12-05-2005, 10:04 PM
|
#16
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 736
|
^? i dont see the problem
__________________
|
|
|
12-05-2005, 10:09 PM
|
#17
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
|
Originally Posted by bmagni
fuck you BMW !!! i used to love you and then came that thing called turbo... i pray its not include in the next gen M3
|
The M's will be N/A.
This isn't the first time BMW has used a turbo for their gas engines. Just look at it this way, now BMW can pound Mercedes in every aspect
__________________
my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
|
|
|
12-05-2005, 10:49 PM
|
#18
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 3,544
|
Originally Posted by ZfrkS62
Originally Posted by bmagni
fuck you BMW !!! i used to love you and then came that thing called turbo... i pray its not include in the next gen M3
|
The M's will be N/A.
This isn't the first time BMW has used a turbo for their gas engines. Just look at it this way, now BMW can pound Mercedes in every aspect
|
nice to know bout M's
yeah, i know but it isnt right, i love NA's... not turbos...
|
|
|
12-06-2005, 01:19 PM
|
#19
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
|
The car looks hideous. Sorry. It's not eye-catching or remarkable at all. Worst 3-series ever IMO.
Audi's RS4 will definitely be far better looking than the next M3. BMW better come up with some real substance, otherwise I expect the sales figures to tip towards the RS4's favour.
|
|
|
12-06-2005, 02:25 PM
|
#20
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The Basque Country
Posts: 1,459
|
Exactly, the pioneer of the 3 series was the 2002 (the model shown by Dani) and as far as I know it was even the first car which introduced the turbo
On the other hand, actually I dont like the current 3 series coupe too much...although it looks better than the 7 series, the 1 series or the 6 series its clearly a step backward compared to the E46, although IMO the E36 is much more beautiful than the E46
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 03:53 AM
|
#21
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 673
|
I like this idea I mean BMW make some of the sweetes NA engines on the planet so why not make turbo version of one them? But I think the new S4 is so sweet that buyers will look straght past it they need to get the new M3 out
__________________
People who quote "theres no replacement for displacement" have obviously never heard of power to weight.
|
|
|
12-10-2005, 07:29 PM
|
#22
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
|
latest info
"To all intent and purpose: The new BMW 3-series Coupe."
"Artists take their inspiration to canvas, ours take theirs to the road."
"Where dynamism and efficiency can now be used in the same sentence."
"Performance without penalty."
"3.0-liter six-cylinder engine with direct injection and turbo charging."
330 PS
The embargo still on. Even on Monday and further. Sorry.
But the major BMW distributors and press are still getting the press kit this week.
Expect first teasers in auto press.
|
|
|
12-10-2005, 08:12 PM
|
#23
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sofia (Bulgaria)
Posts: 565
|
Originally Posted by Just_me
latest info
"To all intent and purpose: The new BMW 3-series Coupe."
"Artists take their inspiration to canvas, ours take theirs to the road."
"Where dynamism and efficiency can now be used in the same sentence."
"Performance without penalty."
"3.0-liter six-cylinder engine with direct injection and turbo charging."
330 PS
|
Shall the force be with you...
__________________
|
|
|
12-30-2005, 08:31 PM
|
#24
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The Basque Country
Posts: 1,459
|
Anyway, I see quite a bit of contradiction if BMW introduces some turbo since the BMW president has been boasting many many times that BMW is capable of making engines which produces a similar amount of power and torque to the supercharged engines (he was refering to Audi and Merc) but with the aspirated engines
And naturally the turbo engines will ruin his comments; see what happens anyway
|
|
|
12-31-2005, 08:29 PM
|
#25
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,545
|
I´m quite surprised that the Coupe is getting such a strong new engine. The magazines i read did not have this info strangely...
|
|
|
01-01-2006, 06:14 PM
|
#26
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
|
0-60 in 6 seconds seems kind of slow for a 330bhp car.
|
|
|
01-02-2006, 12:55 AM
|
#27
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Monterey(Home)/Irvine(School), California
Posts: 989
|
I don't think the car can possibly have a 6 second 0-60 time if it has 330hp ae86_16v. That would make it slower than the previous and current generation 330i, which just would not make any sense at all.
__________________
|
|
|
01-02-2006, 01:44 AM
|
#28
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
|
Originally Posted by Zot09
I don't think the car can possibly have a 6 second 0-60 time if it has 330hp ae86_16v. That would make it slower than the previous and current generation 330i, which just would not make any sense at all.
|
I know, all I am saying is that is what the article is speculating that it'll be around 6 seconds for 0-60 miles per hour. And yes that is pretty slow. So I guess it must be pretty heavy then.
"BMW's published number for the E46 330i is 6.4 with manual. It's down to 5.9 with the Performance Package (ZHP). The recently published number from BMW for the E90 is 6.1 with manual. No mention yet of a Performance Package."
|
|
|
01-02-2006, 03:47 PM
|
#29
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
|
335i will do 0-100 in 5.5 sec according to BMW pressrelease. I bet carmags will get better times than that, just like they did with M5/M6.
|
|
|
01-02-2006, 04:19 PM
|
#30
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 3,544
|
Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
0.5 seconds faster to 60mph with the 'performance package'?? what does it include?? as far as I know... there was not a power increase
|
it had 241 hp if im not wrong, and the normal had 230... something like that, bigger tires, less weight, better suspension... and M bodykits
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|