FAKER!

[altedza]

this thread is hilariously ignorant. punch the kid in the face.

[altedza]

why did like..... everyone need to say km/h? :/ ask the kid to prove it

[deth]

Originally Posted by altezza he must be lying then Car and Driver review of the 2002 Subaru Impreza WRX Power (SAE net) 227 bhp @ 6000 rpm Torque (SAE net) 217 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm Zero to 60 mph 5.9 sec 5.9 sec Zero to 100 mph 17.5 sec 17.3 sec Street start, 5-60 mph 7.4 sec 7.5 sec Standing 1/4-mile 14.6 sec @ 93 mph 14.5 sec @ 93 mph

umm i dont get it...why does 5-60 take longer than 0-60?

@nchs...your avatar is gonna give somebody a seizure man :roll:

[nchs09]

5 to 60 is slower cause u cant get a jump on ur car.... from a dig, u get a little jump ... i dont know if that made sence....


try it with ur car if its a stick. start off at 5 mph and try to hit 60, u have to wait or the rpm's to go up in 1st, while if u do it from a stand still they go up when ur peeling out....

and yes my avart is crazy, but i like it and i cant find any other ones that have some kind of dj theme.... any suggestions would help

[sikx5]

i can vouch that sti does 0-100km in 4.8-5.0sec's . The stock rex over here does 5.5-6.0secs. that site you checked is fucked up, a wrx quicker to 100mph than a f50 :fist:

[SPEEDKILLAR]

Sorry, but thats complete bullshit, it can be unless its a modified sti.

[coloradosilver]

Even if it was modified, those mods would have to so heavily extensive that I doubt it would be a very plausable reality. I haven't found any STI on the road that can take an F-50 flat out. I'm sure that they may exist few and far between, but not likely to have thet be the case here.

[SPEEDKILLAR]

Yep i agree with coloradosilver