Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-09-2004, 09:13 AM   #46
MAE
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 79
Default

I love BMW after mercedes they would be my choice i love the old 5 and the 7 and the current 3 and X5 but the way the brand is going now is not the way to go.And im not the only one saying this BMW will never in their life make a car that you can even call a BAD car. Bu they arent at top anymore and thats a shame. you say that merc dont build cars with hard suspension and so on what abt the CLK GTR the CLK DTM AMG i know that theese are limited but you have to understand what the brand stands for and that is luxury and comfort. And now they are making faster cars faster then ever and by the way faster them bimmer around and not just strait forward but also in curves and bends.And u got me right on lving soft fast cars i admit I DOOOO but i also love hard fast cars but not in the loong term. And by the way automatics dont bother me so much and especially not when they are as good as MB automatics but i agree with you that they should have manual trans for those who want it.

So the point is I like BMW htey are cool but for the moment they are behind MB for a while they where in front especially with the old 5 but not anymore and if u dont want to admit it dont but thats the way the story goes....
__________________
LAMBORGHINI
MAE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 09:39 AM   #47
Fleischmann
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,184
Default

Aston Martin - please get the weight of your cars down. I understand that they are GT cars, but it has bad influence on the specs.
__________________
Fleischmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 12:19 PM   #48
Sir_GT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
Default

Good lord...your poor spelling is giving me a headache...

but that's not the point...anyway, here we go...

Originally Posted by MAE
Well look at this here we have a guy defending a sinking ship...
Whoops. Look who's talking. :roll:

Last time I checked on any public survey, BMW trounced MB. I've even seen surveys where the respondents preferred Audi's...

I promise you that if BMW could made a car in the SLR terrotory they would. You are talking liek this is the firs sporty car mercedes has built you need to check up some history beacuse there have been many...
Yes, I'm aware of them. My late grandfather had an orignal 300SL, and a 250SL. Including the original CL. I'm not saying the SLR is the first, I'm saying it was a poor attempt at regaining lost ground.

And then on top of all you say that BMw is the standard when it comes to performence regarding passenger cars. I have to make a correction They WHERE the standard not anymore.
Really? Mind showing ALL OF US an article where a stock MB outperformed a stock BMW? You won't find any mate.

Its the same situation when you say that merc built good cars but dont anymore.I didnt forget that the mclaren F1 hand a bmw engine but notice i have never said that Bmw made bad engines they make in my opinion one of the best in the world but dont forget that in the mclarens performance the construction has a grater part then the engine..By the way there are many crazy fast cars with Merc ingenes like the Zonda..
Just like you pointed out that the McLaren was just as much construction as it was the engine, the same goes for the Zonda. I never said MB doesn't build good engines either.

Mind you, the Zonda has an AMG-tuned V12MB engine. While the Mclaren uses a regular BMW one. It's not M-tuned.

And by the way The CLS will eat the Ugly 6 and u know it and you are afraid i know it. hahahhah.
hahahhah. The CLS is a sporty four-door luxury saloon, not a two-door GT. It is therefore much heavier, less agile, and runs on an automatic. I am afraid you're wrong again. hahahha.

And thats like the only place where Mb dont have a competitor at the moment have you ever counted all the other segments where MB has a car and BMW doesnt there are alot.
And? That's a different topic altogether. Toyota beats the hell out of MB if that's the topic that you want to stress. Hell, if you're basis of supremacy and overall quality is based on the amount of market segments covered, then that would mean that Suzuki is a better marque than Rolls-Royce, since Sir Henry Roll's company only has one offering. hahahhah.

I dont know what means you are talking about but all the means i know says that the A is old thats ehy a new one is comin. The face lift changes alot and who told u that the C class was poorly made do you want to se something poorly made go take a look at the X3.
Again, please point out the areas where the X3 is poorly made. Plastic bumbers maybe? So are the Merc's mate. Plastic bumbers are pretty much standard since they comply to worldwide safety requirements for pedestrians. Last time I checked, the "cheap" X3 outperformed MB's M-class. Hmmm...I wonder which SUV buyer got what he paid for?

Once again i have to say that the 5´s interior is poorly designed and SUCKS alot its really really bad with its stupd looking lnes and large compartments for sunglasses and god knows what.I have driven a 530d and my cousin has a E and i can promise that the e looks better.
I hope you know that the attractiveness of a car's design is based entirely on one's opinion. You might find the lines of the 5's interior stupid looking, but that's your opinion, and you have every right to have one. That still doesn't change the fact that there is still more plastic in the E-class, and the assembly isn't as well done, even though it charges a higher price.

Simply put; given that a consumer finds the "design" of both interiors equally appealing, (such as myself) I would check for the quality of assembly, and the materials used. Unfortunately for MB, I get better build quality and more premium materials with the cheaper 5-series.

I HATE THE 5.And im not the only one including old bimmer owners.
Again, I will repeat for your sake: BMW's current design is a matter of opinion. Recent surveys (such as mine at the public polls section) show that consumer acceptace is split nearly 50-50. What we are talking about here is overall performance, build quality, and value for money; and at the moment, BMW is ahead on all three.

I dont know about the survey´s but i can tell you that i had alot of probs with my 320i and now i have the S500 and its better then anything BMW pffers belive me i have checked them out.
Sorry to hear about your 320i problems. Sounds similar to those A,C,and E-class woes I've read about. I hope BMW sweden treated you well.

Likewise, your age, inability to spell, and lack of any punctuation knowledge highly raises the level of doubt concerning your S-class ownership. It may be your father's, and if you're impressed with it, that's great. It's MB's best car. In fact, at the moment, it is arguably their ONLY good car.

I have one question for u do you think you will be young all your life????
Lets say you get old (i know its hard fo u to belive it) i dont think you will loose your interest in cars. So do you get the point ppl who like cars dont loose with the age OK. so maybe they knows more then you.
I didn't fully understand what you were trying to say there, but if you meant that maybe he lost interest with cars which therefore excuses from not knowing the current shoddy state of MB's products, well, let me put it this way...

HE, was never into cars. He bought MB's because during the 1970's, MB's were reputed to be the best cars money could buy. He bought an S-class then, and the one after that, and he's got the current one. I can't blame him for never changing his opinion of Mercedes - he's bought their best car for the last four decades. He's never bought anything else... and he doesn't know any better either. WE (that includes you) are supposed to know better, simply because we are made constantly aware of all the inside information regarding anything related to motoring.

By the way Kudos to your fiance´s dad for having a good taste.
At least MB admits if they have a problem BMW just ignore it and makes Slower and uglier Cars.
Which one is slower? Are you aware that ALL German marques except Porsche agreed to a 155mph limit for their products? Even then, stock BMW's regularly destroy stock (sometimes even modified) Merc's regularly on the track.

No i dont Belive you. By the way tell me when did BMW win a F1 championship????. So all ppl and brands have bad times and days u should know being a BMW (regular cars not f1) supporter...
I'm quite aware of their standing. Regardless, BMW has currenly only been in formula 1 for a few years, yet their cars are destroying whatever MB has had to offer. Hell, BAR-Honda and Renault are destroying Mclaren-Mercedes at the moment, and their budgets are smaller.

I'm not saying that Mercedes was never good. I'm saying that they are CURRENTLY not performing like they are expected to. I know that everybody has their day, but it certainly seems like Mercedes is going from bad to worse at the moment.

Im not gonna discuss this beacuse what do i or you know about why someone trades a S for a 5 maybe they needed a smaller car so its no point in this beacuse both you and i know that there are many Bmw´s at a merc dealer and vice versa...
Well, the thing is I'm from the Philippines, a third-world country. The only people who could afford an S-class are the VERY rich. Those who have about 2-4 chauffeurs for each member of the family. 1 for the father of the house, 1 for the mother, and 1-2 for the children. In elementary speak: those that can afford an S-class here, never drive them, so they have no reason to hassle themselves with the size of the car. That's their chauffeur's problem, something which they don't really have any right to complain about.

What do you meen by many are you talkin about the ppl you have threatned to like BMW or u will kill them??
Lol. I'm simply stressing my point.

Well seriously u know that Bmw lost alot of costumers with their new look.
And idont know why u are nagging about the mercedes ripping of their costumers i dont know why ppl by more mercs if they are like u say poorly built and has a lot of plastic and cost more then a bimmer???
By the way Bmw uses a lot of plastic and a UGly type of plastic to.
I'm sure BMW's new look has turned off a lot of traditional buyers. The direction they took was never meant to please everybody anyway. They wanted to start the ball rolling towards a more definitive, and forward-thinking look for the brand, which is exactly what they got.

But, I will repeat, the design is entirely subjected to taste.

More people will buy Mercs because of the brand. It is a well known, and widely accepted fact. If I told some regular joe on the street that an Audi A4 is a better deal for the money than a Mercedes C-class, he would think that I'm mad, but that TRULY is the case. I'm not saying BMW's, Audi, VW, or any other brand is devoid of plastics, I'm simply saying that Mercedes uses MORE plastic than some of the other brands, (which includes BMW and Audi) and STILL charges a price higher than the others.

Basically, when you purchase a Merc, you generally get everything you should get with it: respect from your peers and colleagues, a good looking and luxurious german car, comfortable suspension, and some quirky amenities.

What you DIDN'T get was your money's worth. You could have had all of the above, AND MORE, with less money. That is what the survey represents, regardless of sales. Somebody out there may have finally been able to afford a Merc, but when he realizes that he could've gotten better value with some other car, it may seriously affect his repurchasing decision in the future.

So where does this leave BMW behing mercedes as always and will always be im sorry thats just the way life goes hahah.
And by the way if u don like my way to discuss then
SHUT YOUR TRAP......
Well, unlike you, I'm NOT the one WITHOUT any real evidence or data to disprove that my ship is not sinking.

All I know is that countless surveys, magazine reviews, video comparison, road tests, and intelligent discussions have proven that Mercedes needs to do some serious manueouvers to regain the ground that they have lost to BMW...and to a lot of other German marque's for that matter.

Again, toodles.
Sir_GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 12:38 PM   #49
Sir_GT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
Default

Hmmm... I thought I was going to let you breathe, but unfortunately you for you, I'm in a chatty mood.

So here we go again...

Originally Posted by MAE
I love BMW after mercedes they would be my choice i love the old 5 and the 7 and the current 3 and X5 but the way the brand is going now is not the way to go.
So... you're against them destroying Mercedes? lol. You might as well spank Audi and VW for that mate.

And im not the only one saying this BMW will never in their life make a car that you can even call a BAD car. Bu they arent at top anymore and thats a shame.
When were they at the top? It's toyota/lexus that offers the best YGWYPDF* deal. (*You Get What You Paid For) The point being stressed here is that BMW is currently way ahead of Mercedes.

you say that merc dont build cars with hard suspension and so on what abt the CLK GTR the CLK DTM AMG i know that theese are limited but you have to understand what the brand stands for and that is luxury and comfort.
Errr... WHY are you bringing in Le Man's cars? We are talking about their REGULAR consumer products as a whole. We know that they stand for luxury and comfort, we are NOT the ones saying that MB is a performance brand, it is YOU who seems hell bent on convincing yourself (since you won't convince any of us) that they are. (a performance brand)

And now they are making faster cars faster then ever
So is honda. So what?

and by the way faster them bimmer around and not just strait forward but also in curves and bends.
Really? When? Where? Lol. As you said yourself, they are NOT a performance brand, but you still believe they are.

At the moment, Mercedes is TRYING IT'S VERY VERY BEST to present itself as a sporty brand, but contradicts it's attempt entirely by offering only an automatic transmission. Although I am happy that the new SLK has a manual offering, (FINALLY!!!) it is rather unfortunate that you can only get the manual WITH THE SLOWEST BLOODY SLK YOU CAN BUY!!! Lol. It is so unfortunate that the AMG V8 version comes with a 7-speed automatic. You can give it a 14-speed auto, and I will STILL outperform you with a manual on the track, every knowledgable bloke knows that.

And u got me right on lving soft fast cars i admit I DOOOO but i also love hard fast cars but not in the loong term.
Then stop trying to convince us that a Mercedes is a "hard fast car."

Because it simply isn't.

And by the way automatics dont bother me so much and especially not when they are as good as MB automatics but i agree with you that they should have manual trans for those who want it.
MB automatics are poor. Audi and BMW make better auto boxes. That is a fact, not an opinion.

So the point is I like BMW htey are cool but for the moment they are behind MB for a while they where in front especially with the old 5 but not anymore and if u dont want to admit it dont but thats the way the story goes....
Mate, it isn't me who has a problem admitting anything.
Sir_GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 07:34 PM   #50
MAE
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 79
Default

First of all dont write about your self in we form beacuse as i see it its only you and me in this discussion. I dont have the time to answer question by question.So im gonna lay it out for u to play it out. I and many more will pay alot more Just to se the star on the hood when im driving beacuse i feel good and i didnt in my BMW wich was in my eyes one of the better bmw designs. Im not trying to make mercedes a hard fast car. I belive that you are very very boherd by he fact that Mercedes is moving into a terrotory wich BMW controled and the terretory im talking about is fast every day cars.
And i belive that every car brand in the world wants to sell more cars am i wrong?
At this moment MB is selling alot i know toyota is selling more but thats another league. Right now im talkin about BMW,MB and audi wich cost almost the same well MB a bit more but they are closest. And if u check those brands MB is selling very very many cars and if it is like u say that mb doesnt have value for the money then i dont understand why ppl by them. And i already know ure explenation and that is thath they live on their brand. Why doesnt BMW has a brand that strong ??? i think its beacuse they where behind from the start and they are now to.
And it just happens to be so that right now mb are building very beautiful,comfortable,award winning and fast cars so i think that has a hand in their popularity theese days.....

You say that the S is the only good merc (by the way thnx i know that u dont belive its mine but like a said before in other threads i dont give fuck beacuse i know its mine and i drive it everyday=) have you then forgot about the
SL (where is bmw in this very important and prestigious market)
CL ( where is bmw here and if u say the 6 then u are making fun of bmwbeacuse cl destroys many cars ex aston,ferrari and so on with this car)
CLS ( I just love this car and once again no bimmer here either)
E ( the E is better in every aspect despite what u say)
CLK (just beautiful)
SLR (gr8 performance with my measurements and im sure that the performance of this car will make all car enthusiast smile for days including you. But if u want to count fraction of seconds sitting infront of ure PC the be my guest. By the way this cars is beatiful and dont say anything else i have never seen a bmw and i doubt ii will that has a beauty near the one of SLR)

PS
MERCEDES RULES
__________________
LAMBORGHINI
MAE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 10:25 PM   #51
sentra_dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,610
Default

Originally Posted by MAE
First of all dont write about your self in we form beacuse as i see it its only you and me in this discussion. I dont have the time to answer question by question.So im gonna lay it out for u to play it out. I and many more will pay alot more Just to se the star on the hood when im driving beacuse i feel good and i didnt in my BMW wich was in my eyes one of the better bmw designs. Im not trying to make mercedes a hard fast car. I belive that you are very very boherd by he fact that Mercedes is moving into a terrotory wich BMW controled and the terretory im talking about is fast every day cars.
And i belive that every car brand in the world wants to sell more cars am i wrong?
At this moment MB is selling alot i know toyota is selling more but thats another league. Right now im talkin about BMW,MB and audi wich cost almost the same well MB a bit more but they are closest. And if u check those brands MB is selling very very many cars and if it is like u say that mb doesnt have value for the money then i dont understand why ppl by them. And i already know ure explenation and that is thath they live on their brand. Why doesnt BMW has a brand that strong ??? i think its beacuse they where behind from the start and they are now to.
And it just happens to be so that right now mb are building very beautiful,comfortable,award winning and fast cars so i think that has a hand in their popularity theese days.....

You say that the S is the only good merc (by the way thnx i know that u dont belive its mine but like a said before in other threads i dont give fuck beacuse i know its mine and i drive it everyday=) have you then forgot about the
SL (where is bmw in this very important and prestigious market)
CL ( where is bmw here and if u say the 6 then u are making fun of bmwbeacuse cl destroys many cars ex aston,ferrari and so on with this car)
CLS ( I just love this car and once again no bimmer here either)
E ( the E is better in every aspect despite what u say)
CLK (just beautiful)
SLR (gr8 performance with my measurements and im sure that the performance of this car will make all car enthusiast smile for days including you. But if u want to count fraction of seconds sitting infront of ure PC the be my guest. By the way this cars is beatiful and dont say anything else i have never seen a bmw and i doubt ii will that has a beauty near the one of SLR)

PS
MERCEDES RULES
God damn, you support MB so blindly its silly. Is English your first language?

If so, your grammar is atrocious, and there is no way you own an S-Class, and if you still claim to own one, I'm gona hit you with the classic Jabbasworld's=> PICS OR STFU.

I belive that you are very very boherd by he fact that Mercedes is moving into a terrotory wich BMW controled and the terretory im talking about is fast every day cars.
I know this wasn't aimed at me, but I'll answer anyways. I am bothered that all of these people like you believe Mercedes is in some way sporty...they are not. IMO Mercedes is not moving into that BMW 'territory'. Sure, they are both building fast everyday cars, but they are completely different in approach...BMWs are designed for driving...Mercedes...are not. :roll: That means they have different buyers...///M is preferred by driving enthusiast and AMG is for old men or wives who know nothing about cars...

I am really doubting that you even have your license...much less own a car. Mercedes are for old, rich business men who want comfort above all else, and some nice, easy straight-line speed as an option. I would hope if you are a member of jabbasworld you would be the opposite of that...you would enjoy a sports-car, you would be the one who stares at the Lotus Elise while everyone else looks at the Bentley parked next to it...

I just don't know how you can find a Mercedes a better drive than a BMW...why do you care that it has the MB emblem on the hood dude? You should like a car because its fun and involving to drive, two things which you can hardly say about a MB.

SLR (gr8 performance with my measurements and im sure that the performance of this car will make all car enthusiast smile for days including you. But if u want to count fraction of seconds sitting infront of ure PC the be my guest. By the way this cars is beatiful and dont say anything else i have never seen a bmw and i doubt ii will that has a beauty near the one of SLR)
Will you MB fan-boys get over the SLR already! :roll: Yes, it has 600+hp...but so what, its a an automatic transmission GT, I think most people could get more driving pleasure out of a 200hp Super 7...:x
__________________

------------
1992 Toyota Celica GT 5spd, intake.
sentra_dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 02:15 AM   #52
Sir_GT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
Default

Lol. Looks like this chap's pupils have been replaced by 3-pointed stars...

Anyway, here I go again... (I'm starting to enjoy this)

Originally Posted by MAE
First of all dont write about your self in we form beacuse as i see it its only you and me in this discussion.
So far, 2 other people have bothered to post simply to agree with me. Zero for you. I think its safe for me to use the word "we."

I dont have the time to answer question by question.So im gonna lay it out for u to play it out.
Fo shizzle dizzle? lol.

I and many more will pay alot more Just to se the star on the hood when im driving beacuse i feel good
Aha. You've just proven what I posted. It's a brand thing.

and i didnt in my BMW wich was in my eyes one of the better bmw designs.
I'm sorry to hear that. I guess your grandparents asked why you didn't buy a Mercedes and it got to you? lol.

Im not trying to make mercedes a hard fast car. I belive that you are very very boherd by he fact that Mercedes is moving into a terrotory wich BMW controled and the terretory im talking about is fast every day cars.
Why in the world would I be bothered? I own an Audi and a Honda for christ's sake. I also inherited my grandfather's 280SL. That's a Mercedes if I recall correctly. I'm merely pointing out the facts which you refuse to inhale.

And i belive that every car brand in the world wants to sell more cars am i wrong?
What does this have to do with anything?

At this moment MB is selling alot i know toyota is selling more but thats another league. Right now im talkin about BMW,MB and audi wich cost almost the same well MB a bit more but they are closest. And if u check those brands MB is selling very very many cars and if it is like u say that mb doesnt have value for the money then i dont understand why ppl by them. And i already know ure explenation and that is thath they live on their brand.
You answered your own question already. Look up a few quotations.

Why doesnt BMW has a brand that strong ???
No they don't. It is only recently when they've started to make great strides. Mercedes was the standard since the beginning all the way up to the early 80's. Nobody is denying that. It is simply a FACT that BMW have done more to overtake Mercedes's standing than Mercedes has in defending it.

i think its beacuse they where behind from the start and they are now to.
Every car manufacturer was behind MB from the beginning up until the early 80's. Now that is no longer the case.

And it just happens to be so that right now mb are building very beautiful,comfortable,award winning and fast cars so i think that has a hand in their popularity theese days.....
Yes it does, and yes they are building what you have described. A Bentley Arnage is pretty damn quick as well, so is the new Rolls-Royce Phantom, that still doesn't make them performance cars now does it?

You say that the S is the only good merc (by the way thnx i know that u dont belive its mine but like a said before in other threads i dont give fuck beacuse i know its mine and i drive it everyday=)
Like the man said: pics please

have you then forgot about the
SL (where is bmw in this very important and prestigious market)
What market? The "I have money and I'll drive with the top down to show off" market? A stock M3 will destroy the SL on the track mate. If you bust out the touring car M3, it may well destroy the SL55...or the 65 for that matter. You simply cannot RACE with an automatic. That is a FACT.

CL ( where is bmw here and if u say the 6 then u are making fun of bmwbeacuse cl destroys many cars ex aston,ferrari and so on with this car)
Errr...the 6 series is in the same league as the CLK, not the CL. And besides, the CL can never be considered a track car. Please find me the videos where the CL took on a Modena, or a Maranello, or a Vanquish, on a track, and won. Until then, you are merely talking turd.

CLS ( I just love this car and once again no bimmer here either)
Do they need to be here? BMW's are drivers cars, not luxury cars.

E ( the E is better in every aspect despite what u say)
Lol. You sound like my kid sister... "Kim Possible is tops! No matter what! Period! No erasure! Shaddap! Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh!!!"

lol.

CLK (just beautiful)
Destroyed completely by the Carrera 911, the Maranello, the 6-series, (Stock too!) and by the Maseratti.

SLR (gr8 performance with my measurements and im sure that the performance of this car will make all car enthusiast smile for days including you. But if u want to count fraction of seconds sitting infront of ure PC the be my guest. By the way this cars is beatiful and dont say anything else i have never seen a bmw and i doubt ii will that has a beauty near the one of SLR)
You're damn right the SLR is beautiful. Thing is, I haven't seen a single journalist enjoy its performance as of yet. As of the moment, they all have unanimously agreed that the top supercar (300,000++ pounds above) dogfight is between the Enzo and the Carrera GT. The SLR is never even mentioned. It isn't a performance car at all. It is simply, a very fucking fast 2 door Mercedes. Replete with automatic transmission, plastic dashboard, and a boot big enough for 2 golf bags. (something which Mercedes proudly claim)

WHO in their right mind would CARE about a PERFORMANCE SUPERCAR's ability to carry GOLF FREAKIN' BAGS?!?!?!

If that's your concern, go buy an A-class. It can double as your golf cart as well. The arabs are doing it, so why not you? lol.

PS
MERCEDES RULES
In your small, narrow, make-believe world? It seems like it. Although WE (performance enthusiasts) are currently living in reality, and know better.

Toodles.
Sir_GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 08:27 AM   #53
MAE
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 79
Default

DAMN b why are you bitching about me not owning the car havent you seen this thread:
http://www.motorworld.net/forum/show...er=asc&start=0
Take a look
__________________
LAMBORGHINI
MAE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 09:29 AM   #54
he7lius
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 566
Default

I would tell them to be democratic.
Give POWER to the people.

All cars with at least 100 bhp.

And supercars would have to have 550 bhp min to qualify for the supercar word.
he7lius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 10:10 AM   #55
Sir_GT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
Default

MAE

I have to join to view? Nevermind. At least you posted the pics. Congratulations then. Even though I didn't see the pics, I'll pretend its your car and not your dad's. Pardon my doubt, but I don't know you, and its very easy to post pics anyway. Regardless, its a nice car. Just don't be convincing us that its a performance car, and it'll beat a BMW around a track, because we all know it won't.
__________________
Studio Gecko
Sir_GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 10:43 AM   #56
MAE
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 79
Default

Hahha no no my S wont beat bimmers around the track it wasent ment to but some mercedeses are ment to i think they do it good and you dont and lets leave it at that..

By the way for all you complainin on my english its not my first language i try my best if u dont like it too bad....

PS
have you seen the other pages i have posted pics there so u dont have to join image station.
and you can check this one to where i showed other ppl that had the same boubts as you
http://www.motorworld.net/forum/show...ghini&start=40
__________________
LAMBORGHINI
MAE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2004, 01:26 PM   #57
Sir_GT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
Default

I have nothing against your english mate. I sort of guessed that it wasnt your first language anyway.
__________________
Studio Gecko
Sir_GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2004, 03:55 PM   #58
5.7 V10
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Out of the factory...
Posts: 526
Default

Hmm, Pagani. I would ask him to bump the Horse power on the Zonda to 650 and the torque to 620. That would be awesome.
__________________

5.7 V10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump