08-26-2005, 06:37 PM
|
#16
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
Oh - it's only 300 odd hp?
Pathetic - they are about 150hp and 5 years to late to join the 300hp party... someone needs to let them know that generic Korean SUV's ship with 300hp
|
|
|
08-26-2005, 06:48 PM
|
#17
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Guadalajara, Mexico
Posts: 2,306
|
Dull and absolutely uninspired like all bmw's
IMO looks good, but needed something more, not the talk of Tom...
"flowing evolution..."
"hyundai amalgomated..."
" the name itself is hardly unique"
"most base generic term"
"bloodline right back to the E-type"
sorry Tom... but seems I was reading/listening to a poshy and cultural-wanna-be in an art show 
stopo watching those cultural and art shows. They spoil you not allowing you to express correctly "crickey, drop dead..., bloddy"
|
|
|
08-26-2005, 07:07 PM
|
#18
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Prius land ... :(=
Posts: 393
|
Is it a Jaguar? The front lights are really ugly (Hyundai?) and the interior is not Jag at all: lots of plastic which I bet will be bad quality...
|
|
|
08-26-2005, 07:39 PM
|
#19
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
|
Oohh...all of you make such good points. I have to say, it's not as striking as the concept and the concept ruined the element of "surprise!", but it think it looks fine, if not great. It has all the proper proportions (at least on the pictures). all the details look fine and the shape is really pleasing. but i'll still have to look at it with my own eyes...and touch the sheetmetal...that always sends tingles to my brain...
the cabin looks great
...that 4.2 badge looks absolutely cheap...oops, from another picture not posted here
__________________
|
|
|
08-26-2005, 07:40 PM
|
#20
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: W.Yorks England
Posts: 1,266
|
|
Originally Posted by antonioledesma
Dull and absolutely uninspired like all bmw's
IMO looks good, but needed something more, not the talk of Tom...
"flowing evolution..."
"hyundai amalgomated..."
" the name itself is hardly unique"
"most base generic term"
"bloodline right back to the E-type"
sorry Tom... but seems I was reading/listening to a poshy and cultural-wanna-be in an art show 
stopo watching those cultural and art shows. They spoil you not allowing you to express correctly "crickey, drop dead..., bloddy"

|
just because your weened up on a mix of shit american telly doesnt mean its wrong to use decent english every now and then.
__________________
|
|
|
08-26-2005, 08:36 PM
|
#21
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
|
good news, Top Gear Magazine will include a promotional DVD in the October issue...but of course, the readers in US will probably not get them.
__________________
|
|
|
08-26-2005, 08:39 PM
|
#22
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 240
|
It doesnt really grab me at all. IMO it is not that stylish, the DB9 looks much better and for the price of this car, i dont see how anyone could consider it, theres nothing 'special' about it unless you love Jags. Thats just me talking but I wont completly bash it until its reviews
|
|
|
08-26-2005, 08:48 PM
|
#23
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Guadalajara, Mexico
Posts: 2,306
|
|
Originally Posted by topgeartom
just because your weened up on a mix of shit american telly doesnt mean its wrong to use decent english every now and then.
|
no, don't watch too much american telly, but more than british. I only get BBC world here and... omg... infinite channels with american shows.
If you really write like that, I would gladly read more of your works. It's always nice to read more word than "niiice, great dude" and everything I post
|
|
|
08-27-2005, 12:22 AM
|
#24
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
|
__________________
|
|
|
08-27-2005, 12:56 AM
|
#25
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Guadalajara, Mexico
Posts: 2,306
|
it's a great site HeilSvenska
I'll stay there for some hours
|
|
|
08-27-2005, 01:37 AM
|
#26
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Yorkshire Lad... in Brisbane Australia - oh dear
Posts: 101
|
the only thing wrong with the lights is the fact that they swoop back to make an angle (which is what incidently alot of jap car co's do) thus looking like a El-Cheapo jap car, if they had rounded them forward (like the old XKR or XK8) even though it would look the same it'd still be damn fine, ah well work in progress i guess
sadly they did the same theme with the tailights so that from the side they look like a number mercedes, however looking straight on the back their a bit of an eye catcher.
as for the interiror i was initially impressed by the design, big improvement from the over worked and confusing XKR, it just looks more refined... i just hope they didnt use plastic.....
|
|
|
08-27-2005, 01:43 AM
|
#27
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boston/Kansas City
Posts: 546
|
Love it! Obviously more engine power will come.
|
|
|
08-27-2005, 10:05 AM
|
#28
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 3,371
|
I'm not too fond of the styling considering these pics. There are bit too much resemblenses with the latest AM designs. Maybe thats cause Ian Cullum designed it. It should have looked a bit more Jag.
|
Originally Posted by ferrarif1fan89
i cant beleive! theres no j-gate!
|
I still can see the J-shape a bit  Though the 5-4-3-2 blocking points for the manual selection of the gears are replaced with a +/- paddles behind the steering wheel , like on the XK180.
|
|
|
08-27-2005, 05:33 PM
|
#29
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
|
|
Originally Posted by antonioledesma
|
Originally Posted by topgeartom
just because your weened up on a mix of shit american telly doesnt mean its wrong to use decent english every now and then.
|
no, don't watch too much american telly, but more than british. I only get BBC world here and... omg... infinite channels with american shows.
If you really write like that, I would gladly read more of your works. It's always nice to read more word than "niiice, great dude" and everything I post

|
Your ignorance of European cultures shines like the sun, at noon, over the mexican desert.
There's nothing "posh" at all about crikey, bloody, and the rest of the UK-sourced expressions. The majority of the UK isn't what the Americans lead you to believe: i.e. posh, snobby, and ride horses with their noses turned up.
Maybe you should try travelling abroad sometime. You might just enjoy it.
Or your brain might just overdose on the reality of the real world, and you would just tip over and die.
Anyway, back to topic: Even after visiting the marketing machine-slash-website, my opinion still hasn't changed. It's dull. It's a big disappointment. It is just so glaringly obvious that Jaguar played it safe with the XK, just like Ford did with the new Focus, and ended up with something that isn't really sexy, doesn't really have any presence, and lacks any imagination at all.
It's a dull car. Period. And it's going to take a lot of effort from Top Gear and rest of the UK car magazines to sell this thing outside of the UK.
|
|
|
08-27-2005, 05:46 PM
|
#30
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rotterdam, Holland, EU
Posts: 3,767
|
sorry to disappoint you TGT, but hte front lights do remind me of a Hyundai's...and the rest does indeed remind me of Aston Martins, although the original XKR/XK8 also looked alot like the DB7.
now there's a car they should've produced, it was one of the best looking concepts ever!
__________________
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|