Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-22-2007, 10:20 AM   #331
ZfrkS62
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
Default

Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
^ 2 more cylinders and still lighter than the E46 M3 engines - shows how unefficient that engine was

As for the X6 - no please... no. It's totally uncenessary with the X5 and X3 on the road. Who would ever want a 6-Series-based SUV afterall? will it be 2 or 4-doors anyway?
Personally, i think they will let the X3 die. there is too much market saturation with SUVs right now to push a 3 models at a time. I think they will probably make it 4 doors. 2 door SUV sounds pretty stupid.

Just_me: these pics are awesome. this little motor should fit nicely into BMW's arsenal for the Power Wars 8)
__________________

my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
ZfrkS62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 03:14 PM   #332
ViperASR
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,120
Default

OMG

__________________

"plus being able call your penis master chief during sex has got to be comical at least once"-gis
ViperASR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 03:18 PM   #333
ViperASR
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,120
Default

Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
^ 2 more cylinders and still lighter than the E46 M3 engines - shows how unefficient that engine was ?
What is more impressive is it shows how far the technology has come in just a few years to allow the engine to be lighter, more powerful, and rev higher. The E46 M3 motor was no pig when it came out, it was a technological marvel. Even by todays standards it is still one helluva motor.
__________________

"plus being able call your penis master chief during sex has got to be comical at least once"-gis
ViperASR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 03:41 PM   #334
tom333
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: L.A. California
Posts: 116
Default

Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
^ 2 more cylinders and still lighter than the E46 M3 engines - shows how unefficient that engine was

As for the X6 - no please... no. It's totally uncenessary with the X5 and X3 on the road. Who would ever want a 6-Series-based SUV afterall? will it be 2 or 4-doors anyway?
the x6 was confirmed but its not an suv!!!
tom333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 03:50 PM   #335
thepest
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The oldest continent
Posts: 751
Default

Originally Posted by ViperASR
OMG

That's all that can be said, m8!
__________________

Always outnumbered, never outguned!!!
thepest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 03:52 PM   #336
dutchmasterflex
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,566
Default

Originally Posted by tom333
Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
^ 2 more cylinders and still lighter than the E46 M3 engines - shows how unefficient that engine was

As for the X6 - no please... no. It's totally uncenessary with the X5 and X3 on the road. Who would ever want a 6-Series-based SUV afterall? will it be 2 or 4-doors anyway?
the x6 was confirmed but its not an suv!!!
Well the X5 and X3 aren't SUV's either according to BMW.

Where did you hear that the X6 is official?
__________________
dutchmasterflex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 07:16 PM   #337
666fast
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minnesota, United States
Posts: 3,120
Default

Originally Posted by ViperASR
Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
^ 2 more cylinders and still lighter than the E46 M3 engines - shows how unefficient that engine was ?
What is more impressive is it shows how far the technology has come in just a few years to allow the engine to be lighter, more powerful, and rev higher. The E46 M3 motor was no pig when it came out, it was a technological marvel. Even by todays standards it is still one helluva motor.
The I6 engine had an iron block. It isn't surprising that it is heavier than the new V8.
__________________
666fast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 09:41 PM   #338
rave426
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 486
Default

The flatness of the torque curve is awsome, but that is the most linear hp curve i have seen in a long while. These engines are going to be taking beatings by there owners. 8400rpm is very impressive for a V8. Somebody WILL throw a rod! HA

I had wished for more hp to kick the RS4's ass, nevertheless, with the noise this car will make I can live with that. Damn those ppl at ///M are good!
__________________
Each car is special in its own way, Unless its a Hyundai Haha, Im just trippin
rave426 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 09:44 PM   #339
ZfrkS62
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
Default

Originally Posted by rave426
The flatness of the torque curve is awsome, but that is the most linear hp curve i have seen in a long while. These engines are going to be taking beatings by there owners. 8400rpm is very impressive for a V8. Somebody WILL throw a rod! HA

I had wished for more hp to kick the RS4's ass, nevertheless, with the noise this car will make I can live with that. Damn those ppl at ///M are good!
I dunno if this car will be driven or babied. i'm sure there will be a few that modify their suspension and exhaust, but as far as actually driving them? who knows :bah:
__________________

my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
ZfrkS62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 10:42 PM   #340
SPEEDKILLAR
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: België
Posts: 3,213
Default

Beautiful pics of the machine being tested, love the whole scenery

But, I wonder if this engine will have the same orange lights built in the rpm counter, and that you have to wait a bit before revving all the way up? And this is still a BMW, so it is prone to mechanical failures at the beginning of the production.
__________________
Bob Woodward - State of denial

Tariq Ali - Clash of Fundamentalisms

Blaire is a figleaf

Cars are my hobby, driving them is my passion.

Originally Posted by Dan\/6
damn speedkillar, if you didnt have a title already it would now say 'robofucker' or similar
SPEEDKILLAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2007, 01:00 PM   #341
fordgt84
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 523
Default

Ahhhh at last...beautiful engine this one, if they make a csl version and follow the same hp/l figure as the E46 CSL (112.5 hp/l) then we'd get 450hp...cant wait to see the new car and hear that high revvin engine
fordgt84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2007, 04:20 AM   #342
ZfrkS62
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
Default

Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR
Beautiful pics of the machine being tested, love the whole scenery

But, I wonder if this engine will have the same orange lights built in the rpm counter, and that you have to wait a bit before revving all the way up? And this is still a BMW, so it is prone to mechanical failures at the beginning of the production.
it will have the warm up indicators yes. The S85 has held up pretty well in the early stages of production with no recalls or bulletins like the S54 had, so i don't see any reason to be concerned with the S65.


California members, be on the look out. There are apparently a few E87s running around the state, and possibly New Jersey as well. The E87 1er is slated for 2008, along with the re-introduction of the diesel engines.
__________________

my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
ZfrkS62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2007, 05:45 AM   #343
inso
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 633
Default

Actually those vanos problems are gone now, since it works differently than before, now it should last as long as the engine.
inso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007, 06:04 PM   #344
ae86_16v
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
Default

Originally Posted by Roundel Magazine - March 2007
40,000 Spartanburg X6s:

BMW is preparing capacity in Spartanburg, SC, to build as many as 40,000 X6 "Sports Activity Coupes" on top of the 104,632 Z4s and X5s built in 2006. With the 165,000 vehicles slated to be built in 2007, that would push Spartanburg production past 200,000.
ae86_16v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007, 11:49 PM   #345
ZfrkS62
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
Default

Originally Posted by ae86_16v
Originally Posted by Roundel Magazine - March 2007
40,000 Spartanburg X6s:

BMW is preparing capacity in Spartanburg, SC, to build as many as 40,000 X6 "Sports Activity Coupes" on top of the 104,632 Z4s and X5s built in 2006. With the 165,000 vehicles slated to be built in 2007, that would push Spartanburg production past 200,000.
considering the fact that the Z4 and X5 are now built on the same track, this is going to be fucking impressive :shock:
__________________

my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
ZfrkS62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump