10-15-2008, 06:23 PM
|
#1
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
|
Is it just me, or is the Bugatti Veyron a very good value for money?
Relatively speaking that is.
Somehow Aston Martin sold all of the butt ugly One-77s despite the $1.8 million price tag.
And all Lamborghini had to do was come up with some snazzy body panels for the Murciélago and charge $1.2 million more.
Yet Bugatti engineered a whole new car and spent whoknowshowmuch for 6 very long years to put a 1000hp, 253mph luxury GT hypercar on the road and asked just $1.4 million for one. Compared to the other two, it seems like you're getting a lot more than what you paid for.
__________________
Last edited by HeilSvenska; 10-15-2008 at 11:52 PM.
|
|
|
10-15-2008, 06:34 PM
|
#2
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4
|
the thing is bugatti is making the veyrons at a serious loss. it costs them about 5 million to produce one, i believe. don't quote me on dat
__________________
"The end justifies the means." Machiavelli
|
|
|
10-15-2008, 07:14 PM
|
#3
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Monterrey, Mexico
Posts: 737
|
I think that limiting the car to 20 or 30 units worldwide makes them really pricey, also supercar performance (not like the one on the Veyron) but a really respectful performance, I think it makes the rich collector enthusiast pay whatever it takes to get one....
But back on your topic, yeah, I think the Veyron is the best value for money......
__________________

"Perfezione Leggera Italiana"
|
|
|
10-15-2008, 07:49 PM
|
#4
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 313
|
yeah it is a good "value" for performance, but with the Aston and the Lambo they are putting a price on exclusivity...I suppose you could say the price of a supercar is a function of performance, luxury, and exclusivity...those two are just top loaded with exclusivity.
I'd rather have the Veyron, but I guess if you wanna be just one out of handful of people to own a car I could see the appeal of the others...not that they are bad cars either!
__________________
|
|
|
10-15-2008, 07:52 PM
|
#5
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: not where i want to be.. but life's a bitch i guess..
Posts: 3,262
|
yep, best car to get, if you have about $1.5M burning a hole in your pocket..
__________________
Things worth having don't come easy..
|
|
|
10-15-2008, 08:12 PM
|
#6
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
Originally Posted by Erez
yep, best car to get, if you have about $1.5M burning a hole in your pocket..

|
Noway mang.... for 1.5 mill.. I would rather buy a GT-R and then use the rest of the money to travel round the world beating up on supercars...
|
|
|
10-15-2008, 08:35 PM
|
#7
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 313
|
haha RC you are so dirty
__________________
|
|
|
10-15-2008, 09:22 PM
|
#8
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
|
RC just pulled a woohoo
__________________
|
|
|
10-15-2008, 09:43 PM
|
#9
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
|
And let's be honest. It's not like they're going to make a million Veyrons either. When was the last time you one cruising down your neighborhood?
__________________
|
|
|
10-15-2008, 10:13 PM
|
#10
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,566
|
RC45, you're getting old.. I mean IT's getting old
__________________
|
|
|
10-16-2008, 12:05 AM
|
#11
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
Originally Posted by dutchmasterflex
RC45, you're getting old.. I mean IT's getting old 
|
You are right - I should have stated that you would need the balance of the 1.5 mil. to pay for the maintenance and repair of the GT-R....
|
|
|
10-16-2008, 06:08 PM
|
#12
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,570
|
I'm sure they make money on each Veyron in terms of individual production cost. I just wonder how many they would need to sell to break even given the cost of the car's development.
It's kind of like how PS3's were all "sold at a loss" initially, not so much because of production costs, but because of development costs.
|
|
|
10-16-2008, 06:28 PM
|
#13
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
In all honesty though, if I had the means, I would have one in a heartbeat and drive it everyday - rain or shine.
I would even take one Veyron over a CGT and an Rt12 plus change.
|
|
|
10-16-2008, 06:33 PM
|
#14
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,570
|
hmm, on the topic of a fantasy everyday driver, I might take an RS4 or new CTS-V.
Anyway, buying an S7 would have made for exclusivity at a very reduced price. Saleen really intended to produce and sell many more than they did. It's not the same level of refinement, but I expect they'll only really go up in price.
|
|
|
10-16-2008, 06:58 PM
|
#15
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
Originally Posted by 79TA
hmm, on the topic of a fantasy everyday driver, I might take an RS4 or new CTS-V.
Anyway, buying an S7 would have made for exclusivity at a very reduced price. Saleen really intended to produce and sell many more than they did. It's not the same level of refinement, but I expect they'll only really go up in price.
|
My angle wasnt really exclusivity fo rthe price - just the most brutally refined daily driver on the planet
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|