Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-03-2005, 08:30 PM   #46
dangerously_cool
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Irvine (School), Martinez (Home) CA
Posts: 449
Default

This isn't the "post your ride" section, and I don't have pictures of his car, I haven't seen it. I trust someone that age wouldn't lie, especially seeing as the man still has a $50K car.

I can't prove that he had one, but I'm not laying claim to the car myself...
dangerously_cool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2005, 08:33 PM   #47
pharzo
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 526
Default

I'm not "disbelieving," I'm just saying it's a bit of an odd choice. Don't you think so?
pharzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2005, 08:33 PM   #48
cooperluke
Regular User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leiria, Portugal
Posts: 1,443
Default

I think Ford messed with the wrong guy.

If I knew that JC was having problems... I would never give him a Diesel Focus as a replacement car for a GT!! And I would not want that kind of negative publicity!!
__________________
CB

cooperluke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2005, 08:34 PM   #49
dangerously_cool
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Irvine (School), Martinez (Home) CA
Posts: 449
Default

I do. In fact I don't think I would have sold it. He claimed to have put the coolant line back himself, rather than taking it to the dealer for service. He may well have been one of those two room apartment, 140K car guys, the type who live in LA.

It also seems odd that someone who would be able to accumulate such a wealth as that would be so rash as to sell it after only tinkering with it himself.
dangerously_cool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2005, 08:45 PM   #50
ARMAN
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Russian living in Prague
Posts: 7,543
Default

Originally Posted by pharzo
Originally Posted by dangerously_cool
I spoke with a dissatisfied GT owner who switched to a Chrysler SRT8 because his coolant line repeatedly came off.
From $250,000+ to $43,000? This seem strange to anyone else? :roll:
Sound queer to me :shock: From a sports car to......... fat limo? Why would he do that?
__________________

.................................................. .............................
"...free your mind and the body will follow..." - THE MATRIX
ARMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2005, 08:46 PM   #51
dangerously_cool
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Irvine (School), Martinez (Home) CA
Posts: 449
Default

Rationality comes sparingly I guess?
__________________
SRT-4 for sale, 17.5 obo. Not anymore. Totaled, rec'd 18.5 from ins.
tC not for sale. I loved that car.
dangerously_cool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2005, 08:47 PM   #52
5vz-fe
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
Default

Originally Posted by cooperluke
I think Ford messed with the wrong guy.

If I knew that JC was having problems... I would never give him a Diesel Focus as a replacement car for a GT!! And I would not want that kind of negative publicity!!
I guess it's becoz it's Roush and not Ford. If it's Ford, I am sure they would give him something awesome, hey, it's almost like free advertising. But since it's Roush, it really do nothing for them.
__________________
5vz-fe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2005, 10:55 PM   #53
bmagni
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 3,544
Default

Originally Posted by Ronin005
well he has his money back, so off to 430 he should go. first off i would of never bought the gt, so i would of never been in that boat.
i totally agree with you, ive never had bought the gt, maybe if i was a huge fan as JC i would have, but being a ford...
then going for the f430, i think its the wisest decision he can make
bmagni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2005, 11:12 PM   #54
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Why did he have a stupid alarm anyway?

There are 28 GT's in the UK - is someone going to steal it and then use it?

The first thing to be removed should have been the alarm/immobilizer, it serves no purpose.

Besides that, he was just looking for a reason to ditch the car.
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2005, 11:14 PM   #55
BADMIHAI
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,351
Default

Originally Posted by RC45
Why did he have a stupid alarm anyway?

There are 28 GT's in the UK - is someone going to steal it and then use it?

The first thing to be removed should have been the alarm/immobilizer, it serves no purpose.

Besides that, he was just looking for a reason to ditch the car.

If someone steals it, he's going to ship and sell it to the Middle East, not London. :roll: That's what the alarm/immobilizer are doing on the GT.
BADMIHAI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2005, 12:17 AM   #56
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by BADMIHAI
Originally Posted by RC45
Why did he have a stupid alarm anyway?

There are 28 GT's in the UK - is someone going to steal it and then use it?

The first thing to be removed should have been the alarm/immobilizer, it serves no purpose.

Besides that, he was just looking for a reason to ditch the car.

If someone steals it, he's going to ship and sell it to the Middle East, not London. :roll: That's what the alarm/immobilizer are doing on the GT.
That's what insurance is for.

The professional car-jacker looking for a GT will have the alarm disabled in a flash so it's a moot point - the targetted car is gone no matter what.

All you need is the factory key/ignition system... screw the after market crap.
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2005, 12:22 AM   #57
BADMIHAI
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,351
Default

Originally Posted by RC45
Originally Posted by BADMIHAI
Originally Posted by RC45
Why did he have a stupid alarm anyway?

There are 28 GT's in the UK - is someone going to steal it and then use it?

The first thing to be removed should have been the alarm/immobilizer, it serves no purpose.

Besides that, he was just looking for a reason to ditch the car.

If someone steals it, he's going to ship and sell it to the Middle East, not London. :roll: That's what the alarm/immobilizer are doing on the GT.
That's what insurance is for.

The professional car-jacker looking for a GT will have the alarm disabled in a flash so it's a moot point - the targetted car is gone no matter what.

All you need is the factory key/ignition system... screw the after market crap.
But having an after-market hyper-tracking system will also lower insurance premiums.
BADMIHAI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2005, 12:25 AM   #58
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by BADMIHAI
Originally Posted by RC45
Originally Posted by BADMIHAI
Originally Posted by RC45
Why did he have a stupid alarm anyway?

There are 28 GT's in the UK - is someone going to steal it and then use it?

The first thing to be removed should have been the alarm/immobilizer, it serves no purpose.

Besides that, he was just looking for a reason to ditch the car.

If someone steals it, he's going to ship and sell it to the Middle East, not London. :roll: That's what the alarm/immobilizer are doing on the GT.
That's what insurance is for.

The professional car-jacker looking for a GT will have the alarm disabled in a flash so it's a moot point - the targetted car is gone no matter what.

All you need is the factory key/ignition system... screw the after market crap.
But having an after-market hyper-tracking system will also lower insurance premiums.
But when you are a wealthy hooligan with a Kevin Keegan mop of hair - you shouldn't care.

The hyper tracking system is pretty pointless anyway. It proved to be all false alrms..
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2005, 12:32 AM   #59
BADMIHAI
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,351
Default


But when you are a wealthy hooligan with a Kevin Keegan mop of hair - you shouldn't care.

But, apparently, the U.K. cars all came with that alarm/immobilizer.
BADMIHAI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2005, 12:36 AM   #60
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by BADMIHAI

But when you are a wealthy hooligan with a Kevin Keegan mop of hair - you shouldn't care.

But, apparently, the U.K. cars all came with that alarm/immobilizer.
And apparently they aren't very well executed But then again it was a Ford - and to make matters worse, a Roush serviced Ford...
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump