10-25-2005, 11:45 PM
|
#31
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
|
^^ good point. Never noticed that, but yeah they are usually on the right.
__________________
my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
|
|
|
|
10-26-2005, 02:46 AM
|
#32
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
|
|
Originally Posted by crayzayjay
|
Originally Posted by ZfrkS62
i'm not 100% sure this is right.
|
The things that would lead me to believe that are
1) the alloys - they just look a bit too small for an M version
2) rear tyres - too narrow for an M
3) the interior - i know BMW doesnt make flashy interiors, but this one looks too 'normal'
As you say though, it does have 4 exhaust pipes....  |
Good points!
Well, the Ellipsoids that came w/ the 3.0i were already 18s. Those look like 18s in the picture. As far as the interior is concern, usually it is not much different, just a few splash of M here and there, like the pics. Steering wheel, shift knob, gauges, door sills, etc.
I like the interior though, nice simple clean matt black.
|
Originally Posted by gobs3z
I don't know if there's a criteria for the M-badge, but isn't the M supposed to be on the right side of the car and not the left?
|
Wow, very observant. That is definitely the case. It is always on the right side of the car, never have I seen it on the left. Then again this is "suppose" to be just a concept.
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2005, 06:56 AM
|
#33
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 948
|
IMO it looks like z4 3.0 with m sport package not like z4 m roadster. But overall design od car looks really good and specs of car is not bad.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2005, 04:33 PM
|
#34
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 787
|
Did anyone notice it has the old Michelin PS1s?? I agree about the car looking a bit dull, wouldn`t be surprised if it turns out much more agressive
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2005, 10:44 PM
|
#35
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
|
|
Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
|
Originally Posted by gobs3z
I don't know if there's a criteria for the M-badge, but isn't the M supposed to be on the right side of the car and not the left?
|
Well - there's the key slot for the trunk on the right - so I guess it was easier to put the M badge on the left instead of re-designing the whole trunk  |
the M badge would still go where the Z4 badge would go.
__________________
my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2005, 11:09 PM
|
#36
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
Utter Crap.
|
|
|
|
|
10-27-2005, 01:05 AM
|
#37
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
|
you don't really have anymore room to talk RC. The Z06 has now destroyed all your price range arguments the styling of the C6 isn't all that great if you ask me. The C2 and C5 are the sexiest Vettes. The C6 has dropped to the design quality of the rest of the GM lines 
__________________
my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
|
|
|
|
|
10-27-2005, 10:40 PM
|
#38
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 2,766
|
Z4M? about bloody time IMO! 
Nice to see they got the full M3 power in the roadster this time round.
VTEC?
Where we're going, Marty, we don't need VTEC!*
*Shamelessly hacked Back to the Future quote...
__________________
Current: 2008 BMW 118d SE, 2002 Honda S2000, 2007 Honda CBR600RR
Previous: 2003 Z4 3.0i SMG, 1995 Aprilia RS250
|
|
|
|
|
10-29-2005, 02:59 PM
|
#39
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
|
What happened to the Trunk Spoiler?
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2005, 01:22 PM
|
#40
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 787
|
I guess it`s optional and IMO looks much better without it.
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2005, 06:07 PM
|
#41
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 434
|
Love what BMW have done with the car, could have only wished for a widebody, but theres something nice about how under stated it looks. I'm sure it would go like the stink as expected.
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2005, 10:44 AM
|
#42
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Genève
Posts: 451
|
|
Originally Posted by schnell318
I guess it`s optional and IMO looks much better without it.
|
Optional or PS?
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
