02-26-2004, 06:40 AM
|
#16
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Malaysia and Melbourne
Posts: 322
|
i wonder why didn't they use the CL65 engine. I bet that would've been even more powerful.
__________________
I'd like to thank my sponsors:
 
|
|
|
|
02-26-2004, 06:45 AM
|
#17
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Posts: 98
|
Yesterday I saw the C55 on TV. It looks pretty nice and his sound is impressive.
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2004, 06:51 AM
|
#18
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 980
|
|
Originally Posted by adlinyusman
i wonder why didn't they use the CL65 engine. I bet that would've been even more powerful.
|
probably coz' the CL65 engine (v12) can't be fit into the C-class engine bay 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2004, 06:52 AM
|
#19
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dubai
Posts: 752
|
Do you guys think that the C55 would beat the M3 in a lap time???
I remember that the C32 was far behind the M3... 
__________________
Live for the moment!
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2004, 07:03 AM
|
#20
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lat: -31 56.84 505 Long. 116.00.09 5 Australia
Posts: 2,855
|
|
Originally Posted by LotusGT1
Audi RS4 > Mercedes C55 Estate...
|
just what i was thinking, it's good to see they made it stick shift, i thought merc's seemed to be phasing out manual's with most of (to my knowlage) been auto tranmisions, and auto's in the mclaryn, and in the SLK's
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2004, 07:13 AM
|
#21
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: wonderland
Posts: 316
|
|
Originally Posted by adlinyusman
i wonder why didn't they use the CL65 engine. I bet that would've been even more powerful.
|
ofcourse it will be more powerful.. but cmon, its a c-class! would it really be necessary?
it'd look kinda silly having the 6.5 in the C, and the 5.5 in the E, woundn't it? overkill! 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2004, 10:10 AM
|
#22
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4
|
Maybe the C55 has the engine which has 350 horse power.
I think that it doesn't need to C-class.
C32 AMG is enough. I don't want more powerful C-class.
__________________
(-.-)a
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2004, 04:36 PM
|
#23
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK, Slovenia, Poland
Posts: 1,124
|
I have to say: as much as I love Mercedes, they are the masters of making completely pointless cars. :roll:
__________________
Perfection comes in the form of any Ferrari
|
|
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 06:14 PM
|
#24
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York City/Haverford, PA
Posts: 791
|
Hot! but wait till the new RS4...Benz's have too many electronics separating the driver and the road.
__________________
"You can get a lot much farther with a kind word and a gun, than you can with a kind word alone"
-Al capone
"Time is a versitile performer: it flies, marches, heals all wounds, runs out and will tell"
-Franklin Jones
^The definition of grip. Nav+Bose (standard) Arctic Silver on Blue, Heaven on Earth. '05 911 Turbo^
|
|
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 06:19 PM
|
#25
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 93
|
__________________
Back with another one of those block rockin' beats
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2004, 03:51 AM
|
#26
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: J-Town
Posts: 711
|
wow... nice!
thanks but i think i like the clk more...
but this is fine with me...nice headlamps
__________________
The power of GT- R
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
