hp isn't going to feel fast with over 2.5 tons on top of it.
GTO was more fun.
|
|
|
04-22-2008, 01:55 PM
|
#10
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,570
|
Originally Posted by 6speedmike
Agreed. But I'm pretty sure it's more than 4000 lbs. The door tag on the one I drove had it at over 5100!
425 hp isn't going to feel fast with over 2.5 tons on top of it.
GTO was more fun.
|
Are you serious? What you saw was likely the gross vehicle weight. The 5100 pounds is how much the car would weigh with its maximum specified payload of oh lets say 4 200 pound people and their luggage.
The car's curb (unladen, but full of fluids etc) weight is 4100 pounds.
Modern crossovers don't even weigh as much as you thought the Charger did.
Last edited by 79TA; 04-22-2008 at 02:10 PM.
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 09:57 PM
|
#11
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
|
|
I had more fun in a 6.0 L GTO than that thang.
|
Of course, it's an Australian design.
The Charger doesn't drive very well in the game either.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
|
|
|
08-21-2006, 12:31 AM
|
#12
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 113
|
-----
Last edited by webby; 09-09-2010 at 03:53 PM.
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 04:41 PM
|
#13
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3
|
|
Originally Posted by webby
ok come on, it's a beast. The front especially looks great and it sounds amazing too. I wonder if people realize that this poll is about the SRT/8 version not the standard or R/T version? The SRT/8 definitely belongs under cool
|
I agree, the SRT/8 is a different animal. There is one at work that's black, black with dark tints. Really special.
|
|
|
09-27-2006, 07:56 AM
|
#14
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 32
|
a discrace for the old charger. thisone doesn't remotely look like it or feel like it.
i've no idea why they even called it a charger.
|
|
|
11-28-2006, 09:21 AM
|
#15
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 948
|
If it had 2 doors it would be cool but it is uncool for me.
__________________
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|