American Cars Area dedicated to American Cars from Classic, Muscle, to Modern! |
11-12-2005, 01:59 AM
|
#1
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dreamland
Posts: 1,489
|
Brand new camaro 700hp
http://money.cnn.com/2005/11/09/Auto...ex.htm?cnn=yes
wouldnt spend that amount of money in a car with a hood looking like that
nice power though :roll:
__________________
Current cars: Audi A4 3.slow +Subaru STI + Mitsu Montero
|
|
|
11-12-2005, 02:09 AM
|
#2
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
|
8.9 L??!!!! Is it really necessary?? No street tires will provide enough traction to harness those torque anyways.
__________________
|
|
|
11-12-2005, 03:53 AM
|
#3
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
|
Hehe, muscle car I quite like the retro-design
__________________
|
|
|
11-12-2005, 04:12 AM
|
#4
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Burlington, VT/Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 146
|
427,000USD?!!!!! that is crazy. it looks great but that seems to be way way to much.
__________________
Cleveland Rocks!
1995 Saab 900 Turbo
|
|
|
11-12-2005, 09:34 AM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 3,627
|
Originally Posted by 5vz-fe
8.9 L??!!!! Is it really necessary?? No street tires will provide enough traction to harness those torque anyways.
|
umm there are plenty of street cars running that much if not more power on street tires with no problem at all and the 572 from GM is bigger and there is even a company that makes a 632 CI motor that a tad over 10 liters. oh and as for the price that isn't going to be a problem for the people buying these cars as there are only going to be 12 ever made...
|
|
|
11-12-2005, 10:19 PM
|
#6
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Baltimore, Md
Posts: 2,221
|
Originally Posted by T-Bird
Originally Posted by 5vz-fe
8.9 L??!!!! Is it really necessary?? No street tires will provide enough traction to harness those torque anyways.
|
umm there are plenty of street cars running that much if not more power on street tires with no problem at all and the 572 from GM is bigger and there is even a company that makes a 632 CI motor that a tad over 10 liters. oh and as for the price that isn't going to be a problem for the people buying these cars as there are only going to be 12 ever made...
|
Who care how big the engine is. Its absolutley gorgeous.
And the car is from Lateral-g.net (should be a known site)
http://www.lateral-g.net/baldwin-motion
__________________
|
|
|
11-13-2005, 11:24 AM
|
#7
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pagani Productions HQ
Posts: 6,237
|
I really like it remains me of the famous big red camaro but whit less horsepower.
Any info on performance stats laptimes and how it drives??
|
|
|
11-14-2005, 07:59 PM
|
#8
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Suffern NY
Posts: 105
|
Originally Posted by pagani
I really like it remains me of the famous big red camaro but whit less horsepower.
Any info on performance stats laptimes and how it drives??
|
I love that Big Red, the challenge still stands I think to top it in the 0-200-0 run lol.
|
|
|
01-21-2006, 08:55 PM
|
#9
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Baltimore, Md
Posts: 2,221
|
Originally Posted by lorbmw69
427,000USD?!!!!! that is crazy. it looks great but that seems to be way way to much.
|
Sold on barret-Jackson for $450,000
__________________
|
|
|
01-21-2006, 09:03 PM
|
#10
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
|
That engine.. drool.. So much chrome.. so sparkly.. I just can't look away.. I bet it sounds so good Id never leave the car.. lol
Here lies gray wolf.. Died of starvation reving his car in his driveway.
__________________
Common Sense- so rare it's a super power.
|
|
|
01-21-2006, 09:28 PM
|
#11
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pittsbrugh,PA,USA
Posts: 147
|
http://www.bath.ac.uk/~ccsshb/12cyl/
Each cylinder displaces 111,143 cubic inches (1820 liters) and produces 7780 horsepower. Total displacement comes out to 1,556,002 cubic inches (25,480 liters) for the fourteen cylinder version.
Some facts on the 14 cylinder version:
Total engine weight: 2300 tons (The crankshaft alone weighs 300 tons.)
Length: 89 feet
Height: 44 feet
Maximum power: 108,920 hp at 102 rpm
Maximum torque: 5,608,312 lb/ft at 102rpm
:shocked!: :shocked!:
|
|
|
01-21-2006, 09:38 PM
|
#12
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Baltimore, Md
Posts: 2,221
|
thats a repost ^^
__________________
|
|
|
01-21-2006, 10:16 PM
|
#13
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
|
Yeah and its not the biggest either..
__________________
Common Sense- so rare it's a super power.
|
|
|
01-26-2006, 02:29 AM
|
#14
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,660
|
Originally Posted by graywolf624
That engine.. drool.. So much chrome.. so sparkly.. I just can't look away.. I bet it sounds so good Id never leave the car.. lol
Here lies gray wolf.. Died of starvation reving his car in his driveway.
|
LMAO I think my obituary would look somewhat similar in a car like this
__________________
2001 Audi A4 1.8T Quattro 5spd
1963 Chevy NovaSS 415hp 355ci V8
"Live as if your were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever."
-Mahatma Gandhi
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|