Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > General Discussion > Video and Picture Links

Video and Picture Links WORKING HTTP or FTP links only, no torrents or other P2P links.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-08-2011, 02:06 AM   #1
tforth
Regular User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,092
Default MT review of 2012 GT-R

tforth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 12:03 PM   #2
Strop
Regular User
 
Strop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Rio - Brazil
Age: 36
Posts: 253
Default

Strangely we don't see more bad comments about the R35, i wonder why...
Strop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 12:38 PM   #3
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

Originally Posted by Strop View Post
Strangely we don't see more bad comments about the R35, i wonder why...
It's ugly, and fat

hows that? lol
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 01:36 PM   #4
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

...and slow.
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 04:33 PM   #5
fordgt84
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 523
Default

hahaha i remember the fights we had when the gtr came out, crazy!...still, i would really like to know what 2.9 seconds to 60mph feels like.
fordgt84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 06:09 PM   #6
Minacious
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The shadows
Posts: 2,397
Default

I'd proudly drive it.
__________________
Ed - Trekkie women are HOT! (A Trekkie for life)
Manic-Depressive and my head hurts.
Minacious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 08:13 PM   #7
Strop
Regular User
 
Strop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Rio - Brazil
Age: 36
Posts: 253
Default

Originally Posted by nthfinity View Post
It's ugly, and fat

hows that? lol
Well it is fat, but if a fat man can win marathons, he don't need to lose weight.
The ugly part is your opinion and i respect it, but i think the opposite.


Originally Posted by RC45 View Post
...and slow.
If you compare it with a F22, it is...
Strop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2011, 02:11 AM   #8
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by fordgt84 View Post
hahaha i remember the fights we had when the gtr came out, crazy!...still, i would really like to know what 2.9 seconds to 60mph feels like.
Easy, ride a 15 year old superbike - sub 3s 0-60mph is old M/C territory.
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2011, 06:44 AM   #9
79TA
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,570
Default

I'll add some nostalgic fuel to the fire . . . transmissions and voided warranty!


They're getting the car sorted out finally, but it still needs to do more than put down unbelievable 0-60 times. The GT-R's that ran in World Challenge last year failed to finish a single race. Reading the manufacturer points standings was always funny. For instance: Volvo: 88 points Porsche - 8 . . . Nissan -88.
79TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2011, 11:32 AM   #10
Strop
Regular User
 
Strop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Rio - Brazil
Age: 36
Posts: 253
Default

Originally Posted by Minacious View Post
I'd proudly drive it.
Thanks! That's the point, it looks like only a few really love cars, others would just drive specific type of wheels..."ooh no it's Japanese, and it's weight 1700kg, errgh, thanks for asking".....give me an old ford escort or a new sports car , and i will manage to have fun in both of them. There are different cars, and different pleasures for each of them.


Originally Posted by 79TA View Post
I'll add some nostalgic fuel to the fire . . . transmissions and voided warranty!


They're getting the car sorted out finally, but it still needs to do more than put down unbelievable 0-60 times. The GT-R's that ran in World Challenge last year failed to finish a single race. Reading the manufacturer points standings was always funny. For instance: Volvo: 88 points Porsche - 8 . . . Nissan -88.
I think that 0-60 time isn't and has never been the goal of the GTR, but the market does what the public wants.It would be good if they still made FR cars like they used to do, light, no fancy electronics, simple and beautiful shapes, but unfortunately that is not what the playboys wants. So Nissan figured out that they had to introduce the traction control again, and now they are doing 2.9s in a FAT car whit "only" 530hp. And that don't avoid the warranty, they only ask you to drive 1 mile after 4 starts, to cool down the gearbox.
But this car was build by people that over the past 30 years were creating machines to go around corners, so they have a little know how about that.
Strop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2011, 02:24 AM   #11
5vz-fe
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
Default

I think we should give credit where it's due. Nissan (tho took a very long time) did an excellent job on the new GT-R. It has completed a mission that the super bunch (RX-7, Supra, NSX) from the 90's failed to accomplish. The GT-R now globally recognized as a direct competitor of the Porsche turbo class. Same bang for the buck class (giant slayer) as the Z06.

There are clearly some management mistakes from Nissan HQ where they don't warrant broken transmissions and denies the launch control as launch control. I am glad they finally turn their head around and address all those in the 2012 GT-R. (If only this is how it's launched)

It is also because of the GT-R's weight you come to learn and appreciate the effort Mclaren put into the new MP4-12C. You can make a heavy car go very fast in 2 3 laps, but eventually, physics is physics.

As for the looks. I think ppl learned to love the looks because of its performance just like the old GC STI or Evo. Let's face it, those are really ugly cars.


All that said, if you give me a GT-R, I would sell it and buy a Porsche GT3
__________________

Last edited by 5vz-fe; 02-15-2011 at 02:42 AM.
5vz-fe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2011, 12:02 PM   #12
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by 5vz-fe View Post
I think we should give credit where it's due. Nissan (tho took a very long time) did an excellent job on the new GT-R. It has completed a mission that the super bunch (RX-7, Supra, NSX) from the 90's failed to accomplish. The GT-R now globally recognized as a direct competitor of the Porsche turbo class. Same bang for the buck class (giant slayer) as the Z06.

There are clearly some management mistakes from Nissan HQ where they don't warrant broken transmissions and denies the launch control as launch control. I am glad they finally turn their head around and address all those in the 2012 GT-R. (If only this is how it's launched)

It is also because of the GT-R's weight you come to learn and appreciate the effort Mclaren put into the new MP4-12C. You can make a heavy car go very fast in 2 3 laps, but eventually, physics is physics.

As for the looks. I think ppl learned to love the looks because of its performance just like the old GC STI or Evo. Let's face it, those are really ugly cars.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjmtsKdrtkU

All that said, if you give me a GT-R, I would sell it and buy a Porsche GT3
This gent understands reality
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2011, 12:21 PM   #13
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

It is a well engineered car, that is a giant killer. No doubt about it. I find it funny that in many ways, it is still faster than the Lexus LFA; which is two years younger, and cost what, 7x more than the GTR? It does look better, sound better, and has a CF chassis...

I read that the new NSX is back "on" again. Now that Nissan had the balls to kick the hp above 276 in a VERY official way, that the others are coming in now. I just find it too bad that Japanese design; which started coming into it's own in the mid 90's... is starting to look very Korean/Malaysian.
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2011, 10:59 PM   #14
Strop
Regular User
 
Strop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Rio - Brazil
Age: 36
Posts: 253
Default

Originally Posted by nthfinity View Post
It is a well engineered car, that is a giant killer. No doubt about it. I find it funny that in many ways, it is still faster than the Lexus LFA; which is two years younger, and cost what, 7x more than the GTR? It does look better, sound better, and has a CF chassis...

I read that the new NSX is back "on" again. Now that Nissan had the balls to kick the hp above 276 in a VERY official way, that the others are coming in now. I just find it too bad that Japanese design; which started coming into it's own in the mid 90's... is starting to look very Korean/Malaysian.
That is were i wanted to get, supercars were and still are a bit too much of show, but unfortunately, no go. What does it matter if your supercar has loads of CF, spacial material, 1000hp, waiting list....and at the end of it, is eaten by a 90's car on a trackday. What it really matters is how every little thing is put together at the end, thats were experience overcomes money. And that is why i like and defend the GTR, they put it together nicely, didn't called it supervelocerapidfasterR35 just to call attention, didn't make you pay billions for a fast ride, they were just fair....they build a sports car, that is good, and can be sold in todays market. They can build a 600hp 1200kg, manual transmission beast, but nobody but us would love and understand it.
Like Bob Dylan said: " The time they are a-changing".........and that's why im not excited about the new NSX, it will try to be a supercar, whit strange shapes, big lights and technology. Just like a geek trying to be popular....

And if you gave me a R35, i would sell and buy a R33.
Strop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2011, 11:15 PM   #15
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by Strop View Post
That is were i wanted to get, supercars were and still are a bit too much of show, but unfortunately, no go. What does it matter if your supercar has loads of CF, spacial material, 1000hp, waiting list....and at the end of it, is eaten by a 90's car on a trackday. What it really matters is how every little thing is put together at the end, thats were experience overcomes money. And that is why i like and defend the GTR, they put it together nicely, didn't called it supervelocerapidfasterR35 just to call attention, didn't make you pay billions for a fast ride, they were just fair....they build a sports car, that is good, and can be sold in todays market. They can build a 600hp 1200kg, manual transmission beast, but nobody but us would love and understand it.
Like Bob Dylan said: " The time they are a-changing".........and that's why im not excited about the new NSX, it will try to be a supercar, whit strange shapes, big lights and technology. Just like a geek trying to be popular....

And if you gave me a R35, i would sell and buy a R33.
LOL



You guys are so full of shit.

All this "GT-R is king on a budget" is a 2-faced double standard.

When some guy says his blower Ford Mustang Cobra GT500 beats supercars, you guys all pull the old "Yeah, but it is still just a Mustang while the other guy drives home in a Ferrari"..



Now all of a sudden the "cheapo" GT-R is the hero car?

This is some funny shytee... hehehe
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump