Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-25-2005, 12:01 PM   #16
TransAm
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 2,766
Default

Originally Posted by saadie
or 2 V6's
inline

__________________
Current: 2008 BMW 118d SE, 2002 Honda S2000, 2007 Honda CBR600RR

Previous: 2003 Z4 3.0i SMG, 1995 Aprilia RS250
TransAm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2005, 12:30 PM   #17
gigdy
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Baltimore, Md
Posts: 2,221
Default

Originally Posted by dutchmasterflex
just to point out another obvious fact.. when you join 2 v6's you get a W12 engine.. (ie volkswagen) to get a V12 you combine 2 inline 6 engines..
or you could connect the engines end to end making a v12.
mmmm logic.

Originally Posted by Gnome
A turbo charger and a jet engine are similar from a mechanical point of view. You can even use a large turbo to make a jet engine. I gues that's what has confused the author.
they are similar in the same way that they are similar to a fan. which really doesnt mean anything.
__________________
gigdy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2005, 02:43 PM   #18
dutchmasterflex
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,566
Default

d'oh.

excuse stupidity... i'm starting to go insane
__________________
dutchmasterflex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2005, 02:58 PM   #19
DeMoN
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,106
Default

Im gonna hate the day when Petrol does not run our cars. Imagine losing the sound we are so used to hearing now in powerplanted cars.
__________________
Guess who's Back!
DeMoN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2005, 03:35 AM   #20
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

Originally Posted by saadie
^^ NO ... dude .. a jet engine is a combustion engine .... a supercharger or a turbo charger is just a a compressor .... ..
thats one of the lamest thing i've ever heard .. no offence ...
well, i hate to prove you wrong...
have you ever heard of a tesla turbine?
varioius projects have been completed turning a turbo-charger into a tesla-style turbine engine...
more information about telsa turbine theory is here
http://www.frank.germano.com/teslaturbine.htm
http://www.pulse-jets.com/
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2005, 01:24 PM   #21
coombsie66
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: somerset/london
Posts: 1,636
Default

Originally Posted by nthfinity
Originally Posted by saadie
^^ NO ... dude .. a jet engine is a combustion engine .... a supercharger or a turbo charger is just a a compressor .... ..
thats one of the lamest thing i've ever heard .. no offence ...
well, i hate to prove you wrong...
have you ever heard of a tesla turbine?
varioius projects have been completed turning a turbo-charger into a tesla-style turbine engine...
more information about telsa turbine theory is here
http://www.frank.germano.com/teslaturbine.htm
http://www.pulse-jets.com/
Yeah, its actually incredibly easy to make a jet engine from a turbocharger. Just whack a combustion chamber between the compressor and the turbine, pass high pressure high mass flow rate air through the comressor entrance, feed fuel to the combustion chamber, spark her up, and away you go!
A gas turbine engine is an Axial version of an automotive centrifugal turbocharger with the combustion chamber in the middle, and usually a series of compressor and turbine stages.

Eat your words saadie, you just jumped off the deep end with no fucking arm bands!
__________________
coombsie66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 09:13 PM   #22
ferrarif1fan89
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,420
Default

i dont belive a jet engine has any moving parts, it just compresses air to a very highpressure and temperature and shoots it out the back. pardon my stupid explanation. :roll:
__________________
ferrarif1fan89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 09:59 PM   #23
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

i dont belive a jet engine has any moving parts, it just compresses air to a very highpressure and temperature and shoots it out the back. pardon my stupid explanation.
ram-jets have no moving parts, and require special fluid dynamics upon start-up... and have higher efficiancy at speed then a turbine engine.
a turbine jet engine is an axial compressor, which is how they generate mroe then just thrust based power.

ill scan in some material for you...
edit:
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2005, 02:43 AM   #24
browney
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 9
Default

Originally Posted by Gnome
A turbo charger and a jet engine are similar from a mechanical point of view. You can even use a large turbo to make a jet engine. I gues that's what has confused the author.
At first I was thinking that this made no sense, but then it occured to me that if you combusted fuel on the exaust side of the turbine, then you do have something similar to a gas turbine engine, I supose..
browney is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump