11-01-2006, 10:39 AM
|
#1
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 232
|
Jaguar XKR-R
M6 fighter?
My infos:
engine: V8 5000 cm^3 with more than 500 CV
Weight: - 300 kg than the standard XKR
__________________

Alfa Romeo 8C Competizione
|
|
|
11-01-2006, 11:10 AM
|
#2
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: nfld, Canada
Posts: 915
|
If it has over 500hp and 300kg lighter then it is 100% a m6 fighter. But 300kg lighter? i can't see that happening
__________________
"If you even look at that engine, it'll kill you" - JC
|
|
|
11-01-2006, 11:21 AM
|
#3
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,120
|
Sorry, but Jags will always be Fords to me, and that just dosnt make them cool. :bad:
__________________

"plus being able call your penis master chief during sex has got to be comical at least once"-gis
|
|
|
11-01-2006, 11:26 AM
|
#4
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,418
|
How much did the XKR weight in the first place?
300 kilos off is pretty much!
impressive.
__________________
|
|
|
11-01-2006, 11:39 AM
|
#5
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: not where i want to be.. but life's a bitch i guess..
Posts: 3,262
|
i would never get that over the M6.. even if it was faster (and it wont be) and handled better (LOL!) the M6 is the M6.. other cars can't compete
and i really dont see why everybody find this car good looking.. the front and rear lights just completely ruin it for me.. looks like the DB9 my ass.. the DB9 is perfect! this is just bad..
__________________
Things worth having don't come easy..
|
|
|
11-01-2006, 03:48 PM
|
#6
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Puebla
Posts: 1,660
|
if im not wrong the weight of the XKR is around 1660 kgs, with 300 kilos less and 500 hp they would have a recipe for a really fast car..... but will it be a good driver's car???
__________________
|
|
|
11-01-2006, 05:09 PM
|
#7
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The 51st State
Posts: 10,181
|
Nice pics, I just realised I came across a XKR-R in my holidays, Ill put the pics up in the what did you see today section!
__________________
|
|
|
11-01-2006, 06:52 PM
|
#8
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,166
|
Less 300kg ?!?! I don't believe that. Only if it was a track car :roll:
__________________
|
|
|
11-01-2006, 07:10 PM
|
#9
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
|
I gotta admit, the Jag looks better and better. And coming from a BMW fan, I think I would take the XK over the 6 Series.
|
|
|
11-01-2006, 09:27 PM
|
#10
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: :noitacoL
Posts: 2,670
|
man, i can't wait to see a good review on that.
__________________
|
|
|
11-01-2006, 11:45 PM
|
#11
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brazil
Posts: 493
|
|
Originally Posted by ae86_16v
I gotta admit, the Jag looks better and better. And coming from a BMW fan, I think I would take the XK over the 6 Series.
|
I would take it over the regular 6 series...but never over the godly M6
|
|
|
11-02-2006, 12:22 AM
|
#12
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: :noitacoL
Posts: 2,670
|
i would hardly call the M6 godly, its good but not that good.
__________________
|
|
|
11-02-2006, 02:03 AM
|
#13
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
|
|
Originally Posted by Bernardo
|
Originally Posted by ae86_16v
I gotta admit, the Jag looks better and better. And coming from a BMW fan, I think I would take the XK over the 6 Series.
|
I would take it over the regular 6 series...but never over the godly M6
|
|
Originally Posted by TNT
i would hardly call the M6 godly, its good but not that good.
|
Agreed that right now the M6 will kick the XKR in the balls, but then we don't know much about this XKR-R yet. If they could lose 300kg, that would be amazing!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|