motor

HarryCASI · 02-02-2007, 01:42 AM

more from him :arrow: Corvette, M3, Supra, Targa 4S

, 407 Coupe (quite a disputed looking but i like it)

Stoopie · 02-02-2007, 07:55 AM

Nice shots

I drove the ML63 AMG 2 days ago, that thing is simply a heavy monster :shock:

HarryCASI · 02-02-2007, 08:02 AM

^^^
so which one do you prefer ML63 or Cayenne Turbo S?

Stoopie · 02-02-2007, 08:08 AM

Well I haven't driven the Turbo S, so I can't really say. The ML63 AMG has 4 hp less than the Turbo S (517 vs 521) so that won't really be the difference, but the difference is probably in the weight I guess. The Turbo S weighs 2355 kg and the ML63 AMG weighs 2210 kg.. If I'd go for the looks, I'd go for the ML63 AMG, it looks way more brutal than the Cayenne IMO. And the seats of the MB are just great, you're really being held in the car by them (ofcourse

), they just won't let you go! And then there's the acceleration of the MB.. That car sure is fast for such a heavyweight!

HarryCASI · 02-02-2007, 08:14 AM

^^^
haha both of them are far too mad for me

and i'd rather have a proper off-roader and a proper sportscar

Stoopie · 02-02-2007, 08:20 AM

^ Perhaps the Brabus G V12?

Well it only goes 230 km/h, but still it's a beast

1006 Nm :shock:

HarryCASI · 02-02-2007, 08:27 AM

^^^
well i think a Range Rover is quite enough for me, it can just fit in any surroundings

Stoopie · 02-02-2007, 08:38 AM

^ About that, the car that was behind me when I drove the ML63 was a Range Rover (supercharged) with another chauffeur in it. So I could've driven that car, but I got there first and I'm happy with what I got

Anyway, he said the Range Rover was real comfortable to drive and of course had lots of power, but he said he really had to get used to the size of that thing, it's really long and pretty wide too..