Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-21-2005, 09:58 PM   #16
zr2man99
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Grayson, Georgia, USA
Posts: 382
Default

I don't care how fast the SL55 is around a track I just love the exhaust note.
zr2man99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 10:51 PM   #17
CSedl87
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 330
Default

Originally Posted by 23790554
i wouldn't have though m3 csl would be faster than CLK-DTM
just wait for the M6 CSL (maybe)
IIRC it weighs a shit load less than the CLK-DTM, that means it can go around the corners alot faster, and accelerate a lil bit easier.
__________________
"At a given day and a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit, and you touch the limit, and you think 'okay, this is the limit.' As soon as you touch this limit, something happens in you so that you can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct and your experience as well, you can fly very high" - Ayrton Senna
CSedl87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 10:59 PM   #18
styla21
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,744
Default

Well didn't this thread backfire
I must say i can't really see the point of this comparison. As just_me said, the truest comparison should be between the M6 vs SL55 / 65.

Also, CSedl87, how can the CSL weigh a 'shit load' less than the CLK DTM. I don't disbelieve you, but could you post some info please. That benz was designed purely with track speed in mind and it's a bit confusing that the CSL happens to be faster...
__________________
styla21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 11:00 PM   #19
ZfrkS62
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
Default

Beemer, BEemer BEEmer BEEMer BEEMEr BEEMER 8)

I"m impressed with this comparison. Shows alot of promise for the M6 and alot of capability in the M5. If it came in 1 second slower than the SL55 despite having a massive torque deficit, in both numbers and accessibility, (700@2160 vs 520@6100) i would say they are dead even, and the M6 will blow the Merc out of the water
__________________

my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
ZfrkS62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 10:23 AM   #20
|Nuno|
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,236
Default

Originally Posted by styla21
Also, CSedl87, how can the CSL weigh a 'shit load' less than the CLK DTM. I don't disbelieve you, but could you post some info please. That benz was designed purely with track speed in mind and it's a bit confusing that the CSL happens to be faster...
M3 CSL Curb Weight:

3050 lb/ 1383 Kg

CLK DTM AMG Curb Weight:

3850 lb/ 1746 Kg

At least on the scale, it's still a Benz.
__________________
|Nuno| is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2005, 08:23 AM   #21
altedza
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 478
Default Re: E60 M5 vs. SL55 AMG Track test results

Originally Posted by philios55
To those that they say that Mercedes are just for straight line speed, have a look at the link below. The SL55 AMG which is been around now for 3 years is faster around the Nuerburgring than the brand new E60 M5.

http://www.track-challenge.com/main_...1=48%26Car2=81
:cry: :cry: :cry:

the m5 remains a bmw in styling and build. its a high performance sedan compared to a high peformance coupe convertible. the m5 is also n/a. )
altedza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2005, 08:57 AM   #22
styla21
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,744
Default

Originally Posted by |Nuno|

M3 CSL Curb Weight:

3050 lb/ 1383 Kg

CLK DTM AMG Curb Weight:

3850 lb/ 1746 Kg

At least on the scale, it's still a Benz.
An extra 350kgs?! :shock: Where did it come from? Superchargers don't add that much weight? Infact i thought the CLK had a more spartan interior than the CSL? How do they justify the car if it is also 3 times the price?
I respect Benz's attempt here, they are taking an innovative path with weight reduction and creating a track-orientated car, however it doesn't seem to have come off to successfully this time?
styla21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2005, 10:11 AM   #23
mindgam3
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,279
Default

Originally Posted by styla21
Originally Posted by |Nuno|

M3 CSL Curb Weight:

3050 lb/ 1383 Kg

CLK DTM AMG Curb Weight:

3850 lb/ 1746 Kg

At least on the scale, it's still a Benz.
An extra 350kgs?! :shock: Where did it come from? Superchargers don't add that much weight? Infact i thought the CLK had a more spartan interior than the CSL? How do they justify the car if it is also 3 times the price?
I respect Benz's attempt here, they are taking an innovative path with weight reduction and creating a track-orientated car, however it doesn't seem to have come off to successfully this time?
My guess is because its supercharged which produces a lot of torque compared to the power output this means they have to beef all the whole drive train to cope with it all - plus mercedes general policy when it comes to weight - they dont care
mindgam3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2005, 12:16 PM   #24
schnell318
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 787
Default

It`s really not that impressive, as others said, M6 will slaughter the sl55 which is his real competitor.
And well as is the case with the CLK DTM, 8.12 is a good time but not for a
€ 124236, 476 bhp, 700 NM two seater compared to a sedan.

8) 8)
schnell318 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2005, 12:40 PM   #25
Sir_GT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
Default Re: E60 M5 vs. SL55 AMG Track test results

Originally Posted by altedza
Originally Posted by philios55
To those that they say that Mercedes are just for straight line speed, have a look at the link below. The SL55 AMG which is been around now for 3 years is faster around the Nuerburgring than the brand new E60 M5.

http://www.track-challenge.com/main_...1=48%26Car2=81
:cry: :cry: :cry:

the m5 remains a bmw in styling and build. its a high performance sedan compared to a high peformance coupe convertible. the m5 is also n/a. )
What are you crying about? Read the posts. This whole thread backfired.
Sir_GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2005, 09:00 PM   #26
thekillingroad
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 73
Default

Originally Posted by Sir_GT
. Imagine what the M6 will do to it, ........ The M6 will slaughter the SL mate.
+..


haha, what can a Merc do to its real competitor BMW in track?
Can Merc handle.. NO it really cant..
And yes. they're just for straight acc..

See what CSL do to all of 'em (+ I heard in the 7.50 lap, the 250kmh limitor WASNT removed.. is it true?)
__________________
Sheer Driving Pleasure
thekillingroad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2005, 10:04 PM   #27
SilviaEvo
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bellevue, Washington
Posts: 3,694
Default

the M5 gets better gas mileage its also a 4 door meaning better for better people moving skills so in short M5 > SL55AMG
__________________
SilviaEvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump