07-03-2005, 08:30 PM
|
#46
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Irvine (School), Martinez (Home) CA
Posts: 449
|
This isn't the "post your ride" section, and I don't have pictures of his car, I haven't seen it. I trust someone that age wouldn't lie, especially seeing as the man still has a $50K car.
I can't prove that he had one, but I'm not laying claim to the car myself...
|
|
|
07-03-2005, 08:33 PM
|
#47
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 526
|
I'm not "disbelieving," I'm just saying it's a bit of an odd choice. Don't you think so?
|
|
|
07-03-2005, 08:33 PM
|
#48
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leiria, Portugal
Posts: 1,443
|
I think Ford messed with the wrong guy.
If I knew that JC was having problems... I would never give him a Diesel Focus as a replacement car for a GT!! And I would not want that kind of negative publicity!!
__________________
CB
|
|
|
07-03-2005, 08:34 PM
|
#49
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Irvine (School), Martinez (Home) CA
Posts: 449
|
I do. In fact I don't think I would have sold it. He claimed to have put the coolant line back himself, rather than taking it to the dealer for service. He may well have been one of those two room apartment, 140K car guys, the type who live in LA.
It also seems odd that someone who would be able to accumulate such a wealth as that would be so rash as to sell it after only tinkering with it himself.
|
|
|
07-03-2005, 08:45 PM
|
#50
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Russian living in Prague
Posts: 7,543
|
|
Originally Posted by pharzo
|
Originally Posted by dangerously_cool
I spoke with a dissatisfied GT owner who switched to a Chrysler SRT8 because his coolant line repeatedly came off.
|
From $250,000+ to $43,000? This seem strange to anyone else? :roll:
|
Sound queer to me :shock: From a sports car to......... fat limo? Why would he do that?
__________________

.................................................. .............................
"...free your mind and the body will follow..." - THE MATRIX
|
|
|
07-03-2005, 08:46 PM
|
#51
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Irvine (School), Martinez (Home) CA
Posts: 449
|
Rationality comes sparingly I guess?
__________________
 SRT-4 for sale, 17.5 obo. Not anymore. Totaled, rec'd 18.5 from ins.
tC not for sale. I loved that car.
|
|
|
07-03-2005, 08:47 PM
|
#52
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
|
|
Originally Posted by cooperluke
I think Ford messed with the wrong guy.
If I knew that JC was having problems... I would never give him a Diesel Focus as a replacement car for a GT!! And I would not want that kind of negative publicity!!
|
I guess it's becoz it's Roush and not Ford. If it's Ford, I am sure they would give him something awesome, hey, it's almost like free advertising. But since it's Roush, it really do nothing for them.
__________________
|
|
|
07-03-2005, 10:55 PM
|
#53
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 3,544
|
|
Originally Posted by Ronin005
well he has his money back, so off to 430 he should go. first off i would of never bought the gt, so i would of never been in that boat.
|
i totally agree with you, ive never had bought the gt, maybe if i was a huge fan as JC i would have, but being a ford...
then going for the f430, i think its the wisest decision he can make
|
|
|
07-03-2005, 11:12 PM
|
#54
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
Why did he have a stupid alarm anyway?
There are 28 GT's in the UK - is someone going to steal it and then use it?
The first thing to be removed should have been the alarm/immobilizer, it serves no purpose.
Besides that, he was just looking for a reason to ditch the car.
|
|
|
07-03-2005, 11:14 PM
|
#55
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,351
|
|
Originally Posted by RC45
Why did he have a stupid alarm anyway?
There are 28 GT's in the UK - is someone going to steal it and then use it?
The first thing to be removed should have been the alarm/immobilizer, it serves no purpose.
Besides that, he was just looking for a reason to ditch the car.
|
If someone steals it, he's going to ship and sell it to the Middle East, not London. :roll: That's what the alarm/immobilizer are doing on the GT.
|
|
|
07-04-2005, 12:17 AM
|
#56
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
|
Originally Posted by BADMIHAI
|
Originally Posted by RC45
Why did he have a stupid alarm anyway?
There are 28 GT's in the UK - is someone going to steal it and then use it?
The first thing to be removed should have been the alarm/immobilizer, it serves no purpose.
Besides that, he was just looking for a reason to ditch the car.
|
If someone steals it, he's going to ship and sell it to the Middle East, not London. :roll: That's what the alarm/immobilizer are doing on the GT.
|
That's what insurance is for.
The professional car-jacker looking for a GT will have the alarm disabled in a flash so it's a moot point - the targetted car is gone no matter what.
All you need is the factory key/ignition system... screw the after market crap.
|
|
|
07-04-2005, 12:22 AM
|
#57
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,351
|
|
Originally Posted by RC45
|
Originally Posted by BADMIHAI
|
Originally Posted by RC45
Why did he have a stupid alarm anyway?
There are 28 GT's in the UK - is someone going to steal it and then use it?
The first thing to be removed should have been the alarm/immobilizer, it serves no purpose.
Besides that, he was just looking for a reason to ditch the car.
|
If someone steals it, he's going to ship and sell it to the Middle East, not London. :roll: That's what the alarm/immobilizer are doing on the GT.
|
That's what insurance is for.
The professional car-jacker looking for a GT will have the alarm disabled in a flash so it's a moot point - the targetted car is gone no matter what.
All you need is the factory key/ignition system... screw the after market crap.
|
But having an after-market hyper-tracking system will also lower insurance premiums.
|
|
|
07-04-2005, 12:25 AM
|
#58
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
|
Originally Posted by BADMIHAI
|
Originally Posted by RC45
|
Originally Posted by BADMIHAI
|
Originally Posted by RC45
Why did he have a stupid alarm anyway?
There are 28 GT's in the UK - is someone going to steal it and then use it?
The first thing to be removed should have been the alarm/immobilizer, it serves no purpose.
Besides that, he was just looking for a reason to ditch the car.
|
If someone steals it, he's going to ship and sell it to the Middle East, not London. :roll: That's what the alarm/immobilizer are doing on the GT.
|
That's what insurance is for.
The professional car-jacker looking for a GT will have the alarm disabled in a flash so it's a moot point - the targetted car is gone no matter what.
All you need is the factory key/ignition system... screw the after market crap.
|
But having an after-market hyper-tracking system will also lower insurance premiums.
|
But when you are a wealthy hooligan with a Kevin Keegan mop of hair - you shouldn't care.
The hyper tracking system is pretty pointless anyway. It proved to be all false alrms..
|
|
|
07-04-2005, 12:32 AM
|
#59
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,351
|
But when you are a wealthy hooligan with a Kevin Keegan mop of hair - you shouldn't care.
|
But, apparently, the U.K. cars all came with that alarm/immobilizer.
|
|
|
07-04-2005, 12:36 AM
|
#60
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
|
Originally Posted by BADMIHAI
But when you are a wealthy hooligan with a Kevin Keegan mop of hair - you shouldn't care.
|
But, apparently, the U.K. cars all came with that alarm/immobilizer.
|
And apparently they aren't very well executed  But then again it was a Ford - and to make matters worse, a Roush serviced Ford...
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|