|
View Poll Results: NA Superchargers Turbos
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
|
  
|
30 |
60.00% |
|
Supercharger
|
  
|
3 |
6.00% |
|
Turbo
|
  
|
17 |
34.00% |
|
Neither I Prefer Anything Wit Nitrous
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
03-11-2004, 06:55 PM
|
#16
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dreamland
Posts: 1,489
|
i NA, but only if its big and powerfull, like a corvette, a Turbo in case of a 2.0 4-banger,
__________________
Current cars: Audi A4 3.slow +Subaru STI + Mitsu Montero
|
|
|
03-12-2004, 12:57 AM
|
#17
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, Mi
Posts: 727
|
i'm goin for the turbo. im a sucker for the turbo spool and the loud blowoff. a turbo was the only reason i ever considered driving a VW beetle turbo S. lovely little performer, too bad its a beetle..... :x
supercharged v-8s are nice too, though.
|
|
|
03-12-2004, 07:06 AM
|
#18
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: United Arab Emirates, Dubai
Posts: 1,387
|
Turbo all the way.. That turbo pull never get's old to me..
Lag problem..can be easily solved as Brembo pointed out.. Or maybe you need an Anti-Lag switch but be really for the bom bom bom..
N/A is not bad.. but needs a lot more work to get huge HP gains from it.
__________________
______________________________________
|
|
|
03-12-2004, 03:56 PM
|
#19
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 3,544
|
natural asrpirated all the way, its like girls with boob jobs, nothing feels better than the normal ones
|
|
|
03-12-2004, 04:13 PM
|
#20
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 111
|
I love the McLaren
It's NA, right?
It's the best, right?
|
|
|
03-12-2004, 05:42 PM
|
#21
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston but from Mty
Posts: 2,113
|
|
Originally Posted by pagani
I have voted for turbo's because you can gain lots of hp with turbo's and the turbo lag is not two bad anymore with the new turbo tech .

|
me 2, its an easy way to gain hp, but some people say its gay, cause they have this big v8s and a turbo 4 cilinder turbo can beat them
__________________
|
Originally Posted by TT
we have a superb community full of great friends always ready to face any kind of menace  .. and win of course 
|
Nuff Said
|
|
|
03-12-2004, 11:43 PM
|
#22
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
|
Originally Posted by oscargarza88
me 2, its an easy way to gain hp, but some people say its gay, cause they have this big v8s and a turbo 4 cilinder turbo can beat them
|
So - you're in Houston - care to bring one of these street turbo 4 cylinders to tangle with one of the many 427 and 434ci N/A 530rwhp V8's in town?
530rwhp is 620 crank HP
|
|
|
03-13-2004, 01:43 AM
|
#23
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA
Posts: 159
|
Akmon wrote:
I love the McLaren FAIR ENOUGH.
It's NA, right? YES.
It's the best, right? NO.
|
The McLaren is the best!!!
It might not be the fastest track car, but i would say, and im sure many will agree and disagree with me that it is the best car package!!! And the NA BMW engine is pretty damn impressive even in todays standards.
oh and if you want the greatest track star, just get the LM version
|
|
|
03-13-2004, 05:53 AM
|
#24
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 530
|
Re: NA Superchargers Or Turbos
|
Originally Posted by ®™▪▪Łчяί¢ąĽ
I just wanted to see wat ppl like more
NA = Good Speed Avrage Accel Long engine Life
Superchargers = Good Speed Excellen Accel Not a very high engine life
Turbos = Good speed really good accel, turbo lag(not F40 that jus goez)
So peeps watll it be
|
i dont think superchargers have short engine life if a car is properly taken car.
my friend has a 88 MR2 SC, and it has over 300 000k's on it..
__________________
sw20
eg6
|
|
|
03-13-2004, 01:49 PM
|
#25
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 225
|
i like all type of engines......can i have all of them in one car???????
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|