07-01-2006, 07:07 PM
|
#1
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
|
Chrysler to produce Dodge Challenger
|
Originally Posted by Reuter
Chrysler Group (DCXGn.DE) on Saturday said it will resume production of the Dodge Challenger in 2008 after more than three decades as it takes aim at nostalgia for the U.S. muscle car era.
The Challenger would join the Dodge Charger in the brewing stable of modern U.S. muscle cars such as Ford Motor Co.'s (NYSE:F - news) redesigned iconic Mustang -- homage to 1960s and 1970s designs built on up-to-date platforms.
"It's a modern take on one of the most iconic muscle cars," Chrysler Group President and Chief Executive Tom LaSorda said.
Muscle cars, typically two-doored with massive eight-cylinder engines, bring back memories of a U.S. era of cheap gas, drive-in theaters and cruising main street.
However, the Challenger comes along when $3 per gallon gasoline has the broad market increasingly looking for less thirsty compact cars.
Chrysler did not say how many of the cars it expected to build per year or the targeted retail price. Dodge sold about 188,600 Challengers in its original run and the new car will be produced for the 2008 model year in 2008, Chrysler said.
Chrysler aimed directly at its potential target customers, announcing its decision to produce the Challenger at Daytona International Speedway in Florida, where the Pepsi 400 NASCAR race was to start later.
The DaimlerChrysler AG unit unveiled a Challenger concept car at the auto show in Detroit in January, featuring a long hood, short deck, wide stance and two-door coupe body style reminiscent of the car's run in the 1970 to 1974 model years.
"Chrysler Group production vehicles tend to bear a striking resemblance to the concept cars they follow," Chief Operating Officer Eric Ridenour said. "It's not just a re-creation, it is a reinterpretation and a tasty one at that."
The car had a 425-horsepower Hemi engine, six-speed manual transmission and a listed top speed of 174 miles per hour.
General Motors Corp. (NYSE:GM - news) also is thought to be likely to bring back its Chevrolet Camaro after a prototype inspired by the 1969 version of the legendary muscle car received a very warm reception at the auto show in Detroit as well.
The new Camaro would be priced at about the same level as the Ford Mustang, which has suggested retail prices from about $19,100 to $26,000, and produced in similar volume.
|
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060701/..._challenger_dc
|
|
|
07-01-2006, 07:54 PM
|
#2
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,056
|
"six-speed manual transmission"
About fucking time American companies got back to proper transmissions. This is great news and will hopefully push GM into getting the damn Camaro back to production finally.
__________________
|
|
|
07-01-2006, 08:15 PM
|
#3
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northern NSW, Australia
Posts: 44
|
Although I am a little tired of the whole retro car design fad, it is good to see the American motor companies making more enthusiast vehicles, especially with manual transmissions.
|
|
|
07-01-2006, 08:17 PM
|
#4
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boston/Kansas City
Posts: 546
|
|
Originally Posted by DesertWombat
Although I am a little tired of the whole retro car design fad, it is good to see the American motor companies making more enthusiast vehicles, especially with manual transmissions.
|
I agree with this completely. Not a fan of the Retro thing. But love to see more fast RWD cars comming out!
|
|
|
07-01-2006, 08:18 PM
|
#5
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minnesota, United States
Posts: 3,120
|
|
Although I am a little tired of the whole retro car design fad
|
If this fad results in better looking cars from American companies, I'm all for it. The Challenger is one hell of a good looking car. I want one.
__________________
|
|
|
07-02-2006, 03:14 AM
|
#6
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 673
|
AWSOME
I loved the prototype version it was one of the best at the show just shy of the Camaro. I just hope with all these old school cars been reborn that they don't go pushing it to far though and bringing out there entire back catalogues.
__________________
People who quote "theres no replacement for displacement" have obviously never heard of power to weight.
|
|
|
07-02-2006, 08:54 PM
|
#7
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,106
|
so many retro crap going on that I dont think designs will be getting crazier anytime soon. And I thought that I-Robot cars weren't that far into the future.
__________________
Guess who's Back!
|
|
|
07-02-2006, 09:12 PM
|
#8
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,056
|
|
Originally Posted by DeMoN
so many retro crap going on that I dont think designs will be getting crazier anytime soon. And I thought that I-Robot cars weren't that far into the future.
|
Leave that to the Japanese and Europeans.
|
|
|
07-02-2006, 10:46 PM
|
#9
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,566
|
Bout time American car manufactures have gotten back into the Muscle car game..
Can't wait to see this on the road.. I hope they don't change much from the concept
__________________
|
|
|
07-03-2006, 01:12 AM
|
#10
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston, Tx, learning in Ohio
Posts: 814
|
Wow when i saw the concept i never thought they'd actually build it. Even if they did build it judging by their other SRT models i never thought they actually offer the manual.
Thank god I was proved wrong on both counts. This car has all the parts it needs to be great. Hopefully Daimler can pull if off and make a mustang rival.
__________________
|
|
|
07-03-2006, 01:23 AM
|
#11
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
|
Good news, the concept was wonderful  I know it's retro but it works IMO ...
__________________
|
|
|
07-03-2006, 12:51 PM
|
#12
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boston/Kansas City
Posts: 546
|
The problem with this car is its going to weight 4166 lbs!!!!!!!! WTF??? :cry: 425 HP is a lot less impressive when you see it in a car that heavy! I just could not bring myself to buy a car that weighed that much.
The 2006 5.7L GTO is still the muscle car I would choose, not that its light, but 3700lbs is at least better.
|
|
|
07-03-2006, 01:12 PM
|
#13
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
|
Originally Posted by Global Hemisphere
The problem with this car is its going to weight 4166 lbs!!!!!!!! WTF??? :cry: 425 HP is a lot less impressive when you see it in a car that heavy! I just could not bring myself to buy a car that weighed that much.
|
curious as to where you heard that.
curious also as to where anybody mentioned the 6.2 liter engine in the "basic" v8 option
unlike the Camaro/Mustang.... this car will have IRS.
how much does an SL weigh? about 4100 lbs... and nobody calls that car a slouch
|
|
|
07-03-2006, 01:31 PM
|
#14
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
|
Originally Posted by nthfinity
how much does an SL weigh? about 4100 lbs... and nobody calls that car a slouch 
|
You know why that is.. it's because the nazis build it.. and they can do no worng..  .. but wait, the nazis are gonna build this car as well..
..and I've called the SL an overweight pig before - but did qualify that it is the ultimate long distance tourer..
|
|
|
07-03-2006, 01:37 PM
|
#15
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boston/Kansas City
Posts: 546
|
Yeah I don’t know who HASN'T called the SL an over weight pig. I think The Ferrari 612 and the Veyron are both over weight pigs too. Any car that only has 4 seats or less (and all these cars really should be called 3.5 seaters) should weight under 4000. Really I just can not do anything but criticize any car that weighs more then 4k no matter how much HP it has.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|