Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-2005, 08:24 AM   #1
yg60m
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
Default New numbers for the Bugatti Veyron

From Thomas Bscher (L'Auto-Journal)
2 : 2 cars every week
3 : 3 seconds for the 0-100 km/h
7 : Ferdinand Pïech put a deposit for the chassis n° 7 (for his wife); his favorite number
17 : the time for the 0-300 km/h.
26 : 26 liters/100 km fuel consumption
50 : number of persons in the Molsheim factory
100 : liters of on-board liquids (oil, water ...) and also 100 liters of fuel
392 : the speed reached by the last prototype.
800 : the weight (in kilos) of the engine-gearbox group
1950 : the weight (in kilos) of the car with a target of 1900.
1.000.000 : € , the definitive price (without VAT).

If I am correct, the 0-300 km/h of the McLaren F1 was 22.3 so 17 s is the number which impress me the most ... with the weight which is absurdly high.
Anyway, I love this car ...
__________________
yg60m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2005, 08:27 AM   #2
manuf40
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

800 : the weight (in kilos) of the engine-gearbox group <-- they're using a couple of truck engines ? LOL
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2005, 08:29 AM   #3
gis
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lancashire,United Kingdom
Posts: 3,846
Default

lol the engine weighs just 135kg less than my whole car,LOL
__________________

http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/5803/dansigsp7.jpg
gis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2005, 08:37 AM   #4
|Nuno|
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,236
Default

WHAT?? 1950 Kilos! :shock:

I was expecting it to be heavy, but not that much...

Apart from the horsepower and 0-300kmh numbers, this car doesn't impress me at all. Give me an Enzo or a Carrera GT instead.

Useless car IMO...
__________________
|Nuno| is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2005, 08:43 AM   #5
bmwmpower
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 1,782
Default

will see,how fast it in real, is brutal fast,but very heavy, but how it can be in corners,
bmwmpower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2005, 08:59 AM   #6
mv
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 563
Default

Originally Posted by Dan\/6
800 : the weight (in kilos) of the engine-gearbox group <-- they're using a couple of truck engines ? LOL
The gearbox seems to be the issue...I'm not sure about its weight but it is said to cost roughly 100k pounds ,however, it is capable of handling torque of 1700NM on the other hand hence there is space for additional upgrades.
__________________
It's not about how fast you go, it's about how you go fast. - Enzo Ferrari
mv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2005, 09:48 AM   #7
htfaber
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Utrecht, Netherlands
Posts: 243
Default

Dan \/6, how the...? :shock: Haha
__________________
"I would sell my house, buy one of these and live in a tunnel!" - Richard Hammond on the Pagani Zonda Roadster
htfaber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2005, 01:41 PM   #8
sentra_dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,610
Default

Fuck! That thing is waaaaay too heavy, that is a boat. I can't believe their target was 1900kg...jeez, talk about aiming high. :roll:

Give me a CGT over this any day...proper gearbox, N/A engine, better looks, will murder it in any corners, not grossly overweight...

Glad to see they have amended the ludicrous 0-300km/h time to something more reasonable.
__________________

------------
1992 Toyota Celica GT 5spd, intake.
sentra_dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2005, 04:03 PM   #9
ikon2003
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,062
Default

Very interesting figures. Thanks for sharing. The ones that intrigue me are:

17s to 300kph - that's mad quick
50 ppl in Molsheim - how does that compare to, say, pagani, mclaren, koenigsegg (more than koenigsegg i'm pretty sure).
392: kph - that's faaaast. i wonder how fast a production model will be.... (i can't wait for the test....)
ikon2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2005, 05:04 PM   #10
antonioledesma
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Guadalajara, Mexico
Posts: 2,306
Default

this car and that weight will not suitable for almost any track. A dull comparison could be with the SLR, too heavy but has the enormous power to be almost as fast as a CGT
the veyron will be a train, high speeds in an interstate highway, but try to stop it

will be a great car, but the single purpouse of the car is speed
antonioledesma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2005, 05:40 PM   #11
mv
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 563
Default

Originally Posted by everso
hmmm....the numbers i know are NOT 1900kg. I met with someone who works for VAG administration and has been inside the Veyron, and knows details about its testing....and the numbers he said were around 1500-1600 KG for the current prototype. His information is very up to date.

as for the car, it's gonna kick everything's ass...completely. I'm sure of it

Straight from VAG, the price is said to be 1.2 Million Euros, not 1.0m.
I find it possible...The Veyron is definitely going to be relatively heavy but those 1950kg are way too much...And I also agree that it might kick every ass in straight line but I'd still take a Zonda F CS over it.
__________________
It's not about how fast you go, it's about how you go fast. - Enzo Ferrari
mv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2005, 06:36 PM   #12
blah
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
Default

Give me the F1 over this, or a Koniegsegg or a Zonda.
__________________
blah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2005, 06:52 PM   #13
Ghostbat
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
Default

Originally Posted by blah
Give me the F1 over this, or a Koniegsegg or a Zonda.
I'm with you. The Veyron won't have a chance on the track compared to the Zonda, Enzo, CGT etc.
Ghostbat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2005, 07:58 PM   #14
mike_sayer
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London, England
Posts: 123
Default

Ditto, i don't think that has a chance of hell of being able to lug 1950kg round a corner in any sort of decent manner, and putting the power down can't be easy either. You can't strap a jet engine to a oil tanker and then go "oh look, aren't we clever, look at all our power". Time will tell...but give me a Zonda/Enzo/CGT/CCR over it any day
__________________
"The Scientist explores what is,
the Engineer creates what has never been."
- Theodore von Karman

mike_sayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2005, 08:01 PM   #15
Mers
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Brazil
Posts: 571
Default

I'd much rather buy one of the wheels and get myself a 993.....

1900+ kilos is just tooooo much....imagine how this will corner...It'll need brakes the size of saturn's rings....
__________________
Mers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump