07-26-2007, 12:58 AM
|
#1
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
100hp/ liter normal aspiration
Detroit is on the onset of 100 hp/liter over the next 10 months with a few interesting production engines...
how long is it before we are running 8000 rpm pushrod engines with 2 cams, and 5 valve heads, and variants of BMW's Vano's variable valve timing... and still 7 liters... 8 liters of displacement...
Will 100 hp/ liter no longer be the european benchmark of an engine? What will the european answer be? Turbocharging is coming back into style.. as can be seen in the 335 i, and the Milichilli concept from Ferrari being the future of the next super ferrari ("small displacement" twin turbo engine)
It's coming, and coming very very quickly...
What will it mean? Is this the future demise of engine building excess? will it be legislated right out altogether?
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 05:42 AM
|
#2
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leiria, Portugal
Posts: 1,443
|
8 liters, 100hp/l ?
800hp?  na?
__________________
CB
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 07:26 AM
|
#3
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 633
|
think tvr speed12 and you are there.
7.7liters and 800bhp.
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 09:10 AM
|
#4
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
|
Originally Posted by mrmojo77
My friend would say that why NA if you can go turbo? Easier to tune up and lot more potential. 8 liters NA going up to 8000 rpm sounds at least interesting though
I think turboing or any kind of chanrging is the way of the future and big naturally breathing engines will suffer from legistlation.
|
Why go turbo when you can go NA?
Easier to tune and a lot less heat and weight and complexity - not to mention "instant on power".
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 09:39 AM
|
#5
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
|
Originally Posted by RC45
|
Originally Posted by mrmojo77
My friend would say that why NA if you can go turbo? Easier to tune up and lot more potential. 8 liters NA going up to 8000 rpm sounds at least interesting though
I think turboing or any kind of chanrging is the way of the future and big naturally breathing engines will suffer from legistlation.
|
Why go turbo when you can go NA?
Easier to tune and a lot less heat and weight and complexity - not to mention "instant on power".
|
I'm just curious if the giant lightweight engines are still going to be considered inferior even while hitting such a benchmark that has kept the euro's from loving our "yank tanks"
...
all the while, european sportscar marques have been increasing displacement slowly, but at a steady rate... Be it BMW, Ferrari, Lamborghini, Porsche, Mercedes... etc.
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 09:49 AM
|
#6
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
|
^Simple...4th law of physics. No replacement for displacement lol
__________________
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 06:53 PM
|
#7
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minnesota, United States
Posts: 3,120
|
Re: 100hp/ liter normal aspiration
|
Originally Posted by nthfinity
how long is it before we are running 8000 rpm pushrod engines with 2 cams, and 5 valve heads, and variants of BMW's Vano's variable valve timing... and still 7 liters... 8 liters of displacement...
|
Hasn't the new Viper already achieved this? I'm pretty sure it has some sort of VVT. Maybe I'm wrong, I don't know.
__________________
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 07:01 PM
|
#8
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
|
|
and big naturally breathing engines will suffer from legistlation.
|
The turbo charging might as well (points out that a wrx engine is much less thrifty on gasoline then the big 427 in the z06).
__________________
Common Sense- so rare it's a super power.
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 07:51 PM
|
#9
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,566
|
It's about damn time! Look forward to it, other than the LSx engines, I haven't been too impressed by what comes out of GM's motor engineering department.
__________________
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 08:54 PM
|
#10
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
|
Originally Posted by dutchmasterflex
It's about damn time! Look forward to it, other than the LSx engines, I haven't been too impressed by what comes out of GM's motor engineering department.
|
LSx is the biggest component coming out of powertrain production haha
maybe the 2008 viper motor has exhaust VVT? I'm not 100% sure... but the 2010 viper will have VVT
|
|
|
07-28-2007, 06:05 AM
|
#11
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 171
|
Honda achieved 100 hp per liter with b16 then b18 and now with k20a2 but the only problem is that engines are really small in cylinder. :x
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|