Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-15-2006, 04:47 PM   #16
TopGearNL
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The 51st State
Posts: 10,181
Default

Originally Posted by chest3r
It doesn't look very good. The shape of this new passat is far from being aggressive and this version isn't better. Maybe if the wheels were bigger :roll:
Yeah I would put Golf GTI/R32 Rims under it
__________________
TopGearNL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2006, 05:41 PM   #17
davide
Regular User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,418
Default

Originally Posted by mrmojo77
Det passar på mig! Does someone know when they have changed to haldex in 4Motion Passats? This way they're not stepping on S6 Avants market. If the price here would be the same than davide mentions, I'd be very interested about this car. Unfortunately the V6 FSI version already costs 48,000€ here.
Yeah, expect something around 55-60k up here in the north... or even more :shock:
__________________
davide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2006, 05:42 PM   #18
davide
Regular User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,418
Default

Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
Doesn't look agressive as it should be for a 300hp 250kmh top-speed sporty sedan...
Might be a good thing if you are a family father and don't wanna brag with a super avant from Audi. Something more stealthy, not to showy... like a real sleeper
__________________
davide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2006, 07:54 PM   #19
TopGearNL
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The 51st State
Posts: 10,181
Default

wait, you cant compare the r32 to the s3. the r32 is a hatchback and the a3/s3 is a fastback, 2 different catagories in my book and far from direct competitors!!
No I agree with that Ronin without a moments hesitation. But think about it this way, if you were to buy a fast 3 or 5 doored car (hatch/fastback) most people don't know that there different, and just put them on their list as competitors. I agree that on paper they're not the same, but in real life people tend to see them as the same
__________________
TopGearNL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2006, 08:06 PM   #20
gobs3z
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,590
Default

Unless it handles better than a B6 S4, i just don't see the point of buying this over a used S4. I still like the concept though, are they throwing away the idea of a 4 door coupe Passat? I really found that car attractive.
__________________

"If we could read the secret histories of our enemies, we would find in each story enough sorrow and suffering to disarm all hostility." Longfellow
gobs3z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2006, 08:01 PM   #21
martin100
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,545
Default

I don´t think it can go from 0-60 in just 5.7 secs. In a new German car mag they say something about more than 6 secs which is much more realistic.
martin100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2006, 07:31 AM   #22
franck bullitt
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 10 mls from Eurodisneyland....and too far from unlimited speed's highway!
Posts: 709
Default

It looks very in the stationwagon model
__________________
Coming soon... another RWD car !
franck bullitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2006, 03:09 PM   #23
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

This model will be pulled after a year.

The Phaeton failure proves the market doesn't want luxury or high performance from VW... they want boring grocery getter cars.
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2006, 03:13 PM   #24
sentra_dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,610
Default

Originally Posted by RC45
This model will be pulled after a year.

The Phaeton failure proves the market doesn't want luxury or high performance from VW... they want boring grocery getter cars.
What about the R32, that is a sporty VW and (I think) it sells pretty well.
__________________

------------
1992 Toyota Celica GT 5spd, intake.
sentra_dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2006, 03:21 PM   #25
fsandys
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 498
Default

Lol, this car keeps getting faster in reports, the media speculation over new cars always makes me laugh. We're down to 5.6 seconds to 62 now according to Top Gear!

Soon someone will report 2.5 seconds or something I should imagine. :roll:

http://www.topgear.com/content/news/stories/1338/

-----

and according to CAR magazine it's 5.8 seconds.

http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/first_o...sid=295&page=1
fsandys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2006, 03:30 PM   #26
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by sentra_dude
Originally Posted by RC45
This model will be pulled after a year.

The Phaeton failure proves the market doesn't want luxury or high performance from VW... they want boring grocery getter cars.
What about the R32, that is a sporty VW and (I think) it sells pretty well.
One car that is "cheap enough" to keep a limited fan base happy does nto equate to an entire range.

If you are a "VW" driver, that means you are not able to afford an Audi.. yet.. so when you can you will buy the Audi... not an Audi-like performing Passat...



Its all about the ego...
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump