Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-16-2009, 03:46 AM   #16
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

QUick n dirty upload of the 79 Junkyard Camaro in action. the anemic 175bhp V8 is bumped to 197bhp 303lbftwith exhaust headers, air cleaner and rejetted carb and 100% stock tyres, suspension and 3541lbs weight.

0-60 6.9s, 0-100 18s, top speed 128mph, 60-0 145ft and 0.8 g's at 60mph

[youtube]thULY_iRnIA[/youtube]

Last edited by RC45; 12-16-2009 at 03:52 AM.
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 08:47 PM   #17
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Since we are so far off topic I figured I would keep going...



The JunkYard Z28 in repose, under acceleraiton and demonstrating 1979 braking prowess
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2009, 05:27 AM   #18
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Yet more mountain fun...

[youtube]Wvg3Erxd46Y[/youtube]
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 06:22 AM   #19
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

I need to work on creating the correct font for the Daytona car numbers... but this will do for now.



[youtube]g5fLmrcv9sk[/youtube]

Last edited by RC45; 12-20-2009 at 07:24 AM.
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 12:51 PM   #20
dutchmasterflex
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,566
Default

Originally Posted by RC45 View Post
QUick n dirty upload of the 79 Junkyard Camaro in action. the anemic 175bhp V8 is bumped to 197bhp 303lbftwith exhaust headers, air cleaner and rejetted carb and 100% stock tyres, suspension and 3541lbs weight.

0-60 6.9s, 0-100 18s, top speed 128mph, 60-0 145ft and 0.8 g's at 60mph

[youtube]thULY_iRnIA[/youtube]
I feel like that stock Camaro suspension would be showing the body roll a lot more than that. infact it looks flat as a plane ground around those mountain corners..
__________________
dutchmasterflex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 01:28 PM   #21
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by dutchmasterflex View Post
I feel like that stock Camaro suspension would be showing the body roll a lot more than that. infact it looks flat as a plane ground around those mountain corners..
Well, I am sure Turn 10 are modelling a NEW 1979 suspension, not an old wore out one - there is a fair amount of body roll, but I also believe it is being offset by the sever lack of grip. The more grip, the more body roll. Perhaps the lack of body roll is more of a damning of their tyre model than the anything else...

...or perhaps you are expecting a 1979 Camaro to suck a lot more thna it does LOL.

I might redo the car with a full upgraded suspension set to full soft to mirror a wore out 30 year old suspension.
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 12:06 PM   #22
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

I figured it might be more useful to start a new thread instead of continuing to clutter the GT-R 4 sale thread

http://www.motorworld.net/forum/show...554#post872554

By popular request (sort of) - a more "realistic" 1979 Z28 handling setup...



[youtube]TDkZLnoywSQ[/youtube]
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 12:16 PM   #23
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

"moved"
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump