2006 Subaru Impreza S204

[SPEEDCORE]

Evo interior better than STI?? hahahaha that is wat everyone complains about esp for the price. Whatever floats your boat...

I love the S202 and S203 this looks pretty mean too, pity I cant buy one

[sikx5]

Very nice! The car looks like a clean design, those wheels are extremley nice!!

Wish we could get these here, still rather a 22B though

[Evil-ution]

Originally Posted by SPEEDCORE Evo interior better than STI?? hahahaha that is wat everyone complains about esp for the price. Whatever floats your boat... I love the S202 and S203 this looks pretty mean too, pity I cant buy one

well atleast i got the chance to sit in both.. have a ride in both and i judged on what i saw i didn't base my opinion on what i read or hear.. or what ppl complain about

[Sachmo12345]

that car looks fantastic

[ferrarif1fan89]

ive never heard anything but bad things about evo interiors, but have actually heard the opposite bout the subaru interiors (atleast the newer ones). ive rented a lancer before, and thats basically the same interior (except for the recaros) and the fusebox lid fell off, the glovebox didnt open, the switches were worn away, the plastics were cheap, and it was ugly.

[leo_26782]

Originally Posted by Evil-ution Originally Posted by dingo Looks fantastic!!!! I'm sure its even better to drive with 320hp, me want one! Originally Posted by Evil-ution plus i don't know but i sat in a subaru b4, i feel there not good quality from the inside, and i guess the SAAB A\C's did make use ha :wank: what Subaru did you sit in? I think the quality is fine, it may not be luxurious but thats another issue really. the STi.. i feel the Evo is much better in quality and its more comftroble (i know these cars ain't made to make u relax), i felt the quality of it is less then the Evo, skyline and many other cars.. maybe am mistaken but thats what i felt..

I guess you don't buy these cars for there interiors, they are ok, not luxurious, but it doesn't fall apart.

What I don't agree with is the comfort: the Sub is much more comfortable to ride as it is less designed for a pure tack use, so the ride is impossible to compare IMO.

[Schwalbe]

I very like this STI version, the multiple additions that we can see on this pictures and others are really suitable for this powerful Scooby.

[leo_26782]

^ And it got a 2.0l turbochaged engine, and not one of those 2.5l turbo engine that are bracking part of the "idea" of the Impreza

[dingo]

Originally Posted by leo_26782 ^ And it got a 2.0l turbochaged engine, and not one of those 2.5l turbo engine that are bracking part of the "idea" of the Impreza

yes those of us who have the 2.0T engine need to stick together, plus our models look alot better too IMO.

The standard WRX just looks weak IMO, the STi is ok.......you really need something like this S203 to look aggressive if you have the new shape.

[leo_26782]

Originally Posted by dingo Originally Posted by leo_26782 ^ And it got a 2.0l turbochaged engine, and not one of those 2.5l turbo engine that are bracking part of the "idea" of the Impreza yes those of us who have the 2.0T engine need to stick together, plus our models look alot better too IMO. The standard WRX just looks weak IMO, the STi is ok.......you really need something like this S203 to look aggressive if you have the new shape.

The new shape looks good IMO, I really had some problems for the one that was between our models. But I agree ours look great

The real problem is: the STI doesn't have a 2.0 T engine :bad-words: :2gunfire:

[Evil-ution]

Originally Posted by leo_26782 Originally Posted by Evil-ution Originally Posted by dingo Looks fantastic!!!! I'm sure its even better to drive with 320hp, me want one! Originally Posted by Evil-ution plus i don't know but i sat in a subaru b4, i feel there not good quality from the inside, and i guess the SAAB A\C's did make use ha :wank: what Subaru did you sit in? I think the quality is fine, it may not be luxurious but thats another issue really. the STi.. i feel the Evo is much better in quality and its more comftroble (i know these cars ain't made to make u relax), i felt the quality of it is less then the Evo, skyline and many other cars.. maybe am mistaken but thats what i felt.. I guess you don't buy these cars for there interiors, they are ok, not luxurious, but it doesn't fall apart. What I don't agree with is the comfort: the Sub is much more comfortable to ride as it is less designed for a pure tack use, so the ride is impossible to compare IMO.

true you don't buy these cars for there interior i just wanted to add a point though i sat in both and what u said is true "again" about the comfort you get in both, i still think the Evo is a better place to sit in then the subaru..

[Evil-ution]

Originally Posted by ferrarif1fan89 ive never heard anything but bad things about evo interiors, but have actually heard the opposite bout the subaru interiors (atleast the newer ones). ive rented a lancer before, and thats basically the same interior (except for the recaros) and the fusebox lid fell off, the glovebox didnt open, the switches were worn away, the plastics were cheap, and it was ugly.

my friend rented a mazda 3 like 1 month ago, the stereo wasn't working, the gear was making a noise every time it changes, and when u use the tiptronic u can shift up but not down, the glovebox broke on him, the ride wasn't smooth @ all and finally it didn't brake well..

does that make the mazda 3 a cheap car? i guess we all know its better quality then its jap revals..

[dingo]

I found some high-res pics of this and also the S203 from last year :arrow: http://www.motorworld.net/forum/show...=587546#587546

[FoxFour]

Is this the new chassis? If so, the new Impreza will be coming here in the US next year. I see a little SAAB influence in the front end.