Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-26-2007, 12:58 AM   #1
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default 100hp/ liter normal aspiration

Detroit is on the onset of 100 hp/liter over the next 10 months with a few interesting production engines...

how long is it before we are running 8000 rpm pushrod engines with 2 cams, and 5 valve heads, and variants of BMW's Vano's variable valve timing... and still 7 liters... 8 liters of displacement...

Will 100 hp/ liter no longer be the european benchmark of an engine? What will the european answer be? Turbocharging is coming back into style.. as can be seen in the 335 i, and the Milichilli concept from Ferrari being the future of the next super ferrari ("small displacement" twin turbo engine)

It's coming, and coming very very quickly...

What will it mean? Is this the future demise of engine building excess? will it be legislated right out altogether?
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 05:42 AM   #2
cooperluke
Regular User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leiria, Portugal
Posts: 1,443
Default

8 liters, 100hp/l ?

800hp? na?
__________________
CB

cooperluke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 07:26 AM   #3
inso
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 633
Default

think tvr speed12 and you are there.

7.7liters and 800bhp.
inso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 09:10 AM   #4
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by mrmojo77
My friend would say that why NA if you can go turbo? Easier to tune up and lot more potential. 8 liters NA going up to 8000 rpm sounds at least interesting though
I think turboing or any kind of chanrging is the way of the future and big naturally breathing engines will suffer from legistlation.
Why go turbo when you can go NA?

Easier to tune and a lot less heat and weight and complexity - not to mention "instant on power".
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 09:39 AM   #5
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

Originally Posted by RC45
Originally Posted by mrmojo77
My friend would say that why NA if you can go turbo? Easier to tune up and lot more potential. 8 liters NA going up to 8000 rpm sounds at least interesting though
I think turboing or any kind of chanrging is the way of the future and big naturally breathing engines will suffer from legistlation.
Why go turbo when you can go NA?

Easier to tune and a lot less heat and weight and complexity - not to mention "instant on power".
I'm just curious if the giant lightweight engines are still going to be considered inferior even while hitting such a benchmark that has kept the euro's from loving our "yank tanks"

...
all the while, european sportscar marques have been increasing displacement slowly, but at a steady rate... Be it BMW, Ferrari, Lamborghini, Porsche, Mercedes... etc.
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 09:49 AM   #6
5vz-fe
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
Default

^Simple...4th law of physics. No replacement for displacement lol
__________________
5vz-fe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 06:53 PM   #7
666fast
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minnesota, United States
Posts: 3,120
Default Re: 100hp/ liter normal aspiration

Originally Posted by nthfinity
how long is it before we are running 8000 rpm pushrod engines with 2 cams, and 5 valve heads, and variants of BMW's Vano's variable valve timing... and still 7 liters... 8 liters of displacement...
Hasn't the new Viper already achieved this? I'm pretty sure it has some sort of VVT. Maybe I'm wrong, I don't know.
__________________
666fast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 07:01 PM   #8
graywolf624
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
Default

and big naturally breathing engines will suffer from legistlation.
The turbo charging might as well (points out that a wrx engine is much less thrifty on gasoline then the big 427 in the z06).
__________________
Common Sense- so rare it's a super power.
graywolf624 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 07:51 PM   #9
dutchmasterflex
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,566
Default

It's about damn time! Look forward to it, other than the LSx engines, I haven't been too impressed by what comes out of GM's motor engineering department.
__________________
dutchmasterflex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 08:54 PM   #10
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

Originally Posted by dutchmasterflex
It's about damn time! Look forward to it, other than the LSx engines, I haven't been too impressed by what comes out of GM's motor engineering department.
LSx is the biggest component coming out of powertrain production haha

maybe the 2008 viper motor has exhaust VVT? I'm not 100% sure... but the 2010 viper will have VVT
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2007, 06:05 AM   #11
golfiste
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 171
Default

Honda achieved 100 hp per liter with b16 then b18 and now with k20a2 but the only problem is that engines are really small in cylinder. :x
__________________
http://www.dailymotion.com/carburologue

car videos
golfiste is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump