08-26-2007, 12:41 AM
|
#16
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
What a fucking ugly un-Jaguar looking Jaguar.
All Jag had to fall back on is their "past looks" - the company has nothing without it - in fact without its past heritage Jaguar is nothing.
One can only hope sales will fail and Jaguar will just close up shop for good - seriously, if this is the best they can come up with, why bother?
|
|
|
|
08-26-2007, 01:01 AM
|
#17
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
|
^ Agreed. . . best thing it got going for it the electronic gear shifter.
|
|
|
|
|
08-26-2007, 04:43 AM
|
#18
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rotterdam, Holland, EU
Posts: 3,767
|
|
Originally Posted by regele
the concept looked way better, had the feline look to it and the whole package,
|
exactly!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
08-27-2007, 01:44 AM
|
#19
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
|
It looks like Volvo S80, Mazda 6, Mondeo, Lexus all mixed into one. Not good.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
|
|
|
|
|
08-27-2007, 06:00 PM
|
#20
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
|
Obviously been filtered down by a committee.
I feel Ian Callum's pain. He probably hoped that they wouldn't touch his concept. But Ford, being Ford, just had to compromise it.
|
|
|
|
|
08-28-2007, 12:10 AM
|
#21
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,420
|
I really like it! Far nicer looking inside and out than any of the cars out nowadays, anyways. I am a bit disappointed they didn't go more with the original design, especially the headlights, but hey, you can't have it all. This is a HUGE leap for jag, and I think it will sell great.
Oh, and the next XJ is supposed to be far more daring than this.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
09-01-2007, 11:02 PM
|
#22
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 953
|
Damn that's a fast looking Buick
...I mean Taurus.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
09-06-2007, 09:16 AM
|
#23
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
|
^Yeah, it does have the lines of some of the Buick cars. Maybe not the Taurus...
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
