Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-30-2005, 05:31 PM   #16
jon_s
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,381
Default

Oooh, don't know that Zippo. I know Ford do the same trick. For example the new Focus St has a 'duratec'. Odd seeing as it is a volvo engine lol

I'll ask.... I have a VAG guru helping me.

The A4 is a step down in terms of size, so we will have to put up with the leg room. We will have a looks at a few dealers to get a feel for the cars.

Should be fun test driving!
jon_s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2005, 06:08 PM   #17
LotusGT1
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,565
Default

I'd get an A6 then...
__________________
LotusGT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2005, 08:04 PM   #18
No.1
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 3,224
Default

Originally Posted by jon_s

The A4 is a step down in terms of size, so we will have to put up with the leg room. We will have a looks at a few dealers to get a feel for the cars.
I found leg room a major problem - sitting behind a six-footer, me at 5'11" was cramped!

The A4 is terrible in that respect, though if the seat backs have been scupted in this recent face-lift, then the problem should be minimised.
__________________
No.1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2005, 09:10 PM   #19
No.1
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 3,224
Default

Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
And as for the pre-reg cars... my 'old' Selespeed was one of them (I bought it with 23,000km)... and it had all the problems a car can have - thanks God it had a two year full warranty :roll: from then on... I'll always go for brand new cars, except 'oldies' like the E30 M3
Wait a minute - Selespeed - isn't that an Alfa?

Now that's just asking for trouble
__________________
No.1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2005, 11:49 PM   #20
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

^^^^ That's the Alfa I know and expect...
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 05:45 AM   #21
jon_s
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,381
Default

Haha, Alfa warranties are worth their weight in gold!

I only notice the black Audi being the old version last night lol, but it is so damn mean! We are going to look for a car with slightly less miles than the silver one. We would only get the face lift version (mum is one of those we must have the latest sitting on the drive :roll: lol)

Anyway, we have a month before our money is released from the markets, so plenty of time to look and test drive various cars. We are certainly not going to get pushed into that supposed 'dream car'.
jon_s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 01:02 PM   #22
TransAm
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 2,766
Default

Sounds like you're approaching this very sensibly! I know what you mean about wanting to know everything about the car before you walk into the dealership, it's amazing how little some salespeople know about the products they are selling. Of course, they'll tell you anything to get you to buy from them.

One notable exception, a car supermarket place I went to in Exeter, I was looking at a Probe V6 (it was a long time ago, ok?) the salesman was very honest and steered me away from the car due to it's crap MPG. Tried to then sell me a 620Ti but there ya go lol.
__________________
Current: 2008 BMW 118d SE, 2002 Honda S2000, 2007 Honda CBR600RR

Previous: 2003 Z4 3.0i SMG, 1995 Aprilia RS250
TransAm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 04:19 PM   #23
lorbmw69
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Burlington, VT/Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 146
Default

that is bad news about the saab. but are you sure it's not due to sludging? we have a 9-5 and it had the same problem, total engine/turbo rebuild at 55,000 miles (just after the warranty ended) it turns out that there is a problem 2.3 turbo engine and they extended the warranty to 100,00 miles? check out the saab website and ask the dealer. at least you could have it fixed at no charge and get some money back. good luck!
__________________
Cleveland Rocks!

1995 Saab 900 Turbo
lorbmw69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2006, 01:03 PM   #24
Wutputt
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 3,371
Default

Sad to hear about the Saab! Speaking of which, ours also failed today. The engine wouldn't crank. I only heard a clicking sound and all electrics were flickering on the same frequency. I'm guessing it's just the battery so that will be fixed soon.



Originally Posted by jon_s
The A4 is a step down in terms of size, so we will have to put up with the leg room. We will have a looks at a few dealers to get a feel for the cars.
Going from a 9-5 to an A4 is big step backwards considering rear legroom. At least that's my experience. It's really cramped on the back seats of an A4 IMO. That's no problem if small kids are sitting there. But it isn't that suited for big adults. Maybe you should check out for a slightly taller but also older car to keep within the budget and keeping sufficient rear legroom?



Originally Posted by 1zippo1
Btw, the 2.0 TFSi, is it really an FSi engine? because I read that audi labelled some of their petrol engines with the FSi badge but they didn't really use that technology.
To explain this I've to get a bit technical. FSI stands for Fuel Stratified Injection. The NA FSI engines are direct injected petrol engines and are really running on a more fuel efficient stratified mixture at low rpm and low loads. At higher rpms and higher loads those engines switch to the regular homogenous mixture.

But the turbocharged TFSI engines are always running on a homogenous mixture, thus it's not really right to call them FSI anymore. Still they are direct injected. So basically the FSI badge on VW/Audi engines isn't really anymore associated with the stratified mixtures, but has become a bottomless badge for their direct injected petrol engines. They should have called them TFDI
Wutputt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2006, 04:59 PM   #25
jon_s
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,381
Default

Wuttput, I have just seen you on Saabcentral. I joined to ask about my problems. They seem to think that it may not be as serious as was first told. So I am taking it to a different garage for a second opinion. Unfortunately, they may have just have been stringing us along. So we will put it through a service soon and see what happens.

HOWEVER, regardless of the outcome, we have decided to sell. Time to move on and all that. We also have a better change of getting a bit more money for the car if it is in fact working fine!
jon_s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2006, 06:13 PM   #26
1zippo1
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,668
Default

Originally Posted by Wutputt
Originally Posted by 1zippo1
Btw, the 2.0 TFSi, is it really an FSi engine? because I read that audi labelled some of their petrol engines with the FSi badge but they didn't really use that technology.
To explain this I've to get a bit technical. FSI stands for Fuel Stratified Injection. The NA FSI engines are direct injected petrol engines and are really running on a more fuel efficient stratified mixture at low rpm and low loads. At higher rpms and higher loads those engines switch to the regular homogenous mixture.

But the turbocharged TFSI engines are always running on a homogenous mixture, thus it's not really right to call them FSI anymore. Still they are direct injected. So basically the FSI badge on VW/Audi engines isn't really anymore associated with the stratified mixtures, but has become a bottomless badge for their direct injected petrol engines. They should have called them TFDI
Thx for the good explaination. Allways cool to learn a little more about the technical stuff. I was wondering about that for a while now. So basically a turbocharged engine can't be using FSI technology. I also thought that the 1.6FSI wasn't really using FSI and that's not a turbocharged car.

Btw, John I highly recommend the A6. Have a look at it!! It's got a huge boot and more space then a 95 in the back. The only thing is the long wait if you order it at a dealer. We had to wait 7 months for ours.
1zippo1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2006, 07:19 PM   #27
jon_s
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,381
Default

7 months! :shock: Feck me. We will certainly look. I think Audi still do the 24hr test drives!! Hummm, perhaps I could live the RS4 for a day! haha
jon_s is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump