01-12-2004, 08:25 AM
|
#1
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,565
|
Evo's Enzo vs. F40 vs. F50. vs. 288GTO test
|
|
|
01-12-2004, 08:30 AM
|
#2
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 865
|
thanks I saved it and will read it later.
__________________
Blah Blah Blah! Ra! Ra! Ra!
|
|
|
01-12-2004, 08:32 AM
|
#3
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 865
|
damn there's more?
__________________
Blah Blah Blah! Ra! Ra! Ra!
|
|
|
01-12-2004, 08:36 AM
|
#4
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,565
|
This is it.. 0X
__________________
|
|
|
01-12-2004, 08:43 AM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
|
Thanks a lot, i was waiting for it for a long time and i haven't received my copy yet ! Nice entry in JW
__________________
|
|
|
01-12-2004, 10:31 AM
|
#6
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
Ok I was to slow.. still waiting for my copy to turn up in the mailbox... anyway I think I will do some scans myself too, with better quality
__________________
|
|
|
01-12-2004, 01:38 PM
|
#7
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,537
|
thanks a ton! my local Borders hasn't gotten this yet
great article though!
|
|
|
01-12-2004, 02:22 PM
|
#8
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,184
|
What a fantastic article !! The greatest supercars from the most sophisticated italian supercar maker gathered in one review. Although i don not agree with the overall verdict, I haven't driven any of these cars, so I leave the last words to the experts. THX a bunch LotusGT1 !!
__________________
|
|
|
01-12-2004, 02:48 PM
|
#9
|
Guest
|
Congratulations and thanks for the scan...it´s not bad quality, I can read it well.
|
|
|
01-12-2004, 03:05 PM
|
#10
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
|
The engine bay of the 288 is a work of art :shock:
I think the final production number of the 288 is the least of the 4 or am I wrong?
__________________
|
|
|
01-12-2004, 03:49 PM
|
#11
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rotterdam, Holland, EU
Posts: 3,767
|
WOW thanks, i love those ferraris, and i do agree woth the outcome. i like the looks and the"not toop speed, but handling" approach of the F50, its my 2nd fav car together with a porsche CGT, after the big mac. anyway, thanks a lot for showing us this great road test
__________________
|
|
|
01-12-2004, 09:46 PM
|
#12
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: vancouver
Posts: 107
|
i would pick the f40 and the enzo
|
|
|
01-12-2004, 11:04 PM
|
#13
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 736
|
awsome...
thanks mate. i would defenetly pic the F40. the classic of supercars when it comes to a car that broke all expectations
__________________
|
|
|
01-13-2004, 12:38 PM
|
#14
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Zutphen, The Netherlands
Posts: 654
|
Ferrari rules!!!
I would also pick the F40, but I also like the other ones
|
|
|
01-13-2004, 02:22 PM
|
#15
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 43
|
Wow, that's one of the nicest reviews I ever read. 3 Supercars from 3 different ages and those are even Ferraris. You saved my day, thankx LotusGT1! 8)
BTW: Damn that there aren't any sound reviews in the article of those mighty three, that would smash my mind...
__________________
Drive as stealth as you can...
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|