Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-01-2006, 07:07 PM   #1
ae86_16v
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
Default Chrysler to produce Dodge Challenger

Originally Posted by Reuter
Chrysler Group (DCXGn.DE) on Saturday said it will resume production of the Dodge Challenger in 2008 after more than three decades as it takes aim at nostalgia for the U.S. muscle car era.

The Challenger would join the Dodge Charger in the brewing stable of modern U.S. muscle cars such as Ford Motor Co.'s (NYSE:F - news) redesigned iconic Mustang -- homage to 1960s and 1970s designs built on up-to-date platforms.

"It's a modern take on one of the most iconic muscle cars," Chrysler Group President and Chief Executive Tom LaSorda said.

Muscle cars, typically two-doored with massive eight-cylinder engines, bring back memories of a U.S. era of cheap gas, drive-in theaters and cruising main street.

However, the Challenger comes along when $3 per gallon gasoline has the broad market increasingly looking for less thirsty compact cars.

Chrysler did not say how many of the cars it expected to build per year or the targeted retail price. Dodge sold about 188,600 Challengers in its original run and the new car will be produced for the 2008 model year in 2008, Chrysler said.

Chrysler aimed directly at its potential target customers, announcing its decision to produce the Challenger at Daytona International Speedway in Florida, where the Pepsi 400 NASCAR race was to start later.

The DaimlerChrysler AG unit unveiled a Challenger concept car at the auto show in Detroit in January, featuring a long hood, short deck, wide stance and two-door coupe body style reminiscent of the car's run in the 1970 to 1974 model years.

"Chrysler Group production vehicles tend to bear a striking resemblance to the concept cars they follow," Chief Operating Officer Eric Ridenour said. "It's not just a re-creation, it is a reinterpretation and a tasty one at that."

The car had a 425-horsepower Hemi engine, six-speed manual transmission and a listed top speed of 174 miles per hour.

General Motors Corp. (NYSE:GM - news) also is thought to be likely to bring back its Chevrolet Camaro after a prototype inspired by the 1969 version of the legendary muscle car received a very warm reception at the auto show in Detroit as well.

The new Camaro would be priced at about the same level as the Ford Mustang, which has suggested retail prices from about $19,100 to $26,000, and produced in similar volume.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060701/..._challenger_dc
ae86_16v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2006, 07:54 PM   #2
nickthaskater
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,056
Default

"six-speed manual transmission"

About fucking time American companies got back to proper transmissions. This is great news and will hopefully push GM into getting the damn Camaro back to production finally.
__________________
nickthaskater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2006, 08:15 PM   #3
DesertWombat
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northern NSW, Australia
Posts: 44
Default

Although I am a little tired of the whole retro car design fad, it is good to see the American motor companies making more enthusiast vehicles, especially with manual transmissions.
DesertWombat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2006, 08:17 PM   #4
Global Warming
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boston/Kansas City
Posts: 546
Default

Originally Posted by DesertWombat
Although I am a little tired of the whole retro car design fad, it is good to see the American motor companies making more enthusiast vehicles, especially with manual transmissions.
I agree with this completely. Not a fan of the Retro thing. But love to see more fast RWD cars comming out!
__________________
That's what she said
Global Warming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2006, 08:18 PM   #5
666fast
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minnesota, United States
Posts: 3,120
Default

Although I am a little tired of the whole retro car design fad
If this fad results in better looking cars from American companies, I'm all for it. The Challenger is one hell of a good looking car. I want one.
__________________
666fast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2006, 03:14 AM   #6
sads
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 673
Default

AWSOME
I loved the prototype version it was one of the best at the show just shy of the Camaro. I just hope with all these old school cars been reborn that they don't go pushing it to far though and bringing out there entire back catalogues.
__________________
People who quote "theres no replacement for displacement" have obviously never heard of power to weight.
sads is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2006, 08:54 PM   #7
DeMoN
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,106
Default

so many retro crap going on that I dont think designs will be getting crazier anytime soon. And I thought that I-Robot cars weren't that far into the future.
__________________
Guess who's Back!
DeMoN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2006, 09:12 PM   #8
nickthaskater
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,056
Default

Originally Posted by DeMoN
so many retro crap going on that I dont think designs will be getting crazier anytime soon. And I thought that I-Robot cars weren't that far into the future.
Leave that to the Japanese and Europeans.
nickthaskater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2006, 10:46 PM   #9
dutchmasterflex
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,566
Default

Bout time American car manufactures have gotten back into the Muscle car game..

Can't wait to see this on the road.. I hope they don't change much from the concept
__________________
dutchmasterflex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2006, 01:12 AM   #10
gottacatchup
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston, Tx, learning in Ohio
Posts: 814
Default

Wow when i saw the concept i never thought they'd actually build it. Even if they did build it judging by their other SRT models i never thought they actually offer the manual.

Thank god I was proved wrong on both counts. This car has all the parts it needs to be great. Hopefully Daimler can pull if off and make a mustang rival.
__________________
gottacatchup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2006, 01:23 AM   #11
yg60m
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
Default

Good news, the concept was wonderful I know it's retro but it works IMO ...
__________________
yg60m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2006, 12:51 PM   #12
Global Warming
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boston/Kansas City
Posts: 546
Default

The problem with this car is its going to weight 4166 lbs!!!!!!!! WTF??? :cry: 425 HP is a lot less impressive when you see it in a car that heavy! I just could not bring myself to buy a car that weighed that much.


The 2006 5.7L GTO is still the muscle car I would choose, not that its light, but 3700lbs is at least better.
__________________
That's what she said
Global Warming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2006, 01:12 PM   #13
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

Originally Posted by Global Hemisphere
The problem with this car is its going to weight 4166 lbs!!!!!!!! WTF??? :cry: 425 HP is a lot less impressive when you see it in a car that heavy! I just could not bring myself to buy a car that weighed that much.
curious as to where you heard that.

curious also as to where anybody mentioned the 6.2 liter engine in the "basic" v8 option

unlike the Camaro/Mustang.... this car will have IRS.

how much does an SL weigh? about 4100 lbs... and nobody calls that car a slouch
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2006, 01:31 PM   #14
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by nthfinity
how much does an SL weigh? about 4100 lbs... and nobody calls that car a slouch
You know why that is.. it's because the nazis build it.. and they can do no worng.. .. but wait, the nazis are gonna build this car as well..

..and I've called the SL an overweight pig before - but did qualify that it is the ultimate long distance tourer..
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2006, 01:37 PM   #15
Global Warming
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boston/Kansas City
Posts: 546
Default

Yeah I don’t know who HASN'T called the SL an over weight pig. I think The Ferrari 612 and the Veyron are both over weight pigs too. Any car that only has 4 seats or less (and all these cars really should be called 3.5 seaters) should weight under 4000. Really I just can not do anything but criticize any car that weighs more then 4k no matter how much HP it has.
__________________
That's what she said
Global Warming is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump