Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-22-2008, 08:01 PM   #1
graywolf624
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
Default Graywolf's review of the new M3

Well, after a long hiatus the reviews are back. If you recall the end of the last review session ended up in me buying a 2008 Corvette. Well lets just hope we don't go there yet again, my wallet couldn't handle it.

There is a back story to what led me to this review, however it is rather long and lengthy so I won't bore you with the details... At least until the Trans Am arises from the ashes in it's new form. In the mean time I have set a goal to test drive something really special this year. Unfortunately the first attempt this weekend was a bust, so I decided the M3 was good enough. I doubt I'll get any complaints.

So the car in question is a brand new M3 Coupe. It is loaded, moon roof, nav, performance package, tech package, uprated leather, etc. From a gadget perspective it has all the little toys I enjoy so much on the Vette and then some. The keyless entry, 3 peat turn signal, speed sensitive audio, and dual climate zone are all present. Also making its presence known are chilled cup holders, the ability to schedule the air conditioning system to cool the car at a time of day, and real time traffic. Then again we all know none of these things is really what gets my blood boiling about a car, so this will be the last you hear about the gadgets.

You also can't discuss the M3 without pointing out the abundant rear seat and trunk room. The back seats even fold down leading to a very deep storage area, if a little on the narrow side. For some reason it also comes with roof rack mounting locations as standard, just in case you want to take your 50k rwd high horsepower car in the snow I guess? Then again I drive a Trans Am in the winter, so he who lives in a glass house shouldn't throw stones. Finally, the BMW service package also adds to the experience, full maintenance for 4 years is nothing to sneeze at.

If I haven't bored you yet with the last 2 paragraphs, this may be the car for you. What you say? You haven't even mentioned how it goes? You the guy who loves cars for the way they go saying the M3 should be judged on the gadgets and luxuries? Before the crowd starts throwing rocks and shouting "You call yourself a petrol head" perhaps I should clarify.

Well, as surprising as it is, I didn't like the new M3s driving manners. Now don't get me wrong the car is plenty fast and goes around corners as if on rails. Its slightly slower in acceleration then my Vette (4.7 seconds), but also faster then the Trans Am. Simply outlandish numbers for a 4 door sedan. So why am I so non pulsed?

Well first theres the acceleration. The car doesn't feel fast. I mean I know I was going fast because the speedo said I was, but if you sat me in the forest with no reference for speed I'd probably be writing this from the hospital. Why? Well I spent most of the rest of the weekend thinking about that, which lead me to a laundry list of gripes about the car. The BMW fans in the room may want to leave now, as this is about to get gruesome.

First the exhaust, I know an aftermarket exhaust is a cheap fix, but this thing is obscenely quiet. My exhaust valves closed on the Vette make this car sound like a Hoover. Not a good thing for a sense of speed, not a death blow though of course.

But then you get to how it delivers it's 414 bhp. It does so at 8300 rpms, 200 below it's 8500 rpm redline. It does it with a power curve that rises steadily from 100 bhp (yes you read that right 100 bhp) all the way up. In other words below 2000 rpm my grand mom's 92 Saturn is faster. According to the dyno in the brochure it takes it all the way to 5000 rpm to clear 300 bhp, something my Vette does in just above 2000 rpm. This means off the line and in gear acceleration just feels lethargic. By the time it gets into the power band in any gear, even first, your moving too fast to discern the power it has built so gradually. Again this is another area that is easily rectifiable, simply down shift the car and rev the nuts off it. I'd like to say I did this a lot on my test drive, but I was struggling to cope with the difference in shift gate to what I was use to. Those times when I did get it right though, it still didn't feel right. By now your thinking I should be committed to the nut house, but hear me out.

The last thing that made me feel like the car was not that fast was the steering and shifting. Both were extremely light with absolutely no feedback. I mean a Corvette and a Trans Am aren't exactly known for feedback, but this was a whole other level. I felt like I could twirl the steering wheel with my pinky. It was disconcerting to say the least. There was no speaking to me in the corners, like I enjoyed so much with the Caymen S. Don't get me wrong the steering was direct. For a car weighing nearly 500 lbs more then the Vette, it certainly was nearly as nimble, but without that feel I felt like the whole situation was sanitized. It just left me cold.

Have you ever wanted so bad to like a car you just can't believe what you thought after you drove it? Thats honestly how I feel about the new M3. Honestly nothing of what I've written here on it's own is that big of a deal. I like the S2000 despite having to rev the crap out of it to get going. I like the TA despite having to modify the car to really feel what it is doing. Sadly combine the two traits together and I quickly lose interest.
Let the flames from the BMW faithful begin.
__________________
Common Sense- so rare it's a super power.

Last edited by graywolf624; 06-22-2008 at 10:03 PM.
graywolf624 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2008, 09:26 PM   #2
yg60m
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
Default

Thank you mate, nice read !
__________________
yg60m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2008, 09:35 PM   #3
Mattk
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
Default

Nice write-up. Although I feel that the more pedestrian approach taken by the BMW engineers was all for a purpose - a result of market research and designing for the majority perhaps.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
Mattk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2008, 09:45 PM   #4
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by Mattk View Post
Nice write-up. Although I feel that the more pedestrian approach taken by the BMW engineers was all for a purpose - a result of market research and designing for the majority perhaps.
The reason is because all the M3 buyers of the last 2 generations have grown fat, flabby and middle aged (all my buddies ) and to keep from these guys going to buy something else (they all really want M5's but can't always swing the money) they simply turned the new M3 into the old M5

Every new BMW is fat and lazy with enough HP to go fast.

RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2008, 09:45 PM   #5
styla21
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,744
Default

Styla has left the building
Nice objective review though, Gray.
__________________
styla21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 12:51 AM   #6
Spiffu
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 252
Default

Top Gear pretty much nailed it on what BMW figured on where the market is for M3 owners.


I've seen a couple around where I live, me being an enthusiast, I recognize cars the average person doesn't, but I still mistake these for regular 3 series BM's.
__________________

It's an 06 dammit!
Spiffu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 02:21 AM   #7
Mattk
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
Default

^I just look at the side mirrors. The M3 mirrors are distinctive.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
Mattk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 02:39 AM   #8
Erez
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: not where i want to be.. but life's a bitch i guess..
Posts: 3,262
Default

i agree that if your over 45, or bold, the M3 is not for you
but if your younger,
__________________

Things worth having don't come easy..
Erez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 03:01 AM   #9
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by Erez View Post
i agree that if your over 45, or bold, the M3 is not for you
but if your younger,
Actually it is the opposite - the new M3 is aimed at the over 45 and "bold" (sic)
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 03:11 AM   #10
79TA
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,570
Default

^ I'm pretty sure Gray is under 45 . . .

Wow, this was really weird to read since I just got done reading the Car & Driver comparo where the M3 takes down the 911 Turbo and GT-R. They praised the M3 for its sound as well as "excellent feel." etc etc. I'm not sure what to think now. My BMW driving experience is limited to an E30 or two. I guess I should go test driving like gray.

I've seen the M3's torque curve too. It's interesting how it's Kansas flat but it just isn't that high which leaves the low revs to be a hp wasteland.
79TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 06:50 AM   #11
graywolf624
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
Default

I'm pretty sure Gray is under 45 . . .
I'll be 27 tomorrow.. So yeah.

On an aside I've read the Car and Driver article myself which makes it even less understandable. In the cars defense I may be spoiled by the two very loud exhausts I currently drive. One of them is probably in the running for top 5 loudest cars here.
But the steering? Reading the C&D comparo I didnt see anything about steering feel. I did see a comment that it was light and flickable. I agree with that part at least.
__________________
Common Sense- so rare it's a super power.

Last edited by graywolf624; 06-23-2008 at 07:19 AM.
graywolf624 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 10:33 AM   #12
dutchmasterflex
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,566
Default

Car and Driver's writers are not to be taken seriously.. especially when they are talking about a new Accord not being sporty or fun enough on the track. They have completely lost it as legitimate car journalists.

Nice to see your little write ups again :good: What's next on the test driving list?
__________________
dutchmasterflex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 11:07 AM   #13
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

Originally Posted by Mattk View Post
^I just look at the side mirrors. The M3 mirrors are distinctive.
And the big gob. Don't forget the gob.
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 12:13 PM   #14
rave426
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 486
Default

Your response to the M3 is quite understandable. I have driven a new M3 as well.

The M3 doesnt feel as fast as some other cars because its lower PEAK torque, but in essence is moving much faster than you think. People who are used to gobs of American power/torque will NOT like a car like the M3. RC45 would hate it and probably want to burn it.

The steering feel is another thing. When you place the car is sport mode using the M drive or whatever it sharpens the steering up quite a bit.

Personally I love high reving engines that explode at the top end, but I also like low end torque. A car like the Z06 is def more exciting to accelerate in, but to me the M3's driving dynamics are excellent. It does everything equally better than about any other car. IMO, no other car buts as many good things together in an automobile than the M3. Comfort, speed, handling, refinement, price...

Thanks for the review. I bet you would enjoy driving the C63 a lot more.

And oh yeah, the M3 has reached 0-60 in 4.4 seconds.
__________________
Each car is special in its own way, Unless its a Hyundai Haha, Im just trippin
rave426 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 12:28 PM   #15
5vz-fe
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
Default

I think they put too much focus on comfort for M3 these days. 3700lbs!! May as well get the fatter faster GT-R.

M5 suppose to bare satisfy owners that crave for comfort while having good balance of performance. Like RC said, M3 has now become the old M5.
__________________
5vz-fe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump