06-01-2005, 08:25 PM
|
#31
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sumner, Washington
Posts: 181
|
Originally Posted by bmagni
Originally Posted by Aleighy
Originally Posted by bmagni
Thats me, i just dont listen to the beatles that much, IMO thats more pop than rock.
|
Paul McCartney might beg to differ  i dont actually think the term pop regarding a musical genera was around back then, so i think in their day they were considered rock. even now i wouldnt call them pop, i dont think, unless it was paired with the word oldies. when i think pop, i think Britney Spears (yuk). just my opinion tho 
|
what i mean is that the lyrics, the beat, its just not rock and roll, what if the beatles were a new band, that they never existed until these days, they would be sort of pop for sure.
they have some rock songs, i dont deny it, but their basic sound is not rock, compare them to the rolling stones, the doors, led zepellin, they have nothing ot do one with the other.
surely they dont sound like britney, but its like considering maroon 5 a rock group
|
yeah i gotcha, i think we're thinking along the same line...just expressing it differently.
__________________
Hi! I am a forum signature virus. Please copy/paste me to your signature to help me spread!
>BONK<
|
|
|