08-24-2004, 12:17 AM
|
#1
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,451
|
Forced induction or NAtural Aspirated ?
what would u want a turbo or supier charged car or a Natural aspirated car..
personel a Turbo car would suffice nicely for me
|
|
|
08-24-2004, 12:20 AM
|
#2
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 548
|
N/A if possible
high HP N/A cars have nice big redlines
|
|
|
08-24-2004, 12:44 AM
|
#3
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,351
|
N/A Ferrari V12 will do for me.
|
|
|
08-24-2004, 12:59 AM
|
#4
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Puebla
Posts: 1,660
|
I love turbocharged cars, they have something special.
My first car was a turbocharged one and it had some lag until the turbo started to work, but i loved the rush of acceleration when it punched.
|
|
|
08-24-2004, 01:55 AM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
|
N/A for me, either V8 or V12 would be nice. If it was a 6cyl then maybe I could use a turbo or s'charger.
__________________
|
|
|
08-24-2004, 03:50 AM
|
#6
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
7,000rpm N/A push rod 383ci stroked LS6 V8 -- easily delivers 540hp at the crank...
|
|
|
08-24-2004, 05:40 AM
|
#7
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
|
^ you like turbo lag?
__________________
|
|
|
08-24-2004, 05:47 AM
|
#8
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,279
|
lol....
NA all the time, cept maybe in smaller rally bred 4cyl cars
|
|
|
08-24-2004, 06:58 AM
|
#9
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 843
|
All apart for the "rally slag" turbo 4s on the WRC, I would always say naturally aspirated
__________________
"It's not long before Marco arrives, but he's at least five minutes behind an epic wall of noise that's been bouncing off the rock faces like a sonic pinball. Onlookers, of which there are many, seem relieved when the livid red Ferrari skims into view, happier still when they see it's driven by a friendly Italian, and not, as the thunderous sound effects suggested, the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse." Evo #059
|
|
|
08-24-2004, 09:59 AM
|
#10
|
Regular User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 2,766
|
I'd go for NA, and have ever since I first drove a Honda VTEC...
__________________
Current: 2008 BMW 118d SE, 2002 Honda S2000, 2007 Honda CBR600RR
Previous: 2003 Z4 3.0i SMG, 1995 Aprilia RS250
|
|
|
08-24-2004, 11:53 AM
|
#11
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 787
|
Around 5 liters capacity and V10 N/A engine, 4 vale p/cylinder and high revving something like the one on the E60 M5 or the Carrera GT.
|
|
|
08-24-2004, 12:00 PM
|
#12
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: TX
Posts: 3,850
|
Originally Posted by mrmojo77
WIth the turbo. The engine lasts longer, if it's not reved to red line or limiter to get the max power out.
|
I disagree - with the turbo there are more mechanical parts that are added which increase the possibility of failure. A normally aspirated engine should be more reliable than a turbo version.
Personally I would like a powerful NA engine like the 550M.
Turbos are fun what with the kick they give you when they come on song. I love the power surge in my lil car....
__________________
"Tazio Nuvolari - The greatest driver of the past, the present and the future" - Ferdinand Porsche
|
|
|
08-24-2004, 12:21 PM
|
#13
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 3,627
|
well like I've said in the numerous other versions of this same topic I would go for a N/A American V8 nothing better although I wouldn't turn down a SC or TT V8 ala Cobra or LPE427TT
|
|
|
08-24-2004, 03:17 PM
|
#14
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
Originally Posted by sameerrao
Originally Posted by mrmojo77
WIth the turbo. The engine lasts longer, if it's not reved to red line or limiter to get the max power out.
|
I disagree - with the turbo there are more mechanical parts that are added which increase the possibility of failure. A normally aspirated engine should be more reliable than a turbo version.
Personally I would like a powerful NA engine like the 550M.
Turbos are fun what with the kick they give you when they come on song. I love the power surge in my lil car....
|
Although with a built N/A V8 or V10 you can have your cake and eat it..
Many folks I know, have N/A cars putting 480 to 530 horsepower to the rear wheels.. with 150hp wet shot of nitrous on hand to give you the "650rwhp+ (750crank hp) kick in the pants" when you feel like beating the guy next to you by 14 bus lengths instead of just by 6 car lengths,...
Then when you feel like going road racing/circuit driving - the N/A V8/V10 has enough power to be extremely usable with no nasty lag or other tendancies..
|
|
|
08-24-2004, 03:47 PM
|
#15
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 647
|
i seem to llike midsize engines (audi 2.7 liter 6, supra 6, large four bangers) with well thought out turbos
i like the sounds, the rush of power
but then again the scream of a 300hp all motor 1.8 liter 9000rpm honda motor is awesome too
so i guess the logical answer to a question like this is depends on the person, the situation, and the car/motor/powertrain
__________________
Paul Taylor - ASE Certified Master Mechanic -
2003 Miata SE - 1969 Fiat 850 - 1993 Mustang SSP - Bikeboard K1000, A1000, 1991 Geo Metro, "The Project," A few other things laying around...
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|