Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-19-2004, 12:38 AM   #1
graywolf624
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
Default WTF? breathalizers required on cars?

New Mexico is considering a law that would make all drivers exhale into an alcohol detection device in their cars before they could start the engine.



The New Mexico House of Representatives on Monday passed a bill to require an ignition lock that will prevent a car from starting if the driver fails a breath test. The bill is being debated this week in the state's Senate.


New Mexico has one of the highest rates of fatalities caused by driving under the influence in the United States and the bill would mandate the ignition lock to be installed in all cars sold or registered in the state by 2009.


One of the devices available now costs about $1,000. It works by requiring a driver to blow into a tube that detects the presence of alcohol. If no alcohol is detected, then the car's ignition unlocks.


"It's not just about prosecuting criminals but stopping drunk driving before it starts," said Ken Martinez, a Democratic representative who sponsored the bill.


Critics of the bill called the cost of the device prohibitive, adding the measure would penalize people who do not drink and drive by forcing them to buy an expensive gadget.


According to advocacy group Mothers Against Drunk Driving, New Mexico ranked fifth among U.S. states in the percentage of traffic fatalities caused by drunk drivers.


"People called seat belts and air bags inconvenient at first but it's just an issue of getting used to it. I think in the long run it will save money and lives," Martinez said.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...ife_alcohol_dc

Idiots. I can imagine the first time someone cant start there car to drive someone to the hospital things would get interesting. It's set to not start the car for anything over .03. I'd be suprised if nyquil didn't set it off. Not to mention 1000 dollars more on the resale of a used car.
graywolf624 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 12:55 AM   #2
oscargarza88
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston but from Mty
Posts: 2,113
Default

hhahahaaha
ive heard about this but just to special people that had been caught driving drunk but to all the cars?! thats too much
and if ur drunk y could just tell another person to blow for u.
__________________
Originally Posted by TT
we have a superb community full of great friends always ready to face any kind of menace .. and win of course
Nuff Said
oscargarza88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 01:03 AM   #3
levensnevel
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellevoetsluis, the Netherlands
Posts: 781
Default

So you ask someone who hasn't drank to exhale into that alcohol detection device...
Plan simply won't work
__________________

Niets of niemand zegt dat het echt moet
En toch, of juist daarom,wil je het beleven....

Weblog
levensnevel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 01:07 AM   #4
altezza
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 980
Default

http://www.madd.ca/news/n030518.htm

I think this device should only be used in cars that are owned by repeated drink and drive offenders (just like this program in Ontario)
mandatory installation of this device on all cars is just plain stupid :roll:
__________________
altezza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 01:09 AM   #5
oscargarza88
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston but from Mty
Posts: 2,113
Default

Originally Posted by levensnevel
So you ask someone who hasn't drank to exhale into that alcohol detection device...
Plan simply won't work
thats what i said, but i also heard that u have to breath in it every 10 mins or something like that, if not the car will turn off, so that will b a little more touble... but u can always take an oxygen tank with u
__________________
Originally Posted by TT
we have a superb community full of great friends always ready to face any kind of menace .. and win of course
Nuff Said
oscargarza88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 01:10 AM   #6
altezza
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 980
Default

Originally Posted by oscargarza88
hhahahaaha
if ur drunk y could just tell another person to blow for u.
this method won't work...
"To discourage participating motorists from using a sober person to start their cars, the Interlock system demands more breath samples at random intervals during car trips."

or if your friend isn't drunk... why don't just ask him to drive you home
__________________
altezza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 01:23 AM   #7
gigdy
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Baltimore, Md
Posts: 2,221
Default

Originally Posted by altezza
Originally Posted by oscargarza88
hhahahaaha
if ur drunk y could just tell another person to blow for u.
this method won't work...
"To discourage participating motorists from using a sober person to start their cars, the Interlock system demands more breath samples at random intervals during car trips."
Thats how the system works now but even if the rediculous bill passes i dont think that would go with it.
__________________
gigdy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 01:33 AM   #8
rift321
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 35
Default

so you're saying driving drunk is illegal?
__________________
"The suspension must always be faster than the engine."
rift321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 01:42 AM   #9
levensnevel
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellevoetsluis, the Netherlands
Posts: 781
Default

Well,

suppose it's illegal on public roads :fadein:
__________________

Niets of niemand zegt dat het echt moet
En toch, of juist daarom,wil je het beleven....

Weblog
levensnevel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 03:54 AM   #10
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Then people will die in head on collisions as the approaching driver tries to grab the "blow tube" - and in the ensuing chaos drifts into the oncoming lane... just about the most stupid f**king idea ever conceived...
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 06:33 AM   #11
TT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
Default

The image of ppl having to constantly giving head while driving to keep the car turned on is hilarious LMAO!!

Anyway since I never touch alchool, would be ok for me (the single blow when you enter the car maybe... )
__________________
TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 07:55 AM   #12
Gnome
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 220
Default

In Norway the same has been proposed for all busses, trams, subways and other passenger traffic. That seems reasonable, but installing these systems in all vehicles is a bit too much.

And the need to blow more than once does not improve traffic safety!
__________________
Gnome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 08:22 AM   #13
T-Bird
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 3,627
Default Re: WTF? breathalizers required on cars?

Originally Posted by graywolf624
Idiots. I can imagine the first time someone cant start there car to drive someone to the hospital things would get interesting. It's set to not start the car for anything over .03. I'd be suprised if nyquil didn't set it off. Not to mention 1000 dollars more on the resale of a used car.
It's been proven that Nyquil or anything like it won't set off breathelizers many times now.
T-Bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2004, 12:58 PM   #14
Garretts_turbo
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, Mi
Posts: 727
Default

jeesh. i can only hope it doesnt make it to regular production cars....ugh....
we have a program like that where i live but only for people who are repeat offenders and such. seems to me that bringing a friend along with you is the easiest way to get around it, although i am in no way approving drunk driving! thats what caused the wreck that totaled my truck grrrrrr.....
__________________
www.kzoorice.com
Garretts_turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2004, 04:27 PM   #15
graywolf624
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
Default

It's been proven that Nyquil or anything like it won't set off breathelizers many times now.
Actually it will if you set the bar low enough for percent of body. (nyquil and mouthwash both contain alcohol). This is why often times if it isn't obvious they will also do a blood analysis (aka your really close to the line and seem completely sober).

.03 is close to that range.

Mouthwash does as well. I should know, my mother is a nurse and I have 4 cousins that are police men. (and people wonder why I make sure to stay out of trouble.

Furthermore, even more scary. A really small number of the population... something well below .01 percent.. have a body makeup that makes these read higher then 0.
graywolf624 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump