American Cars Area dedicated to American Cars from Classic, Muscle, to Modern! |
12-30-2003, 01:43 PM
|
#1
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 498
|
05 Mustang Pics
__________________
"Well, we don't care how bad-ass some dude's naturally aspirated Honda S2000 motor is; if you go up against 900-plus pushrod ponies and 750 pounds of earth-shaking torque with a wrong-wheel-drive econobox, you're gonna get a fast and furious old-school ass-whipping."
-=Car Craft=-
|
|
|
12-30-2003, 01:55 PM
|
#2
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,184
|
man...that thing is hot !!!
__________________
|
|
|
12-30-2003, 01:57 PM
|
#3
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 498
|
I like the fact that they got rid of the stupid side vents and the hood scoop
__________________
"Well, we don't care how bad-ass some dude's naturally aspirated Honda S2000 motor is; if you go up against 900-plus pushrod ponies and 750 pounds of earth-shaking torque with a wrong-wheel-drive econobox, you're gonna get a fast and furious old-school ass-whipping."
-=Car Craft=-
|
|
|
12-30-2003, 02:05 PM
|
#4
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 438
|
i wish they made it look more like the shelby gt500 in the back. it would have been better with the, i think its called the duck tale, than the spoiler. the spoiler just makes it look cheap. but overall, i like it.
http://home.no.net/carpics/shelby/shelby-gt500.jpg
|
|
|
12-30-2003, 02:12 PM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Montevideo, Uruguay
Posts: 507
|
The only ford apart from the GT40 that looks awesome, and one that I would seriously think of buying...
I hope they threw away the separate chasis and finally got into the modern era of monocoque...
__________________
Cuore Sportivo, member of RKK club
|
|
|
12-30-2003, 02:37 PM
|
#6
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 498
|
I think that they are using the lincoln LS chassis, or some Jaguar one
__________________
"Well, we don't care how bad-ass some dude's naturally aspirated Honda S2000 motor is; if you go up against 900-plus pushrod ponies and 750 pounds of earth-shaking torque with a wrong-wheel-drive econobox, you're gonna get a fast and furious old-school ass-whipping."
-=Car Craft=-
|
|
|
12-30-2003, 02:46 PM
|
#7
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Brazil
Posts: 107
|
Oh man...this car is awesome...very hot!!
Thanks for the pics!!!
What´s the engine specification??
|
|
|
12-30-2003, 02:48 PM
|
#8
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 498
|
Im not sure yet, but the base engine will be a sohc 3V design. Or so I've heard
__________________
"Well, we don't care how bad-ass some dude's naturally aspirated Honda S2000 motor is; if you go up against 900-plus pushrod ponies and 750 pounds of earth-shaking torque with a wrong-wheel-drive econobox, you're gonna get a fast and furious old-school ass-whipping."
-=Car Craft=-
|
|
|
12-30-2003, 03:07 PM
|
#9
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,670
|
It looks awesome. I like how they redid the rear-end. The concepts rear end looked like shit. The only thing I dont like is that the concept had a lower wider looking profile than this one, which i prefered. But its still awesome. Cant wait for SVT's version!
|
|
|
12-30-2003, 03:16 PM
|
#10
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South East Asia
Posts: 226
|
Looks good but think it needs a bit more differentiation.. sorta looks a bit like a Nissan 200SX in a way.
|
|
|
12-30-2003, 03:26 PM
|
#11
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,670
|
Originally Posted by kramerman
Looks good but think it needs a bit more differentiation.. sorta looks a bit like a Nissan 200SX in a way.
|
If thats the case, than the 200SX looks like it because this car looks pretty damn close to a 67 stang and im sure the 200sx ur talking about wasnt made before 67'.
|
|
|
12-30-2003, 03:30 PM
|
#12
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
|
the V6 will be that, and probabl make around 205 horses, and little more lbs of torque, but the GTs should be around 300 ponies, and maybe 350 lbs of torque.
__________________
|
|
|
12-30-2003, 03:46 PM
|
#13
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
|
I prefer the concept rear, this one is too long. Crash test rules ?? Or chassis ?? and please, remove the rear wing . :roll:
__________________
|
|
|
12-30-2003, 04:22 PM
|
#14
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
|
damn when i wa typing that post about the 3V SOHC 3 post were made.
__________________
|
|
|
12-30-2003, 07:22 PM
|
#15
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Athens, Georgia or Los Angeles
Posts: 345
|
Its very pretty. If they get it right, props to Ford for reviving an aging classic.
Hopefully it'll be able to compete with the GTO (which is sweet in it own right).
__________________
Phil Hill, Kappa Sigma for life.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|