04-17-2004, 01:54 AM
|
#1
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 2,455
|
Ferrari's lovers can you explain this ?
Ferrari's lovers can you explain this ? Because I have no idea how he jumps there.  I'd like to know what really happened.
The pictures are from another forums without explanations, only speculations.
|
|
|
|
04-17-2004, 02:12 AM
|
#2
|
|
Guest
|
it probably went down the hill at a very fast speed and then up the concrete stones explaining the scratches on the front it could have gone fast enough to have part of the car dangling in the air and still have momentum to push the car forward onto the roof and who ever did this is an idiot and also :fist: you whoever is responsible
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2004, 02:14 AM
|
#3
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 980
|
i think that guy is very lucky, coz' it looks like only the front bumper is damaged, lol
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2004, 02:27 AM
|
#4
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Kuching, Malaysia.
Posts: 345
|
Prancing Horse just became Timid Roof-Dwelling Bird. Hmmm.
__________________
^Home.
///M
God's gift to the driver.
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2004, 04:23 AM
|
#5
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
|
from the direction of the car, I don't think it's possible for the Ferrari to land at that spot....
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2004, 05:17 AM
|
#6
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK, Slovenia, Poland
Posts: 1,124
|
wow... flying onto the top of a roof and minimal damage. That is one lucky owner!
__________________
Perfection comes in the form of any Ferrari
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2004, 05:39 AM
|
#7
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 40
|
Now thats an expensive practical joke!!!!! Bloody drink drivers!!!!!!
__________________
Look but don't touch. Touch but don't taste. Taste but don't swallow!!
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2004, 06:22 AM
|
#8
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,381
|
|
Originally Posted by nejcdolinsek
wow... flying onto the top of a roof and minimal damage. That is one lucky owner!
|
That is what I though!
Althoug, there may be damage under the car
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2004, 06:28 AM
|
#9
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Frankfurt am Main
Posts: 190
|
I think the question should be:
How can that shack still be standing?... ´Damn, that is one lucky owner...Probably had to get a crane to get the car off...
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2004, 06:45 AM
|
#10
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,562
|
isnt is obvious. God himself couldn't handle such a beast! lol. all jokes aside what happened?
__________________
Australia. JW Link to Down Under
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2004, 06:46 AM
|
#11
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: België
Posts: 3,213
|
Nooooooooooooo, poor little baby, omg, Ferrari should confiscate that Maranello and never sell a car to this idiot. :x :x :x :x :x
__________________
Bob Woodward - State of denial
Tariq Ali - Clash of Fundamentalisms
Blaire is a figleaf
Cars are my hobby, driving them is my passion.
|
Originally Posted by Dan\/6
damn speedkillar, if you didnt have a title already it would now say 'robofucker' or similar  |
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2004, 10:55 AM
|
#12
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,337
|
How did he get there? Ferrari's have wings didnt you know?
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2004, 11:12 AM
|
#13
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Marlboro, NJ
Posts: 50
|
ouch look at that front bumper, thats like 20,000 for that scratch lol
__________________
Infiniti M45
0-60 5.4s
.89g
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2004, 11:21 AM
|
#14
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,381
|
Are we sure this was not a stunt for a film with a jump just before the roof?? lol
If you look at the kerb, there is very little damage, something must have connected to push the car in the air. It looks like the front skimmed the roof, as the first section looks like it has been rolled back a bit. But if you look at the roof as a whole, the car looks to have just landed there. There are no marks where the car has been, nothing. Surely there would have been some tyre marks somewhere.
It would be interesting to see a shot from further away
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2004, 12:36 PM
|
#15
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 2,455
|
I think the question should be:
How can that shack still be standing?...
|
LOL Thats the real question Sm@ck !
|
If you look at the kerb, there is very little damage, something must have connected to push the car in the air. It looks like the front skimmed the roof, as the first section looks like it has been rolled back a bit. But if you look at the roof as a whole, the car looks to have just landed there. There are no marks where the car has been, nothing. Surely there would have been some tyre marks somewhere.
|
Good interpretation jon_s!  I understand equally your astonishment, because how a car that has enough speed for landing on this roof, have been able to brake for only to remain there ? Like you said Jon_s there are no tyre marks on the street and the roof. That's strange.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
