Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-02-2005, 01:18 PM   #16
Shinigami
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland
Posts: 955
Default

Maybe I haven't driven this one, and I haven't driven the CSL. But according to stats (which may lie, as we all know ) the following would happen:

The CSL does 0-60 in 4.8 seconds. The SLK (standard 55) has been recorded at 4.2. Rumors say 3.9 for the 400hp version.

Top speed of the CSL is 250kph (limited), the same for the SLK. However, you can get the 030 performance package which removes the limiter on the SLK (top speed according to my dealer is 300kph as shown in their DB).

The CSL weight is just short of 1.4 tons. The currentl 55 weighs just over 1.5 tons. With the special version of the SLK, the weight should drop within reach of the CSL.

and finally...

The price of the CSL in Swiss francs, is just over 120k. The price of the SLK is 102k. Add the performance package and you get the same price.

----------

Anyway, numbers are just numbers. I believe in driving a car to find out for yourself if it's the right thing for you Some people want power, others comfort, and so on... The SLK does it for me (for the moment). I'm still young and I want to believe that my future still holds automotive surprised (hopefully pleasant ones) in store
__________________
My new car: MB SLK55 AMG (36months, 40,000miles and still flawless)
My old car: MB SLK230K Brabus - sold
Shinigami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2005, 02:02 PM   #17
Pehtren
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: slovenia, in my BMW
Posts: 1,465
Default

Originally Posted by Shinri_Shiogami
. I'm still young and I want to believe that my future still holds automotive surprised (hopefully pleasant ones) in store
me too

yes i think i understand you, this car will be just for track use, like csl or cs
... but i really could not imagine a mercedes without gadgets you must understand me i just dont
and i think erez thought the same 8)

and i think the standard slk 55 amg has 0-60 time of 4.9 seconds
:roll:
long time ago i stopped beliving this numbers

nice chat 8)
Pehtren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2005, 03:14 PM   #18
martin100
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,545
Default

The original SLK55 is already insane but this is truly mad :shock: Mercedes goes even more crazy then before. I love it.
martin100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2005, 03:39 PM   #19
Erez
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: not where i want to be.. but life's a bitch i guess..
Posts: 3,262
Default

Originally Posted by Shinri_Shiogami
...But few cars exist that have a little bit of everything 'I' want
i agree 110% and i know what you mean.. and its a great car in that aspect!

Originally Posted by Shinri_Shiogami
It's all just relative, I think people should buy cars that make them happy Not cars which make it possible for them to 'prove' something to someone else. If you do that, you're becoming a slave to the machine.
well i can live with that j\k again i agree.. you should and i'm with you i haven't said once other wise.. and i'm sure the SLK would make A LOT of people happy and I couldn't live with an "F40" like car daily.. (well the first few weeks would be great.. but after that it will make me go insane..)

Originally Posted by Shinri_Shiogami
btw: I didn't quite understand what you meeans by "how many of those have you seen around" ? I believe you were talking about the CLK? Seeing as the production is severely limited, it's not easy to see this car on the road. But demand for the car exists, so yes, there are some people who want an MB that is not all about comfort (although I would rather buy something else for that feeling of raw power).
yeah i was talking about the CLK.. and yeah that was my point merc buyers want the merc for it "mercins" if you know what i mean.. for a hardcore car i have ferrari poesche BMW and many many other cars before the mercs..

overall i agree with you 100% man.. other then saying its an answer to the CSL\CS..

(BTW- i like my mercs Brabused 8) )
__________________

Things worth having don't come easy..
Erez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2005, 05:30 PM   #20
ferrari550
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: nfld, Canada
Posts: 915
Default

I like the slk55 amg a lot and this one even more. But i would still take a M3 CSL or a 430cs in a heartbeat.

thanks for the link
__________________
"If you even look at that engine, it'll kill you" - JC
ferrari550 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2005, 10:57 PM   #21
Sir_GT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
Default

Shinri: The SLK55 on it's own is an excellent car. Good car, right price. This however, is merely an upgrade package, and nothing more. They still did not replace the heaviest parts of the car with CF bits (roof, bonnet, and doors) which ultimately discredits this car as being in the same vein as the M3 CSL or the CS cars from Ferrari.

The CF bits and the minimalised doors on this SLK are merely ambience-enhancing cosmetic changes meant to make the owner feel "shportier".

As long as any car retains a heavy-as-a-tree torque-converter automatic, air-con, a radio, sat nav, electric windows, and other luxury bits, it's not a lightweight sports car. The roof especially, should be lightened, because it helps lower the car's centre of gravity. Hence the CF roof in the M3 CSL.
__________________
Studio Gecko
Sir_GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2005, 05:09 AM   #22
Shinigami
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland
Posts: 955
Default

Originally Posted by pehtren
and i think the standard slk 55 amg has 0-60 time of 4.9 seconds
This is the time quoted by MB. MB is relatively concervative with their numbers. Drag strip times from members have shown that it 'can' do it in 4.2 if the conditions are just perfect. Most magazines etc have tested it at 4.5.

Being an Automatic, it's not too hard to get good launches, but it depends a lot on the surface of the road as well, since MB always puts relatively poor rims...

Sir_GT: I totally agree with you on that. MB probably will never try to take on Ferrari at their own game, never mind BMW who very much try to market their cars to the younger generation. I think MB doesn't really want to lose their current customers, so they'll continue to add automatics (a shame) and all the other gadgets they can. It's the kind of cars they sell. Whilst good for everyday use, one should get something a little bit more sporty if they want to have track fun (and I have plans to buy a 360 myself one day).

Yes, I'm an MB fan, and I might get defensive when talking about the SLK, but I still like Ferrari, BMW, etc I'd have no problems if someone told me "sorry, you can't have your SLK anymore, instead you must drive this CLS or CS", I'd still have plenty of fun in either car
__________________
My new car: MB SLK55 AMG (36months, 40,000miles and still flawless)
My old car: MB SLK230K Brabus - sold
Shinigami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2005, 05:38 AM   #23
LotusGT1
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,565
Default

As long as Mercedes keeps producing cars with automatic gearboxes like they do now (and there is no single indication they will do otherwise in the future) they don't produce cars that are an option when you look for a real sportscar IMO.
LotusGT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2005, 08:02 AM   #24
Sir_GT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
Default

I think the phrase "Sporty GT" pretty much sums up almost every car in the MB-AMG range. Which, of course, isn't a bad thing at all. Just a different kind of target market.

I mean hey, if I had £55k to spend, I would get an SLK55 as well.
__________________
Studio Gecko
Sir_GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2005, 02:06 AM   #25
sads
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 673
Default

I think this sounds like a great idea the SLK is one of the best looking Mercs around and to do a stripped out fast version is a great idea
__________________
People who quote "theres no replacement for displacement" have obviously never heard of power to weight.
sads is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2005, 06:10 PM   #26
neilo63
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 434
Default

Very nice package, definatley would have to get it in black though.
neilo63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2005, 09:21 AM   #27
Ghostbat
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
Default

Originally Posted by insane
I think they should develop a double clutch gearbox, like Audi has, so that not fitting manuals would have a real point.
Work in progress..
Ghostbat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump