Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-21-2005, 03:38 PM   #16
blah
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
Default

Also ive never even a TT get called a sports car in any review. The Z3 would eat the TT anyday.
__________________
blah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 04:01 PM   #17
MaxPayneCocktail
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: California, USA
Posts: 61
Default

I'd take a Lamborghini anyday.
__________________
Site is still under tremendous construction:
http://www.geocities.com/sfbayarea_autoshows/index.html
Tell me how you like it and/or give me suggestions.

PM: maxpaynecocktail
AIM: maxpayneberetta
YIM: maxpaynecocktail
E-Mail-1: [email protected]
E-Mail-2: [email protected]
MaxPayneCocktail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 04:21 PM   #18
blah
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by insane
And Z3's are driven by people that don't know shit about cars. Besides everything else, it's one of the ugliest sports cars in the world. I'd take a TT over it any day.
The Z3 looks way better than a TT. The TT is heavy and gay. Its a bull dyke basically.
__________________
blah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 05:08 PM   #19
gigdy
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Baltimore, Md
Posts: 2,221
Default

Ok so why wouldnt they have towed the car before they started construction?
__________________
gigdy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 07:37 PM   #20
MaxPayneCocktail
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: California, USA
Posts: 61
Default

BMW Z3:
http://bmvnasko.hit.bg/bmw-z3-2.jpg

Audi TT:
http://www.allsportauto.com/photoaut...attro_04_m.jpg

Lamborghini Diablo SE30 Jota:
http://www.geocities.com/sfbayarea_a...loSE30Jota.jpg

The order:
1. Lamborghini Diablo SE30 Jota
2. BMW Z3
3. Audi TT
__________________
Site is still under tremendous construction:
http://www.geocities.com/sfbayarea_autoshows/index.html
Tell me how you like it and/or give me suggestions.

PM: maxpaynecocktail
AIM: maxpayneberetta
YIM: maxpaynecocktail
E-Mail-1: [email protected]
E-Mail-2: [email protected]
MaxPayneCocktail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 08:57 PM   #21
Yablokov
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Russian living in America-.-
Posts: 445
Default

They respect the BMW and will leave it there, now if it were an AUDI they would of done everyone a favor and killed it.
kiss my ass blah.

audi are cars
__________________
My car atm: Honda Civic EX 1998

Cars I have beaten in real races:
Honda Accord LX 1992
lil' bros Go-Kart
Yablokov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2005, 05:38 AM   #22
blah
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by insane
Originally Posted by blah
Originally Posted by insane
And Z3's are driven by people that don't know shit about cars. Besides everything else, it's one of the ugliest sports cars in the world. I'd take a TT over it any day.
The Z3 looks way better than a TT. The TT is heavy and gay. Its a bull dyke basically.
Is gay the only word you know?

In personal expirience, if somone wants a car that will go fast they buy a TT, if they want something to show off or to do a sunday drive in the country they buy a Z3. But situations are different in different places. I'd rather end this quite pointless argument.
If you want a car that goes fast you dont get a 15 second TT, you get a M-Roadster.


Brembo so because its made in the US its a bad car? Are we forgetting that AUDI doesnt even make a current car right now that can beat a Corvette?
__________________
blah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2005, 03:17 PM   #23
blah
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
Default

Well i would compare the M-Roadster to a Fast TT but they dont make one. What would you like me to compare the M-Roadster to, the RS4??? Its not even in the same class. Fine, even the Z3 3.0 is faster than the TT, is that a better comparison for you?
__________________
blah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2005, 03:20 PM   #24
blah
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
Default

Also you saying i dont have logic makes no sense, when you are talking about lambo. What does lambo have to do with anything. No AUDI didnt make lambo better. Lambos are now overweight, slow, and they are bieng drivin more and more by tools who buy the stupid E-Gear shit thining they are cool. What happen to the days where it took a real driver to drive a lambo?
__________________
blah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2005, 08:56 PM   #25
blah
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
Default

THe BMW will outhandle the AUDI. .7 seconds is alot of time. Also please stop with that less cylinders BS. Thats a ricer excuse. The TT has Forced induction, which makes up for the smaller displacement and cylinders. So dont use that as an excuse. Quattro does not insure better handling. Nothing will replace 50/50 weight and RWD. If you odnt think .7 seconds is alot of time you are loosing it

Now when you compare the Z4 againest the current TT it gets even worse.
__________________
blah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2005, 09:00 PM   #26
blah
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
Default

Every single review i have found of the Z3 call it the Enthuisiast car. I have driven one, it is raw, it is driver and machine thats it.
__________________
blah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2005, 09:01 PM   #27
blah
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by brembo
LOL so now there is a replacement for deplacement......

jupp blah you really got it down.....

I think we should talk when you have driven some Audi`s with some attitude, you obviously havnt yet......

give me a notice when you have tried, not only talked.....like posers does.....
AUDIs with Attitude, so basically dont drive a TT???

You know what brembo. This weekend i will go drive an S4 for both of us, im sure ill enjoy it since i think its a good car, but i will drive it for you.
__________________
blah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2005, 09:06 PM   #28
blah
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by brembo
Originally Posted by blah
Every single review i have found of the Z3 call it the Enthuisiast car. I have driven one, it is raw, it is driver and machine thats it.
I have driven several Z3`s including the M roadster and i do not deny they can be fun to drive when that tail is out there, but I also have driven several TT`s and they give me just as much fun if not more, and when winter comes the TT are still ripping it up while the Z becomes a garage queen.......
We dont have winter in So-Cal.
__________________
blah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2005, 10:47 PM   #29
Yablokov
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Russian living in America-.-
Posts: 445
Default

lol, im glad there are peeps defending Audi.
Audi is a great car.
its inexpensive (compared to other luxury cars)
its got great handling
its got great engines
great power

bottem line= they are Great Cars!
__________________
My car atm: Honda Civic EX 1998

Cars I have beaten in real races:
Honda Accord LX 1992
lil' bros Go-Kart
Yablokov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2005, 11:10 PM   #30
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

The non-M Z3's are hairdresser pussy cars.

Period.



Not that the TT roadster is exactly a manly car though..

The coupe is a slightly more butch...

Think of it as the dyke of euro coupes..
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump